On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Tested with
> GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE=1 make -k check-gcc \
> RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix/-mavx2 dg-torture.exp=vshuf*.c'
> on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk if it passes bootstrap?
>
> As for the previous testcase with distilled pr
On 09/26/2014 12:55 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all!
Here's a patch which instruments byte-aligned BIT_FIELD_REFs. During
GCC asan-bootstrap and Linux kernel build I didn't find any cases
where BIT_FIELD_REF is not 8 bits aligned. But I do not have
sufficient confidence to replace current re
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix
PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo
-march=amdfam10) on x8
This patch to libgo, based on one from Bryan Hundven, fixes libgo's use
of CPU_COUNT to check whether CPU_COUNT is defined, rather than checking
the glibc version. This works with other libraries, like uclibc. This
is issue 38 in the gofrontend issue tracker. Bootstrapped and ran Go
testsuite on
Built and tested clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Ed
2014-10-03 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
* include/std/type_traits: Add is_final<> type trait for C++14.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_tr1.h: Add
* testsuite/20_util/is_final/requirements/
explicit_insta
Hi,
this patch adds very basic logic for tracking dynamic wrt static types.
Basically it intoruced field DYNAMIC that specify if context represent static
storage or type found by get_dynamic_type. Static storage is stronger in a way
that we know its size (I do not track at all for dynamic types) a
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
If vec.h is included before ggc.h it forward declares ggc_realloc with
defaulted arguments. This means ggc.h can not be included later because
it would lead to a second declaration of ggc_realloc with defaulted
arguments. In generator programs vec.h can not include gg
On 10/02/14 12:56, Richard Biener wrote:
Yes, but I don't see why we need the cleanup step. The decls are real after all.
You won't hear me complain.
I was just worried people were going to start complaining about larger
.debug_info sections, since I see that the current code, as it stands i
[Sorry for the long delay]
> The LEON3/4 soft-core CPU has support for both SPARCv7 and SPARCv8 that
> is configurable at design time. The majority of the LEON3 ASICs are v8
> compatible, however when designing an as small LEON3 as possible, v7
> without FPU is frequently used.
>
> The current GC
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 10:08 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 02:51 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/01/2014 11:28 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/09/14 10:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/09/14 21:46 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: include/bits/stl_function.h
=
On 2014-10-02 7:31 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The pa
2014-10-02 22:30 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/02/14 08:30, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds a check for call destination register for a call return
>> value optimization based on REG_RETURNED note. This solves some ICE issues
>> for MPX codes.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on l
On October 2, 2014 8:21:51 PM CEST, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>On 10/02/14 08:46, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 10/01/2014 05:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> + for (tree t = level->names; t; t = TREE_CHAIN(t))
>>> +if (TREE_CODE (t) != TYPE_DECL
>>> +&& TREE_CODE (t) != PARM_DECL
>>> +&& !D
Hello,
On 29 September 2014 11:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 26/09/14 23:42 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>> Generated by make new-abi-baseline on aarch64-suse-linux.
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>> * config/abi/post/aarch64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: New
>> file.
>
>
> OK, thanks.
On 10/02/14 08:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/30/2014 02:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ if (parm_die
+ /* Make sure the function to which this parameter belongs to is
+ not an abstract instance. If it is, we can't reuse anything.
+ We must create a new DW_TAG_formal_parameter with
Hi,
Here's a revised version of the patch that addresses Segher's comments.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
[gcc]
2014-10-02 Bill Schmidt
* altivec.md (altivec_lvsl): New define_expand.
(altivec_lvsl_direct): Rename defi
> > The test would only pass for msp430x (and fail for msp430, which is
> > the same target back-end). Do I need to redo the big patch, or would
> > a separate one suffice?
>
> Separate is fine.
Turns out it's mangled like this:
__int20 foo (__int20 a, unsigned __int20 b);
_Z3foou5int20u6uint
On 10/02/2014 02:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Segher Boessenkool writes:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
branch cut f
On 10/01/14 11:03, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Probably need to file a bug to track the copyrename2 problem.
Yea, that would definitely be appreciated.
Jeff
On 10/01/14 10:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch removes some asserts my jump threading patch r215739 added.
