On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:16 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, I was going to merge LRA into trunk last Sunday. It did not happen.
LRA was actively changed last 4 weeks by implementing reviewer's proposals
On 10/26/2012 06:48 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Ralf Corsepius schrieb:
I've applied the patch below to trunk and gcc-4.7-branch.
It contains 2 RTEMS specific cleanups which have been in use for
avr-rtems for quite a while.
Ralf
2012-10-26 Ralf Corsépius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org
*
From: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:59:58 -0700
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:16 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi, I was going to merge LRA into trunk last Sunday. It did not happen.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:59:58 -0700
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:16 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:15:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should there be a -fno-ira option before reload pass is
removed? It will be useful to investiage IRA regressions.
You mean -fno-lra, and s/IRA/LRA/, right? I think the reason for no
compiler switch is that while returning false from
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:53 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:57 PM,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:15:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should there be a -fno-ira option before reload pass is
removed? It will be useful to investiage IRA regressions.
You mean -fno-lra, and s/IRA/LRA/, right? I
Both jump threading and loop induction variable optimizations were
dropping useful debug information, and it took improvements in both for
debug info about relevant variables in the enclosed testcase to survive
all the way to the end.
The first problem was that jump threading could bypass blocks
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/25/2012 05:45 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi Vlad,
As discussed in the reviews, one of the things that worried me was the
combination of:
1) the displacement fixup code in
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:30:41AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
From: Alexandre Oliva lxol...@fsfla.org
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR debug/54693
* config/i386/i386.c (add_parameter_dependencies): Stop
backward scan at the insn before the incoming head.
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some
poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc.
In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we
would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them.
Also, these were matching 'reg' objects
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:40:08 +0200
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some
poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc.
In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we
would not get a true return
With Richard Sandiford's address decomposition patch, Sparc
looks really good on the 32-bit side. This is the patch I
am using.
2012-10-25 David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_lra_p): New function.
(sparc_spill_class): New function.
On 10/26/2012 07:57 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/26/2012 06:48 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Ralf Corsepius schrieb:
I've applied the patch below to trunk and gcc-4.7-branch.
It contains 2 RTEMS specific cleanups which have been in use for
avr-rtems for quite a while.
Ralf
2012-10-26 Ralf
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:52 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Please take a look at the attached patch.
I changed the asm-pattern implementation according to your recomendation.
Changed the name of feature option
Sorry HJ, I got your message just after committing.
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
Please try your patch on Linux/ia32 with go enabled. There is
one go test which runs for a long time:
8149 hjl 20 0 49388 40m 9.8m R 99.3 0.3 15:18.35 go1
and it is still running.
Are you
On Oct 18, 2012, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2012-10-18 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR debug/54970
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Expand MEM_REF[var, n]
as DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR + n if var expands to DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR.
* tree-sra.c
Thanks for catching this. Also the comment at the top can now mention
the now-available constraint letter as well.
Ah, yes. And doc/md.texi be adjusted accordingly.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric and Rainer, I think that functionally this patch is fully ready
to go into the tree except for the Solaris aspects which I do not have
the means to work on. Have either of you made any progress in this
area?
Not yet, but I'll have a look at the beginning of next week.
Some remarks:
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:04:13 +0200
With Richard Sandiford's address decomposition patch, Sparc
looks really good on the 32-bit side. This is the patch I
am using.
2012-10-25 David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
* config/sparc/sparc.c
But honestly I think the cbcond patch has higher priority, are you
going to work on those solaris bits?
Yes, I'll at least make sure that the patch can be installed without breaking
the Solaris port.
--
Eric Botcazou
David Miller da...@davemloft.net writes:
Eric and Rainer, I think that functionally this patch is fully ready
to go into the tree except for the Solaris aspects which I do not have
the means to work on. Have either of you made any progress in this
area?
Just wondering if either of you have
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:57 +0200
@@ -1088,7 +1093,12 @@ sparc_option_override (void)
if (TARGET_VIS3)
target_flags |= MASK_VIS2 | MASK_VIS;
- /* Don't allow -mvis, -mvis2, -mvis3, or -mfmaf if FPU is disabled. */
+ /* -mcbcond implies
Hi,
the following patch fixes PR 54971 by creating extra
for-debug-statements-only declarations for parts of aggregates that
are never read and then creates debug bind statements so that the
value of the non-used part is accessible from debug info.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux without
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:22:54AM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
the following patch fixes PR 54971 by creating extra
for-debug-statements-only declarations for parts of aggregates that
are never read and then creates debug bind statements so that the
value of the non-used part is accessible
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Shawcroft
Sent: 15 October 2012 12:37
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [AArch64] Add vcond, vcondu support.
