On 18/04/2012, at 9:17 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Steven,
Jorn,
I am looking into fixing performance regression on EEMBC's bitmnp01, and a
version of your combined patch attached to PR38785 still works very
Hello Mikael,
thanks for the review. Regarding:
Mikael Morin wrote:
is there a reason to guard the class_pointer condition with
attr.class_ok in the first conditional and with CLASS_DATA(...) !=
NULL in the two other ones? Not that it matters much, and in fact, I
think the patch as is is
This testcase is reported as failed on x86
Noticed that this testcase wasn't put in as part of the patch. Fixed as
follows.
tested x86/linux
-benjamin
Hello,
a conversion like int-double-int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found
to do this optimization is the attached:
2012-04-25 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR middle-end/27139
*
Tree level unrollers (cunrolli and cunroll) do complete unroll. At O2,
both of them are turned on, but gcc does not allow any code growth --
which makes them pretty useless at O2 (very few loops qualify). The
default max complete peel iteration is also too low compared with both
icc and llvm.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
It seems an obvious cleanup to me.
OK?
2012-04-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
gcc/
* tree-pretty-print.h (default_tree_printer): Do not declare.
* tree-diagnostic.c: Include tree-pretty-print.h, tree-pass.h and
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
This is on top of Kirill's latest patch.
Based on the earlier discussion. Warn and enforce reasonable memory models
for HLE ACQUIRE and RELEASE. It's not useful to have a weaker compiler
memory model than what the CPU implements for a transaction.
With
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Hello,
PR 52633 is caused by bad interaction between two different vectorizer
pattern recognition passed. A minimal test case is:
void
test (unsigned short *x, signed char *y)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 32; i++)
x[i] = (short) (y[i]
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:29:36AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Does this look reasonable? Any comments or suggestions appreciated!
Yes, getting rid of this fragile interaction by doing more work in
vect_recog_widen_shift_pattern sounds like the correct thing to do.
Or give up when
Hi all!
I'd like to post for review the patch which makes some costs adjusting
in get_computation_cost_at routine in ivopts part.
As mentioned in the PR changes also fix the bwaves regression from PR 52272.
Also changes introduce no degradations on spec2000/2006 and
EEMBC1.1/2.0(this was measured
On 25 April 2012 10:27, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
It seems an obvious cleanup to me.
OK?
2012-04-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
gcc/
* tree-pretty-print.h (default_tree_printer): Do not declare.
*
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
a conversion like int-double-int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found to
do this optimization is the attached:
2012-04-25 Marc
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds heuristics to limit unrolling in loops with branches that may
increase
branch mispredictions. It affects loops that are not frequently iterated, and
that are
nested within a hot region of code that
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 04/10/2012 03:42 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
In that case, besides returning NULL, enter_macro_context sets
pfile-context-c.macro to NULL, making cpp_get_token_1 forget to set
the location of the vari to the expansion point of A.
This seems like a bug
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like to post for review the patch which makes some costs adjusting
in get_computation_cost_at routine in ivopts part.
As mentioned in the PR changes also fix the bwaves regression from PR 52272.
Also
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
So like this instead?
Yes!
Unfortunately that didn't bootstrap, apparently double-int.h is included in
gen* which aren't linked with double-int.o, and the inlines stay at -O0
or with -fkeep-inline-functions. Even guarding
First, thanks a lot for answering.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
a conversion like int-double-int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most
On 04/10/2012 03:49 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Apparently, quite some places in the compiler (like the C/C++
preprocessor, the debug info machinery) expect expand_location to
resolve to locations that are in the main source file, even if the
token at stake comes from a macro that was defined
On 04/25/2012 01:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Perhaps we aren't checking default arguments unless they're actually
used; a could change that if they aren't dependent.
Your reply reached the mailing list a bit mangled, could you please
clarify?
If
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 17/04/12 14:24, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 27/01/12 21:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 24/01/12 11:40, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
So like this instead?
Yes!
Unfortunately that didn't bootstrap, apparently double-int.h is included in
gen* which aren't linked with double-int.o, and
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 25 April 2012 10:27, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
It seems an obvious cleanup to me.
OK?
2012-04-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
gcc/
*
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
void *foo ()
{
return __builtin_return_address (0);
}
void *bar (_Bool b)
{
if (b)
return foo ();
else
return foo ();
}
int main()
{
if (bar(true) == bar(false))
abort ();
}
ok ... outside
On 25/04/12 12:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
void *foo ()
{
return __builtin_return_address (0);
}
void *bar (_Bool b)
{
if (b)
return foo ();
else
return foo ();
}
int main()
{
if (bar(true) ==
On 25 April 2012 00:01, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Wshadow warns whenever any declaration shadows a global function
declaration. This is almost always noise, since most (always?) of the
time one cannot mistakenly replace a
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:46:17 +0200, I wrote:
Here is my current test case, reduced from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-1.c:
extern void abort (void);
enum tree_code
{
BIND_EXPR,
};
struct tree_common
{
enum tree_code code:8;
};
void
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089
The first one seems just moved warning because of different gimplification
order.