An upstream pass (copyrename2) is introducing some bogus profile
counts, so we can't assert that counts are 0 when there is no profile
data for the function.
Tested on testcase attache
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> And now the expand_vec_perm_palignr improvement, tested
>> with GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE=1 make check-gcc \
>> RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix/-mavx2 dg-torture.exp=vshuf*.c'
>> E.g.
>> typedef unsigned long long V __attribute__ ((vector_size
On 10/01/14 14:04, Teresa Johnson wrote:
The block frequencies are very small in this case leading to rounding
errors when computing the edge frequency. The rounding error was then
propagated into the recomputed probabilities, leading to insanities in
the outgoing edge probabilities on the jump t
On 10/02/14 04:29, David Sherwood wrote:
Hi,
At the request of Andreas Schwab I have fixed the hard_regno bitfield
in the allocno structure as signed integers need to be explicitly marked as
signed in bitfields.
Cheers,
Dave.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-02 David Sherwood
* ira-int.h:
On 10/02/14 04:40, Eric Botcazou wrote:
[This is an old discussion about useless integral conversions introduced
behind the back of the front-end by the routines in convert.c]
I don't like re-introducing that inconsistency.
OK.
Maybe instead make convert.c do if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED) unsigned_ty
On 10/02/14 08:30, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a check for call destination register for a call return value
optimization based on REG_RETURNED note. This solves some ICE issues for MPX
codes.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-02 I
On 10/02/14 08:46, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/01/2014 05:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ for (tree t = level->names; t; t = TREE_CHAIN(t))
+if (TREE_CODE (t) != TYPE_DECL
+&& TREE_CODE (t) != PARM_DECL
+&& !DECL_IS_BUILTIN (t))
+ debug_hooks->early_global_decl (t);
What does t
OK. Sorry for the delay, please feel free to ping patches as often as
once a week.
Jason
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
> >> branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
> >
> > C
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 08:03 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/19/2014 08:18 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- /*non_constant_p=*/&dummy);
+ &dummy);
Why remove the comment?
Oh well, the rationale was that normally we use that sort of comment
only to explain integer litera
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:58:37AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> In fact, I think I'll just go ahead and pre-approve the other patches of
> this nature.
Thanks. I have a bunch of similar patches that just need proper CL
entries, but they're of the same nature: missing declarations,
defaulting to int,
On 10/01/14 17:27, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 16:34 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
This was inspired by a discussion with Felix who was making changes in
this area.
Basically this promotes the "init_insns" field within struct equivalence
from an rtx to an rtx_insn_list.
The only thing
On 08/19/2014 08:18 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- /*non_constant_p=*/&dummy);
+ &dummy);
Why remove the comment?
The rest of the patch is OK.
Jason
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 07:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/02/2014 12:44 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ s->noexcept_operand = scope_chain ? cp_noexcept_operand : 0;
s->x_stmt_tree.stmts_are_full_exprs_p = true;
scope_chain = s;
@@ -6182,6 +6183,7 @@ pop_from_top_level_1 (void)
current_fun
On 10/01/14 22:26, Andi Kleen wrote:
From: Andi Kleen
gcc/testsuite/:
2014-09-30 Andi Kleen
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/errors.c: New test.
OK.
Jeff
On 10/01/14 22:26, Andi Kleen wrote:
From: Andi Kleen
gcc/testsuite/:
2014-09-30 Andi Kleen
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/misc.c (main): Handle
new cilk errors.
OK.
Jeff
On 10/01/14 22:26, Andi Kleen wrote:
From: Andi Kleen
Output the correct location for an existing cilk error message.
gcc/c-family/:
2014-09-28 Andi Kleen
* cilk.c (recognize_spawn): Use expression location
for error message.'
OK.
Jeff
> Ah, good point. In which case I don't see what this code is trying to
> accomplish relative to falling through to the "prefer the unsigned one"
> code below. Shall we just remove it?