On 09/10/12 12:08, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
Change hash_table to support a comparator type different from the
value type stored in the hash table. The 'find' functions now may
take a different type from the value type. This requires introducing
a second typedef
Hi,
So, the patch is OK for mainline (with -mxsave removed from sse-X tests).
Please commit the patch to mainline SVN.
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00963.html
Thanks, K
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:30 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:15:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should there be a -fno-ira option before reload pass is
removed? It will be useful to investiage
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Shawcroft
Sent: 15 October 2012 12:35
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [AArch64] Refactor Advanced SIMD builtin
initialisation.
On 05/10/12 16:52,
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
+ location_t location = gimple_location (call);
I'd call the var just loc, that is far more commonly used and shorter.
Done.
+ /* If we initially had an instruction like:
+
+ int n = strlen (str)
+
+ we now want to instrument the access
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
* asan.c (insert_if_then_before_iter, instrument_mem_region_access,
(instrument_strlen_call, maybe_instrument_builtin_call,
(maybe_instrument_call): New static functions.
(create_cond_insert_point): Renamed
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Sorry HJ, I got your message just after committing.
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
Please try your patch on Linux/ia32 with go enabled. There is
one go test which runs for a long time:
8149 hjl 20 0 49388 40m 9.8m R 99.3
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Sorry HJ, I got your message just after committing.
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
Please try your patch on Linux/ia32 with go enabled. There is
one
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:33:07AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
You are right. reflect test took a long time to compile.
It has nothing to with LRA.
About the nothing to do with LRA I'm not sure, because on Tuesday my
make -j48 -k check (slowish 16way box, yes,rtl checking) took just 30
minutes and
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:30 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:15:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Should there be
If it were not approved yet by an insn scheduler maintainer, it is ok for
me. As Uros wrote that he rubberstamps the patch if a scheduler maintainer
approves it, so you can commit it into the mainline.
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00965.html
K
Hello,
here is a test case for PR55033.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese
This is the 2nd try fixing fallout of preserving loop structure over
tracer. It makes tracer call fix_loop_structure explicitely
(instead of relying on some cfghook setting LOOPS_NEED_FIXUP), it is
quite expected that fixups are needed.
But then we run into the issue that fix_loop_structure
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany k...@google.com wrote:
One thing I overlooked before.
In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
-f[no-]address-sanitizer
(it used to be -fasan in early patches, but was renamed before submitting to
trunk).
Do we want
On 10/25/2012 09:15 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm not sure the testcase can't be improved, I'm not very familiar with
dg-final.
You could do an execution test using a user-defined operator new which
initializes the memory to something other than 0. OK with that change.
Also, in case we
This caused
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
--
Roman Zhuykov
I noticed that in r151350, Micheal changed from set_expr_location_r to
SET_EXPR_LOCATION. Any insights why the recursive call is replaced?
Looks to me if we reset the location for first level expr here, there
is no reason that we don't reset expr for deeper levels. Or shall we
simply remove
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com
wrote:
Yes, the support is only for C++ for now. target attribute is not
new and if the user tries to use this with 'C' then a duplicate
defintion error would occur just like now.
I have plans to implement this for C too.
Hi,
On 10/26/2012 02:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/25/2012 09:15 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm not sure the testcase can't be improved, I'm not very familiar with
dg-final.
You could do an execution test using a user-defined operator new which
initializes the memory to something other
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Dehao Chen wrote:
* cfgexpand.c (set_expr_location_r): New callback function.
(gimple_assign_rhs_to_tree): Walk the expr recursively.
(expand_call_stmt): Likewise.
(expand_gimple_stmt_1): Likewise.
This cannot be right. You're going to propagate a toplevel
Committed.
2012-10-26 Edward Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
* include/std/system_error (system_error(error_code, const char*),
system_error(int, const error_category, const char*)): New.
* include/std/stdexcept ( logic_error(const char*),
domain_error(const
Currently gcc trunk fails to bootstrap on powerpc-apple-darwin9, using the
default
system compiler, in libbacktrace due to the absence of _Unwind_GetIPInfo() in
the
unwind.h header of Apple gcc 4.0.1 compiler. The attached patch eliminates this
failure by enhancing the configure.ac test for
On 10/26/2012 04:11 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Committed.
I can't find the message actually approving the patch. And personally
I'm a bit nervous about it.
Paolo.
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 15:00 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:57:38PM -0700, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
for most others. This patch disables all lwa insns in 32-bit mode.
We can later re-enable it if the assembler used handles it properly,
Well, you can now do that.
On 10/26/2012 10:26 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/26/2012 04:11 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Committed.
