Hi there,
I just committed attached patch to enable build multilib for ARM
embedded-4_9-branch.
BR,
Terry
2014-05-12 Terry Guo terry@arm.com
* config.gcc (--with-multilib-list): Accept arm embedded cores.
* configure.ac (with_multilib_list): Export for being used in arm
Ping?
On May 7, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
getattrtab looses track of which file the given rtl came from during error
reporting. A port that uses multiple .md files for the port will tend to
list the last .md file processed instead of the correct md file. We
Hi DJ,
Thanks for your review earlier.
It looks OK, it's just the timing is bad. Please remind us after GCC is
back in stage1.
I am reposting this patch with GCC in stage 1.
I would also like to see an explicit initialization for the variable to
guarantee that the
default is
Ping!
On 05/05/2014 10:35 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 04/28/2014 01:35 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
On 04/25/2014 07:50 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Dimitris Papavasilioudpapa...@gmail.com
wrote:
--Wreturn-type -Wsequence-point -Wshadow @gol
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
the attached patch switches libgfortran C sources to be compiled in
gnu11 mode instead of gnu99.
Since libgfortran is compiled by the stage 3 compiler, there shouldn't
be any bootstrapping issues wrt. older (stage 1) compilers.
Ok for trunk?
OK. I do not see a real
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
the attached patch avoids a stack overflow crash due to not trying to
create a null-terminated duplicate of the argument char array on the
stack. Also, for the common case it avoids an extra allocation and an
extra memcpy.
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, Ok for
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:28:12PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
While it would be nice to support !$OMP do for do concurrent
loops, the OpenMP spec does not support it, yet. (Syntactically, it
is a not a that simple feature as do concurrent can optionally have
a MASK=, which has to be evaluated
Thomas Koenig wrote:
this contains a straightforward fix for the regression by
not trying to do combine array constructors inside
association lists.
Regression-tested. OK for all affected open branches?
OK. Thanks for the patch. (I think only 4.9 and 4.10 are
affected - and not 4.8.)
Hello,
I'd still wish to ping for the following set of patches. Those changes
does not impact other targets than SH4 but, as suggested by Joern, I
have hooked the macros and moved the SH4A specific support to the target
parts (so a different target can eventually implement other models than
dual
Just saw the Jeff's approval for the RTL part. Sorry for the crossed answers
remains the target maintainers. Joern, Kaz ?
Many thanks.
Christian
On 05/12/2014 10:44 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
Hello,
I'd still wish to ping for the following set of patches. Those changes
does not impact
2014-05-08 23:28 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in
any of the bits.
I thought it would be useful to have approved codes in the trunk to
reveal some possible problems on
2014-05-09 17:42 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 05/09/14 04:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:45 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Right. Richi
Ping? OK for trunk?
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
On 25 March 2014 16:13, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi
The patch enables shrink-wrap for apcs frame.
Bootstrap and no make check regression in ARM, THUMB1 and THUMB2 modes.
No make check regression with -g/-mapcs/-marm.
Build
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 13:17 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 12:31 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:19 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:03 -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
The DWARF bits are fine with me.
Thanks. Who can
This trivial patch fixes PR60991 by correcting the constant used to
restore Y in one of the assembler template variants used in avr_out_store_psi.
I've also added a testcase (modified from the original poster's code).
If ok, could someone commit please? I don't have commit access. It would
be
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
unnecessary though,
OK to install?
Ick. I don’t favor skip. The change feels like a premature
optimization that doesn’t net any code gen benefit. I’ll defer to a gty
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 03:22:46PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
This patch modifies AVR target's ASM spec to pass -mlink-relax to the
assembler if -mrelax is
Am 05/10/2014 02:51 AM, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
Georg-Johann Lay a...@jlay.de writes:
This patch adds GCC Runtime Library Exception to files that go into
libgcc because libgcc2.c includes tm.h and libgcc_tm.h.
Most of these files contain much code, some used by libgcc, some
not. Some
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ struct GTY((chain_next (RTX_NEXT (%h)
/* The INSN_UID of an RTX_INSN-class code. */
int insn_uid;
+/* The SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS of a SYMBOL_REF. */
+unsigned int symbol_ref_flags;
+
In [3/7] you used
[I'd like to add Oleg to CC list.]
Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Just saw the Jeff's approval for the RTL part. Sorry for the crossed answers
remains the target maintainers. Joern, Kaz ?
SH specific part looks OK to me. Oleg, could you comment on
the patch?
Regards,
Hi,
almost obvious, I would say. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2014-05-12 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* cvt.c (cp_convert_to_pointer): Don't call error_at if
complain tf_error is false.
* decl.c (make_unbound_class_template):
Michael Matz m...@suse.de writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
unnecessary though,
OK to install?
Ick. I don’t favor skip. The change feels like a premature
optimization that doesn’t net any code
Michael Matz m...@suse.de writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ struct GTY((chain_next (RTX_NEXT (%h)
/* The INSN_UID of an RTX_INSN-class code. */
int insn_uid;
+/* The SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS of a SYMBOL_REF. */
+unsigned int
Hi,
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Also I'm idly wondering if the explicit sizing of
the fields via a bit-field as originally would be better here or just
confusing. I guess unsigned and enums are 32bit for all hosts we care
about, but if we ever have one where it's
On 12 May 2014 10:06, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Just saw the Jeff's approval for the RTL part. Sorry for the crossed answers
remains the target maintainers. Joern, Kaz ?
Many thanks.
Christian
On 05/12/2014 10:44 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
Hello,
I'd still wish to
Am 04/18/2014 11:52 AM, schrieb Senthil Kumar Selvaraj:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
This patch modifies AVR target's ASM spec to pass -mlink-relax to the
assembler if -mrelax is passed to the compiler driver. This was
On 04/28/2014 10:08 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ping the following patches
[Hookize mode-switching]
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01003.html
[Add new hooks to support toggle and SH4A fpchg instruction]
On 12 May 2014 13:16, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Just for my curiosity, which other targets have multi-way toggling
support ?
The epiphany has, sort of: you read a control register, AND and/or OR
some mask(s) to the value,
and write it back.
If we knew the previous mode, we
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/19/14 08:06, Marcos Díaz wrote:
Well, finally I have the assignment, could you please review this patch?
Thanks. I'll take a look once we open up stage1 development again (should
be soon as 4.9 is getting close to being
On 12 May 2014 13:51, Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
On 12 May 2014 13:16, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
Just for my curiosity, which other targets have multi-way toggling
support ?
The epiphany has, sort of: you read a control register, AND and/or OR
some
Hi,
This patch add support for xsavec, xsaves ISA extensions, introduced in
[1], and clflushopt introduced in [2].
[1]http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/architectures-software-developer-manuals.html
[2]http://software.intel.com/en-us/file/319433-018pdf
Bootstraps, passes
On 26-04-14 14:51, Tom de Vries wrote:
Eric,
Honza,
This patch adds analysis in pass_final to track which hard registers are set or
clobbered by the function body, and stores that information in a
struct cgraph_node, to be used in the fuse-caller-save optmization.
This is the updated version
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch add support for xsavec, xsaves ISA extensions, introduced in
[1], and clflushopt introduced in [2].
[1]http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/architectures-software-developer-manuals.html
Yes, those seem obvious.
Jason
On May 12, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Yeah, but the reason I'm removing the desc/tag pair isn't so much to get
rid of that (the compiler should do it for us) but because marking it
anything other than skip gives the impression that we want to allow
Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:18:47PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
No, that's wrong: avoid hardcoding target lists if at all possible.
Besides, it's wrong since it doesn't cover the Solaris (and other
non-gld linker) case. Use the init_priority
Hi Wei,
please teach your mailer not to break/mangle long lines. Thanks.
Here is a patch for the test. It contains two changes:
1. For emutls, there will be an explicit call generated at expand
pass, and no stack adjustment is needed. So add /* {
dg-require-effective-target tls_native } */
Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com writes:
Patch with fixes attached.
Currently if-structure is as following:
+ if (count == 3)
...
+ else
+ {
+ /* If length is not equal to 3 then only power of 2 is supported.