Fixed thus. Note that the warning comes out at weird place with input_location,
but that
PING! Here is the original post:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01235.html
This patch fixes the failure in gcc.dg/pr52283.c by adding the missing
dg-warning and dg-options.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Greta
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2012-04-20 Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
Taking your results for S390 and ARM with Neon into account, I guess it
should be included and probably made by default for these 2 targets (for
sure for s390).
OK, thanks to both of you.
Ulrich and Andreas: would
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:29:36AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Does this look reasonable? Any comments or suggestions appreciated!
Yes, getting rid of this fragile interaction by doing more work in
vect_recog_widen_shift_pattern sounds like the correct thing to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/12 03:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Aldy Hernandezal...@redhat.com wrote:
Richard. Thanks so much for reviewing and providing an alternative
approach, which AFAICT provides
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Does this look reasonable? Any comments or suggestions appreciated!
Yes, getting rid of this fragile interaction by doing more work in
vect_recog_widen_shift_pattern sounds like the correct thing to do.
OK, I'll try to
Hi!
This patch fixes the attached execute/ testcases. In some cases
get_best_mode was ignoring bitregion_* restrictions and returned
mode that overlapped into adjacent non-bitfields, or store_bit_field_1
for insv could ignore those restrictions completely.
After fixing that I've run into several
The test gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c fails on arm-none-eabi with neon enabled:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c scan-tree-dump-times vect vectorized 1
loops 2
The test expects 2 loops to be vectorized, while gcc successfully vectorizes
3 loops in this test using neon on arm. This patch adjusts the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Thomas Schwinge
tho...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:46:17 +0200, I wrote:
Here is my current test case, reduced from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-1.c:
extern void abort (void);
enum tree_code
{
BIND_EXPR,
};
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
PING! Here is the original post:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01235.html
This patch fixes the failure in gcc.dg/pr52283.c by adding the missing
dg-warning and dg-options.
OK for trunk?
Didn't I approve
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 25 April 2012 00:01, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Wshadow warns whenever any declaration shadows a global function
declaration. This is almost always noise, since most
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This patch fixes the attached execute/ testcases. In some cases
get_best_mode was ignoring bitregion_* restrictions and returned
mode that overlapped into adjacent non-bitfields, or store_bit_field_1
for insv could ignore those restrictions
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
The test gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c fails on arm-none-eabi with neon enabled:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c scan-tree-dump-times vect vectorized 1
loops 2
The test expects 2 loops to be vectorized, while gcc successfully
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 April 2012 00:01, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Wshadow warns whenever any declaration shadows a global function
declaration. This is almost
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 25 April 2012 00:01, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Wshadow warns whenever any declaration
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a testcase to verify register saves and restores.
I tried to write it so that it will run on all powerpc targets. From
past experience it probably won't. OK to apply anyway, and fix
fallout later?
*
Andreas Krebbel wrote:
2011-11-17 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* reload.c (find_reloads): Change the loop nesting when trying an
alternative with swapped operands.
This is OK.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and
Committed, tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-04-25 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_5.c: Adjust.
* gcc.target/i386/l_fma_double_4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float_2.c: Likewise.
*
Hello,
For the PA(1).Z := 44; assignment in the attached Ada
testcase, we observe the gcc 4.5 SRA pass performing an
invalid transformation, turning:
struct {
system__pack_48__bits_48 OBJ;
} D.1432;
D.1432.OBJ = D.1435;
T1b.F = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRstruct pt__point(D.1432);
into:
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
There are various conversion related warnings that trigger on
potentially dangerous uses of NULL (or __null). NULL is defined as a
macro in a system header, so
On Apr 25, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
PING! Here is the original post:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01235.html
This patch fixes the failure in gcc.dg/pr52283.c by adding the missing
Hi!
For reasonable debugging experience recent GCC versions need
GDB = 7.0 for quite some time, and DWARF4 is almost 2 years old now,
and offers lots of improvements over DWARF2 we still default to.
So, I'd like to make -gdwarf-4 (just the version, of course -g
is needed to enable debug info
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
I've been carrying this patch for quite some while now and really
want to go forward with it - the problem is that while all default
languages work fine after this patch Ada shows some testsuite
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
OK. Gerald, does the patch for gcc-4.8/changes.html look OK?