I can't find the message actually approving the patch. And personally
I'm a bit nervous about it.
Paolo.
Sorry, i though it was OK. Do you want me to roll back? do you want to?
Ed
On 10/26/2012 10:26 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/26/2012 04:11 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Committed.
I can't find the message actually approving the patch. And personally
I'm a bit nervous about it.
Paolo.
Well, the commit had failed anyway... ChangeLog out of date.
So I'll wait.
Ed
On 10/26/2012 04:36 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/26/2012 10:26 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/26/2012 04:11 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Committed.
I can't find the message actually approving the patch. And personally
I'm a bit nervous about it.
Paolo.
Sorry, i though it was OK. Do
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
libbacktrace/
2012-10-26 Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu
target/PR55061
* configure.ac: Check for _Unwind_GetIPInfo function declaration.
* configure: Regenerate.
This is OK.
Hi Steve,
It looks like there is another patch that has not been
checked in to the GCC top level tree but not binutils and a patch
in binutils but not GCC. Is there any automation for this or is
it still up to each person checking in files to copy stuff over
by hand?
As far as I know it is
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Ping.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes bugs introduced by my previous patch to propagate
profiles during switch expansion. Bootstrap and
Yes.
David
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany k...@google.com wrote:
One thing I overlooked before.
In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
-f[no-]address-sanitizer
(it used to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:48:10AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Yes.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany k...@google.com wrote:
One thing I overlooked before.
In the gcc patch we are using -fasan
yes -- there is no need to change any developer only internal names.
David
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:48:10AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Yes.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
sorry for jumping in late, for too long I did not had chnce to look at my TODO.
I have two comments...
Index: gcc/cgraphbuild.c
===
--- gcc/cgraphbuild.c (revision 192623)
+++ gcc/cgraphbuild.c (working copy)
@@ -34,6 +34,7
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
sorry for jumping in late, for too long I did not had chnce to look at my
TODO.
I have two comments...
Index: gcc/cgraphbuild.c
===
--- gcc/cgraphbuild.c
Hi,
inliner knows that removing external function is not going to save any code,
but it should also know that inlining into external function that is itself
not inline (yet) does not cost you anything either.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
Index: ipa-inline-transform.c
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
sorry for jumping in late, for too long I did not had chnce to look at my
TODO.
I have two comments...
Index: gcc/cgraphbuild.c
On 10/26/12, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 2012 Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
Change hash_table to support a comparator type different from the
value type stored in the hash table. The 'find' functions now
may take a different type from the value
Hi!
This patch extends optimize_range_tests optimization, so that it
handles also the cases where the truth or || has been gimplifed
as a series of GIMPLE_CONDs or mixture thereof and BIT_{AND,IOR}_EXPR
stmts.
Example of code it handles is e.g.:
bb 2:
v1_3 = a_2(D) != 3;
v2_4 = a_2(D) !=
On 10/23/2012 03:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:34:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I think it should be backported to 4.7, perhaps with a few days delay after the
trunk commit.
Do we even have debug statements after control flow statements?
They shouldn't be there, so if
Hello,
In this PR, G++ embarrassingly fails to parse the simple alignas
expression below:
alignas(double) int f;
even though the simple-declaration production in Clause 7 suggests
otherwise.
Fixed thus and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
gcc/cp
PR c++/54955
On 10/26/2012 12:30 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Propagate debug stmts for jump threading
From: Alexandre Olivalxol...@fsfla.org
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR debug/54693
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_around_empty_block): Copy
debug temps from predecessor before threading.
So
Uros investigated a libgo testsuite failure on Alpha GNU/Linux that
looked like a GC bug but turned out to simply be a testsuite bug. In Go
when the garbage collector collects an os.File it closes the file
descriptor. The syscall/creds_test test would call socketpair(), and
defer closing both
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:42:20AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/26/2012 12:30 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Propagate debug stmts for jump threading
for gcc/ChangeLog
PR debug/54693
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_around_empty_block): Copy
debug temps from predecessor before
Hello!
Attached patch introduces __builtin_ia32_fxsave to crtfastmath.c. In
addition, it clears only fxsave.mxcsr_mask, as we will look at this
field only. Also, we don't have to execute additional stmxcsr, since
fxsave also saves this register.
2012-10-26 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
On 10/26/2012 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The debug stmts are already in SSA form, and, being debug stmts, they are
always just consumers of SSA names, not defining stmts, and Alex' patch
is just copying them over from a predecessor bb to a successor bb that
has a single predecessor (the one
On 10/22/2012 02:15 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:16 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at
Hi!
