Ping
2012/12/21 Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com:
Hello,
this patch fixes the layout of the info_type-s for llp64 target. We
used here 'long' type instead
of pointer-scalar-witdth type. That's an issue for llp64 targets.
I introduced for that the LONGPTR_T helper-macro, which has either
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Can you please post a real-world example, where using %r15 would break
existing code?
I used to run into problems like this when porting code to gcc from icc or VC.
A lot of hyper optimized inline assembler snippets wants
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Can you please post a real-world example, where using %r15 would break
existing code?
I used to run into problems like this when porting code to gcc
* Uros Bizjak:
+#elif defined(__x86_64__)
+#define __cpuid(level, a, b, c, d) \
+ __asm__ (xchg{q}\t{%%}rbx, %q1\n\t \
+cpuid\n\t \
+xchg{q}\t{%%}rbx, %q1\n\t \
+: =a (a), =r
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Uros Bizjak:
+#elif defined(__x86_64__)
+#define __cpuid(level, a, b, c, d) \
+ __asm__ (xchg{q}\t{%%}rbx, %q1\n\t \
+cpuid\n\t \
+
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 148388d..575e03a 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
- .mine
+2012-12-27 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
+
+ * target.def (supports_function_versions): Fix typo.
+
2012-12-26 Sriraman Tallam
Dear Jerry,
thanks for the patch.However, I wonder about the following:
Will that be backward compatible with binaries compiled with GCC 4.8
or will that cause problems? I have the feeling that it is okay as the
flag (cf2) indicating whether stream= is present has still the same
type and
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:29:42AM -0500, Anthony Green wrote:
I've committed this patch.
Thanks,
Anthony Green
Anthony,
Did you run make check in libffi on this merge? These changes
appear to have broken the dejagnu testing in libffi...
# make -k check
Password:
Making check in
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
Did you run make check in libffi on this merge? These changes
appear to have broken the dejagnu testing in libffi...
The problem is the wrong definition of load_gcc_lib.
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
proc load_gcc_lib { filename } {
global srcdir
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
Did you run make check in libffi on this merge? These changes
appear to have broken the dejagnu testing in libffi...
The problem is the wrong definition of load_gcc_lib.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
(I suppose somehow gmp.h is pulled in
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:19:57AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
Did you run make check in libffi on this merge? These changes
appear to have broken the dejagnu testing in
On 12/27/2012 03:12 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Dear Jerry,
thanks for the patch.However, I wonder about the following:
Will that be backward compatible with binaries compiled with GCC 4.8 or will
that cause problems? I have the feeling that it is okay as the flag (cf2)
indicating whether
This patch gets GCC support for native TLS on AIX working and passing
most tests.
The patch shifts the creation of the qualified symbol name from
output_toc() to rs6000_legitimize_tls_address_aix(). I was hoping that
the separate SYMBOL_REF would prevent RTL fwprop from becoming
confused about
OK.
Jason
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 148388d..575e03a 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
- .mine
+2012-12-27 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
+
+ * target.def
*ping*
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-12/msg00167.html
Tobias Burnus:
Fix one of the remaining issues of PR 55763: MOVE_ALLOC with CLASS(*)
either for both arguments or only for TO=.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
Dear all,
See also the discussion in the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-12/msg00135.html
a) The Fortran standard only defines LOGICAL(kind=C_Bool) as being
interoperable with C - no other LOGICAL type. That matches GCC: With gcc
(the C compiler) only _Bool is a
On 27/12/2012, at 1:15 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Hi,
Currently Android dynamic loader does not support indirect functions
(And I don't think that
it will someday). But there is no way for us to specify that for gcc,
and for example, tests like
gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-* are failing on
On 12/20/12, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
This patch started when I noticed that it's not possibly to construct
a shared_ptrT from unique_ptrT[], D, then I discovered we don't
use D::pointer if it exists, and there were a number of other
non-conformance issues with our
Hi,
The attached patch fixes this problem by not calling hit_eof if EOF can be a
valid separator.
Regression tested on x86-64.
OK for trunk with test case from PR?
Regards,
Jerry
2012-12-27 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
PR libfortran/55818
* io/list_read.c
I'm sorry - I didn't notice that it works only for c++ frontend. It
works for me now!
thanks,
Alexander
2012/12/27 Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index
22 matches
Mail list logo
