On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:04:44PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:44:46PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Alan Modra writes:
> > > Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. OK mainline and 4.8 branch?
> > >
> > > * configure.ac (BUILD_CXXFLAGS) Don't use ALL_CXXFLAGS for
> > > bu
Hello,
On 05 Dec 16:40, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> On 05 Dec 05:30, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Kirill, can you take a look why it doesn't work for x86?
> Okay, I'll look at this.
I've looked at this. It seems that `CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS'
is too conservative for x86.
In rtlanal.c we have `simplify_subreg_
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 12/06/13 19:44, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>>
>>> Right. Based on reading the archives, it looks like this stuff is/was
>>> generated by PRE. I also suspect jump threading can create them. There
>>> was
>>> talk of throttling PRE to leave things in a
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:44:46PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Alan Modra writes:
> > Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. OK mainline and 4.8 branch?
> >
> > * configure.ac (BUILD_CXXFLAGS) Don't use ALL_CXXFLAGS for
> > build != host.
> > : Clear GMPINC. Don't bother
> > saving CF
On 12/07/13 03:44, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I'd certainly be concerned. Ports have (for better or worse) keyed on
BLKmode rather than looking at the underlying types. So if something
which was previously SImode or DImode is now BLKmode, there's a nonzero
chance we're going to change how it gets pas
On 12/06/13 19:44, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Right. Based on reading the archives, it looks like this stuff is/was
generated by PRE. I also suspect jump threading can create them. There was
talk of throttling PRE to leave things in a form that the IV analysis could
more easily digest, but I'm not sure
Hello,
This is a summary of what has been happening on the SH side during 4.9.
Applied.
Cheers,
Oleg
? sh_changes_49_1.patch
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving r
Hello,
The attached patch deprecates the SH options mcbranchdi and mcmpeqdi,
since they turn out to be not so useful.
For example, disabling the cbranchdi pattern results in worse code for
-Os than -O1 and enabling the cmpeqdi patterns seems to trigger
broken/incomplete code paths. Effectively th
On 7 December 2013 17:28, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc execution test
>>>
>>> async.exe:
>>> /usr/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc:66: void
>
On 12/08/13 13:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Lovely. Thank you very much!
$ svn diff
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 205790)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -1319,10 +1319,17 @@
# Used for setting
Adjusted for Richard Biener's patch
Index: fixincludes/ChangeLog
===
--- fixincludes/ChangeLog (revision 205790)
+++ fixincludes/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2013-12-07 Bruce Korb
+
+ * inclhack.def: many of the heade
Hello!
2013-12-08 Uros Bizjak
* gcc.dg/macro-fusion-1.c: Cleanup sched2 rtl dump.
* gcc.dg/macro-fusion-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-10a.c: Cleanup vect tree dump.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-12a.c: Ditto.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN
Hi Janus,
Janus Weil wrote:
first off: I assume the first PR number in the subject line is wrong,
since I don't see how it is related to your patch. I guess you meant
58099?
Yes. Well spotted.
a) It ensures that sym->attr.pure/elemental gets set for pure/elemental
intrinsics (isym->pure/elem
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 07:18:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/
> * lib/asan-dg.exp (asan-gtest): Remove actual and expected output
> from the pass/fail line and add it to the log instead.
Looks ok to me, except the ChangeLog, all I'm seeing is that you are
removing
And here the web page update for Mark's departure and Joseph
joining.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: steering.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/steering.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -3 -p -r1.36 steering.html
--- steerin
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:31:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> --- gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp(revision 205654)
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp(working copy)
>> @@ -288,9 +288,10 @@
>> if { "$status" == "fail" } {
>>
Hi Tobias,
first off: I assume the first PR number in the subject line is wrong,
since I don't see how it is related to your patch. I guess you meant
58099?
> This patch is about rejects-valid and accepts-invalid and does essentially
> only:
>
> a) It ensures that sym->attr.pure/elemental gets s
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:31:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> --- gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp (revision 205654)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp (working copy)
> @@ -288,9 +288,10 @@
> if { "$status" == "fail" } {
> pass "$testname executi
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Patch updated with two more tests to check if the vfmadd insn is being
> produced when possible.
>
> Thanks
> Sri
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have attached a patch to fix
>> http://gcc.gnu.
This patch is about rejects-valid and accepts-invalid and does
essentially only:
a) It ensures that sym->attr.pure/elemental gets set for pure/elemental
intrinsics (isym->pure/elemental).
b) It rejects dummy procedures / procedure pointers which are ELEMENTAL.
* * *
To quote (link see PR) fr
Richard Sandiford writes:
> I sent a patch to upstream dejagnu so that things like:
>
> FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -Os output pattern test, is
> ==4731
> ==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504)
> byte
> s at address 0x02008fff7000 (12)
> ==4
I sent a patch to upstream dejagnu so that things like:
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -Os output pattern test, is ==4731
==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) byte
s at address 0x02008fff7000 (12)
==4731==ReserveShadowMemoryRange failed while t
Richard Sandiford wrote:
>Kenneth Zadeck writes:
>>#define WIDE_INT_MAX_ELTS \
>> - ((4 * MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT + HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1) \
>> - / HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
>> + (((MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT + HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1) \
>> +/ HOST_BITS_PE
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> That being said, the concern is certainly valid so we may want to go
>for a
>> kludge instead of the fix. The point is that the kludge should do
>exactly
>> what the fix would have done in the RTL expander and nothing more;
>it's out
>> of question to pessimize all the oth
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> It's not fully fixing the issue as _all_ aggregates that may be
>> accessed beyond their declarations size are broken.
>
>Sure, but we don't need to support such nonsense in the general case.
>And not
>every language allows it, for example in Ada you cannot do that of
>co
25 matches
Mail list logo