If DCE is not going to remove some insn, as it is needed, but the pseudo
it sets is REG_DEAD before some debug insn which uses the pseudo, DCE +
valtrack still insert a debug temporary before the insn with the value
instead of after it with the pseudo it sets. This is undesirable if
SET_SRC
Gunther Nikl gn...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
The patch should be installed on trunk and on the 4.7 branch.
Thanks, done. The 4.7 branch required some adjustment, since it's not
compiled as C++.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B
Currently targets like darwin which use older assemblers which lack support for
the
-masm=intel command line option fail these tests. The attached patch adds a
proc for
check_effective_target_masm_intel to target-supports.exp and uses it in the
gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-1.c test case. Tested
Hi!
The SIZEOF_EXPR delayed folding caused another problem as the following
testcase shows for -std=c++98. Fixed by always performing
maybe_constant_init, even for C++98. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2012-10-26 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
I have not been able to recreate PR 55087, but it seems to be pointing
out a case where libbacktrace is issuing an error attempting to open a
shared library that does not exist (in this case it's the VDSO library,
which never exists in the file system as far as I know). This patch to
libbacktrace
OK.
Jason
On 10/26/2012 01:37 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
cp_next_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (cp_parser *parser)
{
- return cp_nth_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (parser, 1);
+ cp_token *token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser-lexer);
+
+ return (cxx_dialect = cxx0x
+ (token-type == CPP_KEYWORD
On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
Currently targets like darwin which use older assemblers which lack support
for the
-masm=intel command line option fail these tests. The attached patch adds a
proc for
check_effective_target_masm_intel to
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:33:07AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
You are right. reflect test took a long time to compile.
It has nothing to with LRA.
About the nothing to do with LRA I'm not sure, because on Tuesday my
make -j48
A long standing issue with Wconversion. Fixed thusly. Bootstrapped and
regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK?
2012-10-26 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR c/51294
c-family/
* c-common.c (conversion_warning): Handle conditional expressions.
testsuite/
*
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 07:27:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This patch extends optimize_range_tests optimization, so that it
handles also the cases where the truth or || has been gimplifed
as a series of GIMPLE_CONDs or mixture thereof and BIT_{AND,IOR}_EXPR
stmts.
Some statistics from
Hi,
I've updated the patch:
1. abandon the changes in cfgexpand.c
2. set the block for trees when lowering gimple stmt.
3. add a unittest.
However, this patch will trigger two lto bug when asserting
LTO_NO_PREVAIL for TREE_CHAIN. After debugging for a while, I found
that the problem was also
Commited.
* config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_as_legitimate_address): Do not allow
reg+addend addresses for the _far namespace.
Index: gcc/config/rl78/rl78.c
===
--- gcc/config/rl78/rl78.c (revision 192862)
+++
LRA branch was merged with trunk @ 192861.
It was successfully bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192865.
The following patch implements a flag (-flra/-fno-lra) to switch on/off
LRA for targets on which it was ported. By default, LRA is switch on.
The flag is not documented as it will not live for a long time.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev 192867.
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes:
Index: trans.c
===
--- trans.c (revision 192638)
+++ trans.c (working copy)
@@ -814,26 +814,23 @@ gfc_allocate_allocatable (stmtblock_t * block, tre
}
-/* Free a given
This patch implements generic type query and conversion functions,
and applies them to the use of cgraph_node, varpool_node, and symtab_node.
The functions are:
bool is_a TYPE (pointer)
Tests whether the pointer actually points to a more derived TYPE.
TYPE *as_a TYPE (pointer)
Converts
On 10/25/12, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
This patch implements the unification of the *bitmap interfaces as
discussed.
Essentially, we rename ebitmap and sbitmap functions to use the same names
as the bitmap functions. This rename works because we can now overload
on the bitmap
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:53 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:57 PM,
While I was here I filled in some gaps in the documentation.
Committed to master.
* config/sparc/constraints.md: Update unused letter list, move
w near other memory constraints. Remove no longer relevant
comment.
* doc/md.texi: Sync sparc constraint
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:54 AM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Fix test case failure reported in PR54989
On 10/22/2012 02:15 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
I'm getting a SIGBUS on every backtrace libbacktrace generates
on 32-bit sparc builds. The crashes usually happen in
add_function_range(), where 'p' is not 8-byte aligned.
It seems that the vector code doesn't take care to align the pointers
it returns. I cribbed the size alignment done in
for most others. This patch disables all lwa insns in 32-bit mode.
We can later re-enable it if the assembler used handles it properly,
Well, you can now do that. Mainline gas and ld are now fixed.
Yes, you are much too quick for me to keep up. Thank you!
Now that gas and ld are fixed,
96 matches
Mail list logo
