Il 13/10/2012 00:25, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
1) computing liveness with REG_EQUAL included prior RD that means a lot
of shuffling of REG_DEAD notes
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
this patch provides an alternate pattern to let combine recognize scalar
operations that preserve the high part of a vector. If the strategy is all
right, I could do the same for more operations (mul, div, ...).
Today appears to be RTL loop optimizer patch day, because here's
another patch...
The problem here is that variable expansion does not update REG_EQUAL
notes when it performs replacement of the renamed register.
I fixed this by using validate_replace_rtx_group(). There is already
code in
On 5 October 2012 11:35, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 5 October 2012 01:06, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The only patches to gcc proper are
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok for the idea. If we have a problem later, we could fix it. I'll look at
the next version of the patch when you send it to give your the final
approval.
Great, thanks!
Here is the updated patch, tested in the
Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com writes:
aux-infoFILE /* we could accept this to be compatible with some
options like -B */
Concatenated option arguments (without separators like '=' or '-')
should only ever be used for single character options.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
this patch provides an alternate pattern to let combine recognize scalar
operations that preserve the high part of a vector. If the strategy is all
right, I could do the
On 14 October 2012 13:38, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com writes:
aux-infoFILE /* we could accept this to be compatible with some
options like -B */
Concatenated option arguments (without separators like '=' or '-')
should only ever be
Hello!
2012-10-14 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.md: Remove empty predicates and/or constraints.
* config/alpha/sync.md: Ditto.
Tested on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
a.diff.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Hi,
testcase added, issue closed as fixed. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2012-10-14 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/52643
* g++.dg/opt/pr52643.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/opt/pr52643.C
Hello,
Today appears to be RTL loop optimizer patch day, because here's
another patch...
The problem here is that variable expansion does not update REG_EQUAL
notes when it performs replacement of the renamed register.
Hehe. or rather REG_EQUAL patch day :)
It makes me wonder how much of
Hi,
Index: optabs.c
===
--- optabs.c(revision 191879)
+++ optabs.c(working copy)
@@ -4249,7 +4249,7 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int
we can do the branch. */
static void
-emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that instead of
if (cgraph_node *q = p-cast_to cgraph_node * ())
we want
if ((q = cast_to cgraph_node * (p))
I see absolutely no good reason to make cast_to a member, given
that the
Hi,
the update of RTL optimizers to use SCEV's loop bounds make them to be
inexpectedly active.
One of reasons is invalid. For loop
int *a;
int t()
{
int i;
for (i=0;i100;i++)
if (a[i])
return 1;
return 0;
}
We get realistic number of iteration estimate to be 999. This
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. The additional
testcase was not failing before, but tests for something that the
current testsuite does not.
OK?
2012-10-14 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR c/53063
PR c/40989
gcc/
* optc-gen.awk: Handle
On 12-10-14 6:16 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok for the idea. If we have a problem later, we could fix it. I'll look at
the next version of the patch when you send it to give your the final
approval.
Great, thanks!
On 12-10-12 11:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
The following patch implements most Richard's proposals for LRA
lra-spills.c and lra-coalesce.c files.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192389.
The following patch adds a new interpretation of hint * for LRA.
2012-10-14 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* doc/tm.texi: Add new interpretation of hint * for LRA.
Committed as rev. 192436.
Index: doc/md.texi
===
On 12-10-13 11:37 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 23:53 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Is the following comment better?
Presence of any pseudo in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE does not affect value
of insn_bitmap of the corresponding lra_reg_info. That is because we
don't need to
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 07:46 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
Uhm, yes, I forgot to add the -fschedule-insns and -mprefergot options.
Regarding the -Os option, I think it's better to test this one at
multiple optimization levels, just in case. I've looked
Hi,
testcase added, issue closed as fixed. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2012-10-14 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/53581
* g++.dg/template/crash113.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/template/crash113.C
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Tested with a bootstrapped compiler. Test coverage isn't great,
because variable expansion is not enabled by default.
Are there particular reasons to not enable it? It seems like usefull
optimization.
I don't know of any reason not to
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
OK, thanks (if you also add the testcase to gcc.dg with the special options).
Thanks, committed as trunk r192439.
Ciao!
Steven
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Thanks, Steven. IRA part is ok for me to commit.
