On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:29:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01370.html
PR sanitizer/56781
fix --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap of lto-plugin
I have no particular problem with this patch, although the build has
gotten
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on ia64-suse-linux and installed as obvious.
Please don't add the TLS symbols in there, they aren't included
in any of the linux baselines so that there aren't failures in
--disable-tls configurations or when using too old
Hi!
I've committed several backports patches from trunk to 4.8 branch after
bootstrapping/regtesting them on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Jakub
2014-04-10 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Backport from mainline
2014-03-06 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Hi,
the hoist-register-pressure testcases currently fail on S/390 since
the rtl hoist pass requires that the expression to be hoisted can be
assigned without clobbering cc. We do not have a 32 bit add which
does not clobber cc.
On 64 bit we might use load address if the operands are DImode. On
Hi!
This backport didn't apply cleanly, because 4.8 doesn't have
build_all_ones_cst function.
So, either we can apply something like the patch below
(bootstrapped/regtested with the other backports), or as another
alternative I see backport the addition of build_minus_one_cst
and
Hi,
This fixes the tail of PR60655 where there were still issues without
-fdata-sections despite the fix in const_ok_for_output_1. For now, given
the pressure to get 4.9 out of the door, it's probably best to handle
this in the backend and reject constants that cannot be handled by GAS.
For
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on ia64-suse-linux and installed as obvious.
Please don't add the TLS symbols in there, they aren't included
in any of the linux baselines
Actually, there are some:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on ia64-suse-linux and installed as obvious.
Please don't add the TLS symbols in there, they aren't included
in
On April 10, 2014 10:02:29 AM CEST, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
This backport didn't apply cleanly, because 4.8 doesn't have
build_all_ones_cst function.
So, either we can apply something like the patch below
(bootstrapped/regtested with the other backports), or as another
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I'd say so, perhaps with the exception of Solaris where I'd leave that to
the target maintainer to decide.
Done.
The other alternative is to have the TLS symbols included everywhere and add
some magic to the abi checking scripts/proglet which would
4.9 changes for ARM / AArch64. Sorry it's taken me a while to get this
out but better late than never :)
Ok ?
Ramana
--
Ramana Radhakrishnan
Principal Engineer
ARM Ltd.Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I'd say so, perhaps with the exception of Solaris where I'd leave that to
the target maintainer to decide.
Done.
The other alternative is to have the TLS symbols included everywhere
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes end with [0-9]t.
This trick makes all names unique again.
One
Andreas Schwab sch...@suse.de writes:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
I'd say so, perhaps with the exception of Solaris where I'd leave that to
the target maintainer to decide.
Done.
I'd leave them in the solaris2.10 baselines: there are no non-TLS
toolchains there, and I'd rather
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:50:24, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
I thought about that, too. But it is likely that the pattern for array of
target class
__class_%s_%d_%d will eventually clash with the non-array target class
__class_%s
which proves that I am too sleep deprieved to
I would like to ping the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01673.html
It's a syntax issue: It simply makes no sense to have a @menu item
which points to @nodes which are at the same or higher level
than the section in which the @menu is.
Newer makeinfo rightfully complain
Hi,
the htm-builtins-compile-1.c fails on 31 bit due to compile warnings.
Fixed with the attached patch.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2014-04-10 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* gcc.target/s390/htm-builtins-compile-1.c: Replace long long with
long.
diff --git
Hi all,
This is the 4.8 version of the patch posted at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00315.html
TARGET_CRYPTO was not defined in 4.8 therefore that hunk is removed.
Ok for the 4.8 branch?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2014-04-10 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
*
On 04/09/2014 05:27 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
The doc for the format attribute says clearly:
Since non-static C++ methods have an implicit this argument, the
arguments of such methods should be counted from two, not one, when
giving values for string-index and first-to-check.
Ah. That seems
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:10 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
richi asked for a testcase for 60731, and since we didn't already
have support for tests using dlopen, I had to add it.
