On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:19:08PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
First part of this patch is about removing the useless check that
we talked about earlier today.
The rest is about not emitting UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE checks (those often
come with multiple statements to compute a pointer difference)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
No extra includes required?
utility is already included in wide-int.h and rtl.h, should probably move
those.
Bah, we hit a problem. std::swap has been moved from algorithm
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:51:41AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok. Can you please replace remaining HOST_WIDE_INT
vestiges in there with [u]int64_t please?
This patch
I just don't like all the as_a/is_a stuff enforced everywhere,
it means more typing, more temporaries, more indentation.
So, as I view it, instead of the checks being done cheaply (yes, I think
the gimple checking as we have right now is very cheap) under the
hood by the accessors
On 11/11/14 08:40, Terry Guo wrote:
Hi there,
Attached patch intends to fix below trunk failure caused by recent thumb-1
UAL patch:
/tmp/cc9EfnXy.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc9EfnXy.s:69: Error: MOV Rd, Rs with two low registers is not
permitted on this architecture -- `mov r6,r7'
Now for
Hi there,
Attached patch intends to fix below trunk failure caused by recent thumb-1
UAL patch:
/tmp/cc9EfnXy.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc9EfnXy.s:69: Error: MOV Rd, Rs with two low registers is not
permitted on this architecture -- `mov r6,r7'
Now for pre-v6 Thumb-1, the 'movs' will be used
Hello,
I have written a testsuite for AArch32 Neon intrinsics, available at
https://gitorious.org/arm-neon-tests
I am in the process of converting in into DejaGnu form for integration into
GCC.
My most recent submission was
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok. Can you please replace remaining HOST_WIDE_INT
vestiges in there with [u]int64_t please?
This
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:45:38AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok. Can you please replace remaining
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds support for operator-lists to be used in expression.
I reuse operator-list as the iterator. This is not really valid since
user-defined operator-lists cannot be iterator in 'for', but
libtool.m4 has a globbing pattern that assumes Mac OS version numbers 10.x are
one digit for x. That’s unfortunate, especially now that Mac OS 10.10 was
released :)
libtool has released a new version to fix this bug. The attached patch,
bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin14 (Mac
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:58:45AM +0100, FX wrote:
libtool.m4 has a globbing pattern that assumes Mac OS version numbers 10.x
are one digit for x. That’s unfortunate, especially now that Mac OS 10.10 was
released :)
libtool has released a new version to fix this bug. The attached patch,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
My knowledge of C++ is limited, but I think this additional patch to
wide-int.h is the proper fix to the issue reported by Jack, no?
I’m bootstrapping it right now, it already passed stage 2.
Boostrapped succeeded on
Your patch contains lots of other changes, not just the libtool.m4
change. Please filter those out.
Sorry about that. The patch attached should be clean, and the ChangeLog entries
formatted as they should.
OK to commit? This touches so many area it probably needs a build maintainer or
Ok.
Committed as rev. 217342.
Thanks for the review!
FX
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:51:41AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok. Can you please replace remaining HOST_WIDE_INT
vestiges in there with
-Original Message-
From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry@arm.com]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 6:01 PM
To: 'Christian Bruel'
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [2/2][PATCH,ARM]Generate UAL assembly code for Thumb-1
target
-Original Message-
From: Christian
Hello Marc, Uroš,
On 10 Nov 21:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
and == for integer vectors of size 128. I was surprised not to find
_mm_cmplt_epi64 anywhere. Note that I can do the same for size 256, but not
512,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Hello Marc, Uroš,
On 10 Nov 21:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
and == for integer vectors of size 128. I was surprised not to find
_mm_cmplt_epi64 anywhere. Note that I can do
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
No extra includes required?
utility is already included in wide-int.h and rtl.h, should probably move
The patch below break bootstrap on darwin
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811):
Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base)):
Dispatch according to whether allocators are always
This patch failed regtesting -- and on second thought I'm not too
confident that the refactoring is strictly an improvement so I will
try to fix the main issue (that is to make the test vrp-1.c fail to
compile) in a more direct way.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
Hi,
This patch tweaks the VRP code to simply inspect the need_assert_for
bitmap when determining whether any asserts need to be inserted.
Consequently we no longer have to manually keep track of whether a call
to
From 98bb6d7323ce79e28be8ef892b919391ed857e1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:43:32 +
Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64, RTL] Bics instruction generation for aarch64
Hi,
This patch adds rtl patterns for aarch64 to generate bics instructions
On 11/11/14 10:49 +0100, FX wrote:
The patch below break bootstrap on darwin
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811):
Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base)):
Dispatch
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:27:50PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:07:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
To be constructive here - the above
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
No extra includes required?