Yes, it does, thank you. Just add a and the in three places,
as in A new option, the...optimization and at the...level
when committing it, please.
Cheers,
Gerald
Consider the test case g++.dg/other/offsetof5.C:
#include stddef.h
struct A
{
char c;
int i;
};
int j = offsetof (A, i);// { dg-warning invalid
access|offsetof }
template typename T
struct S
{
T h;
T i;
static const int
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
a conversion like int-double-int is just the identity, as long as double
is big enough to represent all ints exactly. The most natural way I found to
do this
Hi,
We may generate DW_OP_GNU_regval_type with INVALID_REGNUM. This patch
adds an assert to make sure that we don't. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2012-04-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR debug/52857
* dwarf2out.c (dbx_reg_number): Assert return value !=
In gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30457.c, the first warning was not being
emitted because the relevant location was inside the var_start macro
defined in a system header. It can even point to a token for a
builtin macro there. This patch unwinds to the first token in real
source code in that case.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
There are various conversion related warnings that trigger on
potentially dangerous uses of
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
In gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30457.c, the first warning was not being
emitted because the relevant location was inside the var_start macro
defined in a system header. It can even point to a token for a
builtin macro there.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Consider the test case g++.dg/other/offsetof5.C:
#include stddef.h
struct A
{
char c;
int i;
};
int j = offsetof (A, i); // { dg-warning invalid
access|offsetof }
template
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com wrote:
Hello,
For the PA(1).Z := 44; assignment in the attached Ada
testcase, we observe the gcc 4.5 SRA pass performing an
invalid transformation, turning:
struct {
system__pack_48__bits_48 OBJ;
} D.1432;
Even after all the patches I have already submitted for this
-ftrack-macro-expansion business, some test cases where errors happens
on tokens that are defined in macros see their output change in an
incompatible way, when you run them with or without
-ftrack-macro-expansion.
I think this is
Hi,
this PR is about the resolution of core/1333 being unimplemented, thus
we reject things like:
struct foo
{
foo(foo) = default; // ERROR HERE
};
(and this can be annoying, as explained by Eric on the reflector, for
example when one has to resort to out-of-class
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
wrote:
The test gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-8.c fails on arm-none-eabi with neon
enabled:
FAIL:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
wrote:
The test
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like to post for review the patch which makes some costs adjusting
in get_computation_cost_at routine in ivopts part.
As
Hopefully closing the series, this patch switches the compiler to
-ftrack-macro-expansion=2 by default.
Tested and bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
libcpp/
* init.c (cpp_create_reader): Switch -ftrack-macro-expansion=2 on
by default. Add comments.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like to post for review the patch which makes
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
.h = {1},
^
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: (near initialization for
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
Thanks. But a point of the suggestion was that we won't need the
same comment/explanation duplicated over at least 3 places. Just
one. All those three places deal exactly with one instance: null
pointer constant. That deserves a
-Original Message-
From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 April 2012 15:32
To: Greta Yorsh
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; mikest...@comcast.net; r...@cebitec.uni-
bielefeld.de; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [Patch, testsuite] fix failure in test
Hi,
the fortran problem is caused by fact that fortran does nested funtions that
are static constructors. I did not really think of that case in cgraph
construction code. Fixed thus.
Honza
PR middle-end/53089
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_process_new_functions): Do not enqueue new
This patch cleans up the implementation of atomic protected types. No changes
in behavior.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-04-25 Hristian Kirtchev kirtc...@adacore.com
* exp_ch9.adb: Rename Lock_Free_Sub_Type
to Lock_Free_Subprogram. Remove type
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
In gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30457.c, the first warning was not being
emitted because the relevant location was inside the var_start macro
defined in a system header.
OK, thanks!
-- Gaby
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
In gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30457.c, the first warning was not being
emitted because the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Even after all the patches I have already submitted for this
-ftrack-macro-expansion business, some test cases where errors happens
on tokens that are defined in macros see their output change in an
incompatible way, when
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Hopefully closing the series, this patch switches the compiler to
-ftrack-macro-expansion=2 by default.
Tested and bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
Makes sense to me; Tom?
-- Gaby
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
* params.def (PARAM_MIN_ITER_UNROLL_WITH_BRANCHES): New param.
(PARAM_UNROLL_OUTER_LOOP_BRANCH_BUDGET): Ditto.
You should
I have re-based my tree on top of a recent tree that incorporates the
changes for caret diagnostics and I had to update this patch
accordingly. Here is its new version on trunk of today. It basically
updates the new diagnostic_show_locus function to point to spelling
locations.