*/
+ gcc_assert (exact_log2 (count) !=
Hi,
I see a couple of errors when building for arm-linux-gnueabi (host is
x86_64 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, host compiler is gcc version 4.6.3
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)):
1) In file included from
On 05/10/14 13:58, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The rtx u2 field currently uses a desc/tag pair for GTY. This seems
unnecessary though, since the field is specifically supposed to be
32 bits wide on 64-bit hosts and so cannot hold a pointer.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
On 05/12/2014 03:20 PM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
This is the first libsanitizer merge in 4.10
Thanks, Kostya.
I see that ASAN_DYNAMIC is not fully supported in libsanitizer
Makefiles, I'll work on this once your patch goes in. I also have
pending patch for
On 05/10/14 14:00, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The print-rtl.c code for '0' fields has a complicated sequence of
ifndef GENERATOR_FILEs. None of the '0' data makes sense for generators
though, so it seems simpler to wrap the whole case instead.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr50459.c -std=gnu++1y (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr50459.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors)
The errors are
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr50459.c:8:1: error: constructor
priorities
On 05/10/14 14:08, Richard Sandiford wrote:
...and reduce the size of REGs by one field. This is still OK for REG-MEM
conversion since MEMs only have 2 fields.
In some ways it would have been nicer to move REGNO to the header,
since we wouldn't then need to fetch the second word of the rtx
On 05/12/14 05:00, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Michael Matz m...@suse.de writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ struct GTY((chain_next (RTX_NEXT (%h)
/* The INSN_UID of an RTX_INSN-class code. */
int insn_uid;
+/* The SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS of
On 05/10/14 14:12, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This is a bit more complicated than REG because INSN_UID is an i field
and so is a parameter to the respective gen_rtx_FOOs. However, in all
but one case these uids were dummy values; the one exception can simply
set the INSN_UID after the call
On 05/10/14 14:16, Richard Sandiford wrote:
SCRATCH has a single 0 field because reload used to turn it directly
into a REG. It no longer does (or could do) that since REG has three
fields rather than one. This patch therefore updates the comment and
removes the field.
Tested on
On 05/10/14 14:22, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This is the other case (apart from INSN_UID) in which the field being
moved is an i. I kept the gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION interface the same
by writing it in C code. As with INSN_UID, removing an i is safe
because genrecog and the equality routines don't
Hi,
I have the following comment.
boehm-gc/ChangeLog:
2014-05-11 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
Fix current cygwin-64 build problems.
* include/gc_config_macros.h (GC_PTHREADS): Use __CYGWIN__ instead
of __CYGWIN32__ here.
* win32_threads.c (GC_push_all_stacks): Push all X86_64
2014-05-12 14:17 GMT+04:00 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
senthil_kumar.selva...@atmel.com:
This trivial patch fixes PR60991 by correcting the constant used to
restore Y in one of the assembler template variants used in avr_out_store_psi.
I've also added a testcase (modified from the original poster's
Joseph,
I don't think the whole test should be skipped for that issue; I think the
part requiring this feature should be split out into a separate testcase,
so that as much as possible is still tested on Darwin.
Is the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr50459.c
On 05/12/14 02:02, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Hi,
According to Steven and Jeff's comments, the patch cleans up most
shrink-wrapping codes from function.c to new added shrink-wrap.c.
Changes include:
(1) Move functions requires_stack_frame_p, next_block_for_reg,
move_insn_for_shrink_wrap,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 06:11:16PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Joseph,
I don't think the whole test should be skipped for that issue; I think the
part requiring this feature should be split out into a separate testcase,
so that as much as possible is still tested on Darwin.
Is
Am 08.05.2014 23:36, schrieb Joseph S. Myers:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering
of -Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted
with 4.7. No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and 4.8
Thanks! May I ask you to contribute the patch upstream?
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Maxim Ostapenko
m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
I see a couple of errors when building for arm-linux-gnueabi (host is x86_64
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com wrote:
On 05/12/2014 03:20 PM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
This is the first libsanitizer merge in 4.10
Thanks, Kostya.
I see that ASAN_DYNAMIC is not fully supported in libsanitizer Makefiles,
Generally, I prefer to
On 05/12/14 01:15, Mike Stump wrote:
2014-05-07 Mike Stumpmikest...@comcast.net
* genattrtab.c (struct insn_def): Add filename.
(convert_set_attr_alternative): Improve error message.
(check_defs): Ensure read_md_filename is set appropriately.