I don't know for sure. There was __int128 code there, I replaced it
with the "same" code, so as to avoid an
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:46:19PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
> >> branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
> >
> > C
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> In the go tool, when converting the pkgpath argument to use for a symbol
> name, everything except alphanumeric characters is converted to an
> underscore character. This is PR 61880. This patch from Alexander
> Shopov changes the Go fro
On 10/02/14 07:39, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/vect/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
O
On 10/02/14 07:49, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 02 Oct 15:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:29:15PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Seems some new warnings appeared lately and now I see a bootstrap failure for
mpx branch due to missing IPA_REF_CHKP case in switch statement in
pr
In the go tool, when converting the pkgpath argument to use for a symbol
name, everything except alphanumeric characters is converted to an
underscore character. This is PR 61880. This patch from Alexander
Shopov changes the Go frontend to match, so that the symbol names
generated by the cgo tool
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
>> branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
>
> Confirmed. The following patch works for me, and Andrew has tested it
> as well
On 10/02/2014 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
The C++ standard says that extended integer types participate in the
usual arithmetic conversions. If I add a 32-bit int and an __int48, the
usual arithmetic conversions should convert the int to __int48.
Except the code you're referring to isn't part
On 10/02/14 10:48, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/noncompile/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a defau
On 10/02/14 11:01, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/tree-prof/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a defaul
On 02/10/14 09:49, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/15/14 08:33, Jiong Wang wrote:
Jeff,
thanks, I partially understand your meaning here.
take the function "ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs" in ira-lives.c
for example,
when generatin
On 10/02/2014 12:44 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ s->noexcept_operand = scope_chain ? cp_noexcept_operand : 0;
s->x_stmt_tree.stmts_are_full_exprs_p = true;
scope_chain = s;
@@ -6182,6 +6183,7 @@ pop_from_top_level_1 (void)
current_function_decl = s->function_decl;
cp_unevaluated_o
On Thursday 02 October 2014 11:42:35 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The library macros are safe and can't cause any issues, so I'm happy for
> them to go on the branch.
>
> I can think of at least two that aren't implemented on the branch:
> and the std::is_final trait (although I'd be OK with the
> tr
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:38:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Ok for trunk?
>
> 2014-09-24 Jakub Jelinek
>
> * ubsan.h (ubsan_get_source_location): New prototype.
> * ubsan.c (ubsan_source_location_type): New variable.
> Function renamed to ...
> (ubsan_get_source_lo
On 09/17/2014 09:08 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 08:38 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is the third version of the patch. A list of changes since last
>> version:
>> * move config to contrib so that it's _not_ enabled by default (current
>> score is 2/1 in favor of no Vim co
I've merged the last ~3 weeks of changes of svn trunk to the git branch
dmalcolm/jit, pushing it as
dbfbacdbbf727e8ab3a8cff2d5650d8000de0449.
Specifically, this is from trunk r215803 aka
68874c5d021dd6b8b740ffd23960e46e333270b5 (2014-10-02) bringing in all
changes since r215090 aka65d8ffc23985
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:47:39AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> > Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
> > branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
>
> Confirmed. The following patch works
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/tree-prof/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
Ok?
2014-10-02 Marek Polacek
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/noncompile/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
Ok?
2014-10-02 Marek Polacek
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
> branch cut from mainline from yesterday.
Confirmed. The following patch works for me, and Andrew has tested it
as well. The comment it removes isn't valid
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 04:26 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/02/2014 08:11 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+/* Nonzero if we are parsing the operand of a noexcept operator. */
+
+extern int cp_noexcept_operand;
Rather than add a global variable, let's look it up in scope_chain
directly, like current_nam
> The C++ standard says that extended integer types participate in the
> usual arithmetic conversions. If I add a 32-bit int and an __int48, the
> usual arithmetic conversions should convert the int to __int48.
Except the code you're referring to isn't part of that conversion. It
only handles
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 23:27 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
[...]
> Shouldn't the jit.pdf, jit.install-html etc. Make-lang.in hooks actually
> build / install the documentation for this JIT?
[...]
I've committed the following to the branch dmalcolm/jit:
This patch implements the documentation targ
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Probably need to file a bug to track the copyrename2 problem.
I have filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63443 to track this.