The patch does
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
tejohn...@google.com (Teresa Johnson) writes:
This patch adds heuristics to limit unrolling in loops with branches that
may increase
branch mispredictions. It affects loops that are not frequently iterated,
and that are
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
This patch adds heuristics to limit unrolling in loops with branches that
may increase
branch mispredictions. It affects loops that
ChangeLog:
* config.sub: Update to 2012-04-18 version from official repo.
Thanks to everyone who answered. This patch is no in, both GCC src.
--
Joel
On 04/25/12 06:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-04-25 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* common.opt (flag_debug_types_section): Default to 0.
(dwarf_version): Default to 4.
(dwarf_record_gcc_switches): Default to 1.
(dwarf_strict): Default to 0.
* toplev.c
On 25 April 2012 16:46, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch improves missing initializers diagnostics. From:
pr36446.c:13:3: warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
.h = {1},
I think the general mechanism applies to most of the targets. What is
needed is target specific parameter (branch budget) tuning which can
be done separately -- there exist a way to do that already.
David
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 25/04/12 15:31, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Greta Yorsh
Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Dodji,
Hello Manuel,
Sorry for my late reply, I was on the road.
I was going to commit this as obvious, but I want to make sure that it
doesn't conflict with your new track-macro-expansion patches. It can
also wait until you commit all
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
+ /* Return true when there are references to NODE. */
+
+ static bool
+ referred_to_p (symtab_node node)
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct ipa_ref *ref;
+
+ for (i = 0; ipa_ref_list_referring_iterate (node-symbol.ref_list, i,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
+ /* Return true when there are references to NODE. */
+
+ static bool
+ referred_to_p (symtab_node node)
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct ipa_ref *ref;
+
+ for (i = 0; ipa_ref_list_referring_iterate
Hello,
Thanks for this work!
Below are a bunch of spelling fixes ;-)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
--- 19,28
along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. */
! /* This module implements main driver of
Gaby == Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net writes:
Gaby On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com wrote:
Hopefully closing the series, this patch switches the compiler to
-ftrack-macro-expansion=2 by default.
Tested and bootstrapped on
On 25 April 2012 08:33, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
This testcase is reported as failed on x86
Yep.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-04/msg02547.html
Benjamin?
Noticed that this testcase wasn't put in as part of the patch. Fixed as
follows.
tested x86/linux
-benjamin
* include/std/scoped_allocator (scoped_allocator::__outermost): Do
not pass non-POD to varargs function.
* testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/1.cc: Fix test.
This fixes a potential problem in scoped_allocator and fixes a
broken test (and ensures it actually runs!)
Tested
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
+ /* Return true when there are references to NODE. */
+
+ static bool
+ referred_to_p (symtab_node node)
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct ipa_ref *ref;
+
+ for (i = 0; ipa_ref_list_referring_iterate
Hello,
Thanks for this work!
Below are a bunch of spelling fixes ;-)
Thanks!
The function can be called multiple times when multiple source level
! compilation units are combined.
Is this still applicable? I thought -combine was removed. Or is this
for things like
On 04/25/12 06:59, H.J. Lu wrote:
PR debug/52857
* dwarf2out.c (dbx_reg_number): Assert return value !=
INVALID_REGNUM.
Ok.
r~
On 04/25/12 11:46, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
+ /* Return true when there are references to NODE. */
+
+ static bool
+ referred_to_p (symtab_node node)
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct ipa_ref *ref;
+
+ for (i = 0;
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilkplus branch affecting both C and C++ compilers.
This patch will insert elemental functions when the loop is vectorized.
Thanking You,
Yours Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.diff --git a/gcc/cilk.h b/gcc/cilk.h
index 27d5dd0..27ccd16 100644
---
Hi!
We have a splitter for reg1 = reg2 0x, but only if regnums
are different. But movl %edi, %edi is a cheaper variant of
andq $0x, %rdi even with the same register and doesn't clobber
flags, so this patch attempts to expand it as a zero extension early.
Bootstrapped/regtested
On 04/25/12 12:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-04-25 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR target/53110
* config/i386/i386.md (andmode3): For andq $0x, reg
instead expand it as zero extension.
Ok.
r~
Sorry, I forgot to include Changelog entries. I am attaching the updated patch.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:08 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Elemental function insertion
On 04/25/12 01:29, Andi Kleen wrote:
gcc/:
2012-04-24 Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
* builtins.c (get_memmodel): Add val. Call target.memmodel_check
and return new variable.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_memmodel_check): Add.
(TARGET_MEMMODEL_MASK): Replace with
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