(gen_insn): Save
On 05/11/14 18:40, David Wohlferd wrote:
I don't have permissions to commit this patch, but I do have a release
on file with the FSF.
Problem description:
The existing docs make reference to a macro which is described below.
However, this is the final sentence in the section; there is no
below.
On Apr 28, 2014, at 3:35 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapa...@gmail.com wrote:
+ a = private;/* { dg-warning hides instance variable { xfail
*-*-* } } */
+ a = protected; /* { dg-warning hides instance variable { xfail
*-*-* } } */
+ a = public; /* { dg-warning hides instance
On 05/11/14 04:03, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
wrote:
Hello,
in my recent phiopt patch enhancing value_replacement to optimize
x!=0?x+y:y, I forgot to check that there is no other PHI (not sure
On 05/10/14 14:24, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Very much like the code to move ORIGINAL_REGNO, but with a few more
knock-on changes. I handled the printing by dumping the flags
immediately before the SYMBOL_REF_DATA.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/
*
On 05/12/2014 08:16 PM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Thanks! May I ask you to contribute the patch upstream?
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
Note that we wouldn't be able to repro in upstream because
* ARM isn't supported
* LLVM won't build with gcc 4.6 anyway
Currently, on AArch64, when a caller-save register is saved/restored,
GCC is accessing the maximum size of the hard register.
So an SImode integer (4 bytes) value is being stored as DImode (8 bytes)
because the int registers are 8 bytes wide, and an SFmode float (4 bytes)
and DFmode double (8
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/10/14 14:16, Richard Sandiford wrote:
SCRATCH has a single 0 field because reload used to turn it directly
into a REG. It no longer does (or could do) that since REG has three
fields rather than one. This patch therefore updates the comment and
removes
Hi!
On Fri, 9 May 2014 18:07:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:03:35AM -0500, James Norris wrote:
Removed three occurrences of a shadow variable.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2014-05-09 James Norris
* ARM isn't supported
I meant ARM-Linux.
-Y
On 05/12/2014 08:18 PM, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Didn'thttp://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revisionrevision=208530 help?
Ah true, I missed the fact that you define PIC in libsanitizer/configure.
-Y
On 05/09/14 01:14, John Marino wrote:
On 5/9/2014 07:26, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/03/14 01:11, John Marino wrote:
In config.gcc:
+no | gnat | single)
+ # Let these non-posix thread selections fall through if requested
Support for gnat as a thread model was removed in 2011. So I think
On 05/12/14 10:37, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The rtl.def SCRATCH entry predates the repository (1991) and I couldn't
see anything in the initial versions of reload.c or reload1.c that set
the code to a REG. local-alloc.c had:
if (qty_scratch_rtx[q])
{
if (GET_CODE
On 5/12/2014 18:59, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/09/14 01:14, John Marino wrote:
1) Patch updated online as requested
2) At this exact point in time, we probably can share the files
3) I might debate that we should share the files - that would imply
reviewing the existing counterpart files for
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* cgraphunit.c (thunk_adjust): Strengthen local stmt from gimple
to gimple_assign.
* gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c
(insert_trap_and_remove_trailing_statements): Strengthen local
new_stmt from gimple to
On 05/12/14 11:10, John Marino wrote:
On 5/12/2014 18:59, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/09/14 01:14, John Marino wrote:
1) Patch updated online as requested
2) At this exact point in time, we probably can share the files
3) I might debate that we should share the files - that would imply
reviewing
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_atomic_store): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_atomic_store): New typedef.
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_gimple_omp_atomic_store): Require
a gimple_omp_atomic_store rather than a plain gimple.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_call): Require a gimple_call rather
than a plain gimple.
(verify_gimple_stmt): Add checked cast to gimple_call within
GIMPLE_CALL case of switch statement.
OK when prerequisites have gone
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_task): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_task): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_task): New.
(gimple_build_omp_task): Return a gimple_omp_task
rather than a
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_single): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_single): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_single): New.
(gimple_build_omp_single): Return a gimple_omp_single rather than
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_teams): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_teams): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_teams): New.
(gimple_build_omp_teams): Return a gimple_omp_teams rather than a
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_critical): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_critical): New typedef.