Does this approach make sense?
r209187
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:10:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/09/2014 04:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The names of the in-charge and not-in-charge constructor clones are
complete_ctor_identifier and base_ctor_identifier (and dtor for
destructors); you could check for those.
I was
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana@googlemail.com writes:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 10:10 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
richi asked for a testcase for 60731, and since we didn't already
have support for tests using dlopen, I
Hi!
As Honza has determined, the problem on this testcase is that
forced_by_abi flag wasn't propagated from thunk's target to the thunk
(in this case the thunk's target was forced_by_abi = true, while the
thunk mistakenly didn't have that flag set).
The following patch copies that flag in the C++
On 09.04.2014 15:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 04/09/14 09:07, Alexey Merzlyakov wrote:
On 04.04.2014 14:44, Alexey Merzlyakov wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a patch, that fixes infinite backtraces in __cxa_end_cleanup().
The Bugzilla entry for
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
I see failures from last night on aarch64-none-elf and arm-none-eabi
(both bare-metal) configurations even after moving up to dejagnu
1.5.1. If this can't be fixed easily should we consider reverting this
patch in the interest of
On 04/10/2014 09:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The following patch copies that flag in the C++ FE, another alternative
is to do that in cgraph_add_thunk function (apparently only called by
use_thunk, thus practically the same spot, or it can be done in
function_and_variable_visibility.
I think
Hi!
This fixes ICE on inappropriate usage of Cilk_sync keyword.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR c++/60189
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Make sure only
Zamyatin, Igor igor.zamya...@intel.com writes:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60467
* c-family/cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove FUNCTION_DECL
as possible argument for Cilk_spawn.
Both c-family (and cp in your other
Hi!
This patch filters out another incorrect usage of Cilk_spawn keyword.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60467
* c-family/cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove
Resending with correct Changelog.
Is it OK?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60467
* cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove FUNCTION_DECL
as possible argument for Cilk_spawn.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:20:42PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Resending with correct Changelog.
Is it OK?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60467
* cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker): Remove
Resending with correct Changelog
Is it OK?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR c++/60189
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Make sure only
semicolon can go after Cilk_sync.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:23:16PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR c++/60189
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Make sure only
semicolon can go after Cilk_sync.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin
Hi Bernd,
Post stations are not that 90's,and they charge.It took me $30 to
post the file to USA.It's so inconvenient and expensive that I can't
send a scaned version.
--
Regards
lin zuojian
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:47:56PM +0800, lin zuojian wrote:
Hi Bernd,
I am asking
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you also fix the ChangeLog?
You used gcc/ChangeLog but the proper
On April 10, 2014 3:19:42 PM CEST, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:10:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/09/2014 04:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The names of the in-charge and not-in-charge constructor clones are
complete_ctor_identifier and
Mark == Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes:
Mark Add a new lang-hook that provides the underlying base type of an
Mark ENUMERAL_TYPE. Including implementations for C and C++. Use this
Mark enum_underlying_base_type lang-hook in dwarf2out.c to add a DW_AT_type
Mark base type reference to a
But ubsan is a new feature in 4.9, and it is a bootstrap failure
with that feature.
I will leave it up to the release manager to decide if they want this
non-regression patch applied before the branch, then.
This is for the host libiberty only, and only when gcc is configured
a certain way.
On 04/10/2014 09:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Thus, I've bootstrapped/regtested this version on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux, is this ok to everybody for now?
OK.
Jason
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register
This patch adds the support for coindexed arrays in expressions (or the
RHS of assignments) to the single-image implementation of the library.
Additionally, it adds the required function definitions to the compiler.
Missing is adding the intrinsic in resolve.c – and converting it into
code in
Hi!
This patches fixes the ICE when array notation is used along with Cilk_spawn.
We need to expand AN's loop using other routine for creating temporary
variables.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64.