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> This patch removes some
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:02 -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
>> Will take a look. In case I can't reproduce it with the aarch64
>> cross-compiler or x86_64, can you give me the preprocessed source? And
>> also the instructions for how to configur
On 10/02/2014 11:53 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/30/2014 02:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ if (parm_die
+ /* Make sure the function to which this parameter belongs to is
+ not an abstract instance. If it is, we can't reuse anything.
+ We must create a new DW_TAG_formal_parameter
On 09/30/2014 02:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ if (parm_die
+ /* Make sure the function to which this parameter belongs to is
+not an abstract instance. If it is, we can't reuse anything.
+We must create a new DW_TAG_formal_parameter with a
+corresponding DW_AT_abs
On 17/09/14 16:55 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Our only includes , not as required by
26.8 [c.math] paragraph 1.
Is that intentional?
Probably not (I don't know), but if you change it, please include
instead of the nonsensical (and equivalent) . I
On 10/01/2014 05:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ for (tree t = level->names; t; t = TREE_CHAIN(t))
+if (TREE_CODE (t) != TYPE_DECL
+ && TREE_CODE (t) != PARM_DECL
+ && !DECL_IS_BUILTIN (t))
+ debug_hooks->early_global_decl (t);
What does this do for templates? I think we d
On 10/01/2014 03:08 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> func TestMakeFunc(t *testing.T) {
>> switch runtime.GOARCH {
>> case "amd64", "386":
>> default:
>> t.Skip("MakeFunc not implemented for " + runtime.GOARCH)
>> }
>
> Wait, what sources are you looki
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 22:02 -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Will take a look. In case I can't reproduce it with the aarch64
> cross-compiler or x86_64, can you give me the preprocessed source? And
> also the instructions for how to configure for MIPS.
>
> Teresa
Never mind, I messed up the patch
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:04 -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-10-01 Teresa Johnson
>>>
>>> * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (freqs_to_counts_path): Scale frequencies
>>>
The library macros are safe and can't cause any issues, so I'm happy for them
to go on the branch.
I can think of at least two that aren't implemented on the branch:
and the std::is_final trait (although I'd be OK with the
trait going on the branch too).
- Original Message -
From: "
On 10/02/2014 10:58 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
We've had a request from someone that we include SD-6 feature testing
for gcc-4.9.
It seems rather heavy for a backport but it might make maintainers of
large C++ libraries happy ;-) and it might make sense as people migrate
from 4.9 to 5.0 to see w
Hello,
With this patch lto-wrapper performs invocation of mkoffload tool for each
offload target. This tool should be provided by the corresponding offload
compiler. It will compile IR from .gnu.offload_lto_* sections into offload
target code and embed the resultant code (offload image) into the
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Andi Kleen wrote:
> +/* Check that no array notation or spawn statement is in EXPR.
> + If not true gemerate an error at LOC for WHAT. */
> +
> +bool
> +check_no_cilk (tree expr, const char *what, location_t loc)
> +{
> + if (!flag_cilkplus)
> +return false;
> + if (co
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:32:31 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
> > The upcoming patch series constitutes our current (still
> > in-progress) implementation of run-time support for OpenACC 2.0 in
> > libgomp. We've tried to build on top
On 10/02/2014 10:22 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Extended integer types larger than long long also participate in
enumeral promotion if needed, but I think your changes to
c_common_type_for_size handle that.
...and it seems we currently don't support enums with underlying type
larger than long lon
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sizeof (long) == 4 on windows, so we should use long long as param type.
> Patch below does it.
The same is true for x32. Can you add a testcase to show it
fails on x32 without the fix?
> Ok for trunk?
>
> 2014-10-02 Ilya Tocar
>
>
Hi,
This patch adds a check for call destination register for a call return value
optimization based on REG_RETURNED note. This solves some ICE issues for MPX
codes.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-02 Ilya Enkovich
* lra-constraints.
Hi,
sizeof (long) == 4 on windows, so we should use long long as param type.
Patch below does it.
Ok for trunk?
2014-10-02 Ilya Tocar
* config/i386/adxintrin.h (_subborrow_u64): Use long long for param
type.
(_addcarry_u64): Ditto.
(_addcarryx_u64): Ditto.