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_gimple_omp_critical): Require a
gimple_omp_critical rather than a plain gimple.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_atomic_load): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_atomic_load): New typedef.
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_gimple_omp_atomic_load): Require a
gimple_omp_atomic_load rather than a plain gimple.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_phi_arg_set_location): Require a gimple_phi
rather than a plain gimple.
OK once prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* omp-low.c (finalize_task_copyfn): Strengthen local bind from
plain gimple to gimple_bind.
(lower_rec_input_clauses): Strengthen local g from
plain gimple to gimple_assign.
(lower_lastprivate_clauses): Likewise
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_phi_set_result): Require a gimple_phi rather
than a plain gimple.
(gimple_phi_set_arg): Likewise.
* tree-outof-ssa.c (remove_gimple_phi_args): Likewise; add a checked
cast to gimple_phi.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_label_set_label): Require a gimple_label.
OK once prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
\
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_catch_types): Require a const_gimple_catch
rather than a const_gimple.
---
OK once prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_goto_set_dest): Require a gimple_goto.
* tree-cfg.c (factor_computed_gotos): Add checked cast to gimple_goto.
(cleanup_dead_labels): Likewise.
OK once prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_call_use_set): Require a gimple_call.
(gimple_call_clobber_set): Likewise.
OK once prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_try_set_catch_is_cleanup): Require a gimple_try.
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Convert local try_ from a gimple
to a gimple_try.
OK after prerequisites have gone in.
jeff
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* tree-parloops.c (reduction_info::keep_res): Strengthen field
from plain gimple to gimple_phi.
(transform_to_exit_first_loop): Strengthen locals phi, nphi
to gimple_phi. Eliminate early decl of gimple_stmt_iterator
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_sections): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_sections): New typedef.
* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_gimple_omp_sections): Require a
gimple_omp_sections rather than a plain gimple.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_call_return_slot_opt_p): Require a gimple_call
rather than a plain gimple.
* gimple-walk.c (walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops): Convert usage of
is_gimple_call to dyn_cast_gimple_call, introducing a new
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_target): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_target): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_target): New.
(gimple_build_omp_target): Return a gimple_omp_target
Here is a patch for the test. It contains two changes:
1. For emutls, there will be an explicit call generated at expand
pass, and no stack adjustment is needed. So add /* {
dg-require-effective-target tls_native } */ in the test.
2. Replace cfi_def_cfa_offset with insn sequence check.
Is
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_for): New.
(const_gimple_omp_for): New.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_for): New.
(gimple_statement_base::dyn_cast_gimple_omp_for): New.
(gimple_build_omp_for):
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_continue): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_continue): New typedef.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::as_a_gimple_omp_continue): New.
(gimple_build_omp_continue): Return a gimple_omp_continue
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple_omp_parallel): New typedef.
(const_gimple_omp_parallel): New typedef.
* cgraphbuild.c (build_cgraph_edges): Convert check of code
against GIMPLE_OMP_PARALLEL to a dyn_cast_gimple_omp_parallel and
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_phi_arg_def_ptr): Require a gimple_phi rather
than a plain gimple.
(gimple_phi_arg_has_location): Likewise.
* gimple-streamer-in.c (input_phi): Return a gimple_phi rather
than a plain gimple.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_call_return_slot_opt_p): Require a gimple_call
rather than a plain gimple.
* gimple-walk.c (walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops): Convert usage of
is_gimple_call to dyn_cast_gimple_call, introducing a new
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.h (gimple_eh_filter_set_types): Require a gimple_eh_filter.
(gimple_eh_filter_set_failure): Likewise.
* gimple.c (gimple_copy): Add checked casts to gimple_eh_filter
within GIMPLE_EH_FILTER case.
---
OK once
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.c (gimple_copy): Add checked casts to gimple_try.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::dyn_cast_gimple_try): New.
(gimple_try_set_kind): Require a gimple_try.
(gimple_try_set_eval): Likewise.
On 04/21/14 10:57, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* gimple.c (gimple_copy): Add checked casts to gimple_try.
* gimple.h (gimple_statement_base::dyn_cast_gimple_try): New.
(gimple_try_set_kind): Require a gimple_try.
(gimple_try_set_eval): Likewise.
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