Also it introduces no new failures and fixes couple of ICE for CilkPlus
Conformance suite
Zamyatin, Igor igor.zamya...@intel.com writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/pr60469.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/pr60469.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..61e8014
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/pr60469.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:19:33PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
@@ -282,8 +283,7 @@ fix_builtin_array_notation_fn (tree an_builtin_fn, tree
*new_var)
for (ii = 0; ii rank; ii++)
{
- an_loop_info[ii].var = build_decl (location, VAR_DECL, NULL_TREE,
-
However it would be nice to be assured that the gcc change is ok in
principle first.
The DWARF bits are fine with me.
-cary
Fixed patch is below.
Just out of curiosity - why do you think this patch is not for 4.9?
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/c/Changelog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60469
* c-array-notation.c (fix_builtin_array_notation_fn): Use
create_tmp_var
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:16:22PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Fixed patch is below.
Just out of curiosity - why do you think this patch is not for 4.9?
The one with just create_tmp_var (integer_type_node, NULL); is
for 4.9.
For the iterator var changes, I guess one needs to analyze all the
DJ Delorie wrote:
This is for the host libiberty only, and only when gcc is configured
a certain way. The intent is to have libiberty that is going to be
linked into all the build and host tools instrumented, so that we
actually catch bugs in libiberty or bugs in host/build tools calling
Hi!
Honza has acked this patch on IRC, so I've committed it to trunk after
bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
2014-04-10 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR lto/60567
* ipa.c (function_and_variable_visibility): Copy
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Missing is adding the intrinsic in resolve.c – and converting it into
code in trans-intrinsic.c. I have a draft patch for it, but I still
need to fix something and clean up the patch.
I have now also committed a patch, which moves the existing code higher
up in the file;
On 04/10/2014 09:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2014-04-10 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/60663
* cse.c (cse_insn): Set src_volatile on ASM_OPERANDS in
PARALLEL.
* gcc.target/arm/pr60663.c: New test.
Ok if it passes.
But you're right that ARM
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:21 PM
To: Zamyatin, Igor
Cc: GCC Patches (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org); Iyer, Balaji V
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR60469, Cilk+] Fix ICE of using Cilk_spawn and Array
Notation together
On
Patch ping. This is not a regression as I can reproduce it on GCC 4.8.*
but it is an ICE on legal C code. Any chance of having it approved for
4.9?
Steve Ellcey
sell...@mips.com
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 09:48 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
This patch fixes pr60556, a GCC ICE. The problem is in
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:55:26PM +, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
So below is the patch for 4.9 trunk.
Ok, thanks.
Thanks,
Igor
gcc/c/Changelog:
2014-04-10 Igor Zamyatin igor.zamya...@intel.com
PR middle-end/60469
* c-array-notation.c (fix_builtin_array_notation_fn):
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:15:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Robert Suchanek robert.sucha...@imgtec.com writes:
I'm not particularly happy with this either. This was an attempt to fix an
ICE for
the following RTL (gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c compiled with -mips32r2
-mips16 -O1):
(insn 9 8 0 2
This patch fixes an issue where self-recursive calls were missed
during ipa inlining in LIPO compiles, since the resolved nodes were
not checked. When a self-recursive call was inlined incorrectly,
ipa_inline redirected the edge to the resolved node, leading to
a cycle in the cgraph that wasn't
Looks good to me.
David
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
This patch fixes an issue where self-recursive calls were missed
during ipa inlining in LIPO compiles, since the resolved nodes were
not checked. When a self-recursive call was inlined
Hans-Peter Nilsson: Did you have any follow up here? Or did this
response (below) address all your concerns?
I have made some minor corrections since this post:
- make dvi now builds my text without errors (can't say this for the
rest of extend.texi).
- All (instead of nearly all) the
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60769
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 209285.
2014-04-10 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/60769
* lra-constraints.c
61 matches
Mail list logo