---
On 01 Oct 14:57, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 2014-09-25 5:46 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >2014-09-25 1:51 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> >>2014-09-24 23:09 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> >>>On 09/24/14 07:13, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> I tried to generate PARALLEL with all regs set by call. Here is a
On 10/02/2014 08:11 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+/* Nonzero if we are parsing the operand of a noexcept operator. */
+
+extern int cp_noexcept_operand;
Rather than add a global variable, let's look it up in scope_chain
directly, like current_namespace and such.
Jason
On 02/10/14 10:09 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Thank you! I tried to do this and couldn't fo
On 10/01/2014 11:52 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
It seems like the int128 code here was broken and this is continuing
that brokenness. Extended integer types have integer conversion rank
corresponding to their bitsize, so int128 should have higher rank than
long long, but here it was being checked afte
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Thank you! I tried to do this and couldn't for permissions. I'm
probably not doing it right.
On 24 Sep 12:29, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-09-24 0:58 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> > On 06/05/14 08:46, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>
> >> 2014-06-05 Ilya Enkovich
> >>
> >> * calls.c: Include tree-chkp.h, rtl-chkp.h, bitmap.h.
> >> (arg_data): Add fields special_slot, pointer_arg and
>
On 02 Oct 11:49, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>
> > 2014-10-01 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * config/i386/i386.md (UNSPEC_SIZEOF): New.
> > (move_size_reloc_): New.
> > * config/i386/predicates.md (symbol_operand): New.
> >
On 02 Oct 15:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:29:15PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Seems some new warnings appeared lately and now I see a bootstrap failure
> > for mpx branch due to missing IPA_REF_CHKP case in switch statement in
> > process_references funct
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/vect/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
Ok?
2014-10-02 Marek Polacek
*
Ping.
On 15 Aug 16:26, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On 29 Jul 18:45, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed here in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00189.html
> > Gcc should complain about pragma omp declare target without
> > corresponding pragma omp end declare target. This patch
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:29:15PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems some new warnings appeared lately and now I see a bootstrap failure for
> mpx branch due to missing IPA_REF_CHKP case in switch statement in
> process_references function. This function handles varpool_nodes which
>
Hi,
Seems some new warnings appeared lately and now I see a bootstrap failure for
mpx branch due to missing IPA_REF_CHKP case in switch statement in
process_references function. This function handles varpool_nodes which cannot
have references of this kind. This patch fixes a warning.
Thanks,
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/tm/ directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
Ok?
2014-10-02 Marek Polacek
* g
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/torture directory.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch ==
results with this patch and gnu11 as a default.
Ok?
2014-10-02 Marek Polacek
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:34:20PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Wouldn't it be worthwhile to avoid such changes for dozen or two randomly
> selected testcases from these and instead add -std=gnu89 for them?
> Just making sure we don't get rid of all the tests for non-prototyped call
> and/or defau
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 05:22 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/01/2014 12:31 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
in this issue Daniel argued that the value of a noexcept expression
should not depend on constructor elision.
I'm open to that, but I don't think it's at all clear in the standard.
Ok. Personally, I
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:47:51PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> So, how does this look now?
Looks much better.
There are some nits I'd change, like:
1) no need not to handle bitfields
2) IMHO it should handle PARM_DECL and RESULT_DECL alongside of VAR_DECL
3) decl_p IMHO should use just DECL_P
4
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ directory.
> It is quite large, but trivial - mostly only missing declarations
> and defaulting to int. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html
> for more i
On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
> >
> > The patch was successfully bootstrappe
This patch is a cleanup of tests in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ directory.
It is quite large, but trivial - mostly only missing declarations
and defaulting to int. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02656.html
for more info.
Tested on x86_64-linux: vanilla results == results with this patch
[This is an old discussion about useless integral conversions introduced
behind the back of the front-end by the routines in convert.c]
> I don't like re-introducing that inconsistency.
OK.
> Maybe instead make convert.c do if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED) unsigned_type_for ()
> instead? I notice that all
Hi,
At the request of Andreas Schwab I have fixed the hard_regno bitfield
in the allocno structure as signed integers need to be explicitly marked as
signed in bitfields.
Cheers,
Dave.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-02 David Sherwood
* ira-int.h: (ira_allocno) Make hard_regno explicitly sig
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/ch
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