Thanks, I've committed this as trunk r192440. I'm aware I'm on the
hook for fixing any fall-out :-)
Ciao!
Steven
insv, extv and extzv have an unusual interface: the structure operand is
supposed to have word_mode if stored in registers or byte_mode if stored
in memory. Andrew's patch to try different insv modes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00126.html
prompted me to try making the
Hi,
here is an updated patch. The idea of splitting loopback edge did not fly. We
then remove the edge in cfgcleanup prior demolyshing the loop and we loose
track on what basic blocks needs updating because we no longer can get the loop
body.
As a good news however I do not need the changed
Partnering the store_bit_field_1 patch that I just posted, this patch
tidies up the extract_bit_field code in the same way.
There is one deliberate behavioural change here. The old code had a
single check for cases where the extraction could be done as a simple
move. It started:
if
Hello,
This patch is a back-port of one of the scalability improvements I
made to perform, well, maybe not well but at least not so poorly on
the test case of PR54146, which has an extremely large function.
The problem in ifcvt.c has two parts. The first is that clearing
several arrays of
Hello,
The attached patch adds documentation for SH specific function
attributes which haven't been documented yet.
Tested with 'make info dvi pdf'.
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/sh/sh.c: Update function attribute comments.
* doc/extend.texi (function_vector):
Hi,
This is the execution failure of gfortran.dg/array_constructor_4.f90 in 64-bit
mode on SPARC/Solaris at -O3. The dse2 dump for the reduced testcase reads:
dse: local deletions = 0, global deletions = 1, spill deletions = 0
starting the processing of deferred insns
deleting insn with uid =
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Can we just simulate liveness for web, and drop REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV
notes that refer to a dead pseudo?
I don't think we want to do that. A REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV note can use a
pseudo that isn't live and still be valid. Consider a simple
Back then, I must've missed that INCOMING_REGNO / OUTGOING_REGNO are
used to map return-value-register/s too. Fixes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-apply4.c execution test
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-return-1.c execution test
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c -O0 execution test
FAIL:
I don't think we want to do that. A REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV note can use a
pseudo that isn't live and still be valid. Consider a simple example
like this:
a = b + 3
// b dies here
c = a {REG_EQUAL b+3}
The REG_EQUAL note is valid and may help optimization. Removing it
just because b is
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I don't think we want to do that. A REG_EQUAL/REG_EQUIV note can use a
pseudo that isn't live and still be valid. Consider a simple example
like this:
a = b + 3
// b dies here
c = a {REG_EQUAL b+3}
The REG_EQUAL note is valid and may
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias Schlüter
tobias.schlue...@physik.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
Hi,
first a question also to non-gfortraners: if I want to use std::map, where
do I #include map? In system.h?
Now to the patch-specific part: in this PR, module files are produced with
random
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:35:27AM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Tobias Schlüter
I'm putting forward two patches. One uses a C++ map to very concisely build
up and handle the ordered list of symbols. This has three problems:
1) gfortran maintainers may not
On 10 October 2012 22:57, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 10/10/12 03:11, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:02, Janis Johnson wrote:
Test gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c is known to fail for GNU/Linux
targets, as described in
LRA branch was merged with trunk @192442. Committed as rev. 192446.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
Suppose you drop this into include/libiberty.h:
#ifdef __cplusplus
inline char *lbasename(char *s) { return const_castchar*(lbasename (s)); }
#endif
That doesn't work:
The following patch is still awaiting review:
2011-09-19 Jorn Rennecke joern.renne...@arc.com
* genoutput.c (process_template): Process '*' in '@' alternatives.
* doc/md.texi (node Output Statement): Provide example for the above.
2012-09-26 Jorn Rennecke joern.renne...@arc.com
* loop-doloop.c (doloop_modify): Pass doloop_end pattern to
gen_doloop_begin.
* loop-doloop.c (doloop_optimize): Pass flag to indicate if loop is
entered at top to gen_doloop_end.
* config/arm/thumb2.md
2012-10-02 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* web.c (union_match_dups): Properly handle OP_INOUT match_dups.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00189.html
2012-10-04 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* final.c (get_attr_length_1): Use direct recursion rather than
calling get_attr_length.
(get_attr_lock_length): New function.
(INSN_VARIABLE_LENGTH_P): Define.
(shorten_branches): Take
43 matches
Mail list logo