Hi all,
As this trivial PR says, found is not initialised, later conditionally
set to true in the for loop that follows and gcc_asserted in the end.
It is expected that the found = true; statement will always be hit, but
in case something elsewhere goes wrong and it is not, we want the
On 11 Nov 10:28, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Hello Marc, Uroš,
On 10 Nov 21:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
and == for integer vectors of size 128. I was surprised not to find
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:45:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Index: gcc/c/c-decl.c
===
--- gcc/c/c-decl.c(revision 217287)
+++ gcc/c/c-decl.c(working copy)
@@ -606,6 +606,8 @@
/* If warn_cxx_compat, a list of
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
@@ -7506,12 +7509,19 @@
/* Finish up struct info used by -Wc++-compat. */
static void
-warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct (tree fieldlist)
+warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct (tree fieldlist, location_t record_loc)
{
unsigned int ix;
tree x;
struct
2014-11-11 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
PR fortran/63701
* trans-expr.c (gfc_get_tree_for_caf_expr): Initialise found to
false.init-found.patch
OK, thanks for the patch.
FX
Hi,
As Ramana hinted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00607.html
There are two issues with the way we've defined our BSL pattern. We pun
types around in a way that is scary and quite likely unsafe, and we
haven't canonicalized the pattern so combine is unlikely to pick it
Hello,
last patch, extending == and to size 256. Regtested as usual.
Is the branch ready to be merged into trunk?
--
Marc GlisseIndex: ChangeLog.x86-intrinsics-ext
===
--- ChangeLog.x86-intrinsics-ext(revision 217319)
+++
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:13:32PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
@@ -7506,12 +7509,19 @@
/* Finish up struct info used by -Wc++-compat. */
static void
-warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct (tree fieldlist)
+warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct (tree fieldlist,
On 10/11/14 21:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/11/14 16:00 -0800, Siva Chandra wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for the associative containers
(set, map, multiset and multimap) and their unordered versions. I
think the GDB Python API is not rich enough to implement
On 11/11/2014 09:30 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I just don't like all the as_a/is_a stuff enforced everywhere,
it means more typing, more temporaries, more indentation.
So, as I view it, instead of the checks being done cheaply (yes, I think
the gimple checking as we have right now is very cheap)
Hi all,
This is the aarch64 implementation of the macro fusion hook, used to
fuse mov+movk instructions together.
A new field is declared in the tuning struct and as we add more fuseable
ops in the future we will fill in more bits in the fuseable_ops field.
Bootstrapped and tested on
Hi all,
This is the arm implementation of the macro fusion hook.
It tries to fuse movw+movt operations together. It also tries to take
lo_sum RTXs into account since those generate movt instructions as well.
Bootstrapped and tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 11/10/2014 09:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
I checked in this patch to revert the accidental checkin.
Sorry about that, and thanks for fixing it.
Bernd
This makes it so that gnatmake echoes the full command line passed to ranlib.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2014-11-11 Simon Wright si...@pushface.org
PR ada/42978
* mlib-utl.adb (ar): Output the options passed to ranlib.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex:
Hi all,
This patch models the latency of moves between FP and GP registers on
the A15 and A57 a bit more accurately by splitting the reservations for
FP-GP and GP-FP moves and adding an appropriate bypass.
Bootstrapped and tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
Ok
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:51:41AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
This patch is a replacement for the 2nd VRP refactoring patch. It
simply teaches VRP to look through widening type conversions when
finding suitable edge assertions, e.g.
bool p = x != y;
int q = (int) p;
if (q == 0) // new edge assert: p == 0 and therefore x == y
The new testcase requires that
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
This patch refactors the VRP edge-assertion code to make it always
traverse SSA-name definitions in order to find suitable edge assertions
to insert. Currently SSA-name definitions get traversed only when the
LHS of
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:51:41AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
do $subject, and cleanup for always
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
This patch refactors the VRP edge-assertion code to make it always
traverse SSA-name definitions in order to find suitable edge assertions
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ if (fieldlist == NULL_TREE)
+{
+ warning_at (record_loc, OPT_Wc___compat,
+ empty %s has size 0 in C, 1 in C++,
+ (struct_parse_info-code == RECORD_TYPE) ? struct :
union);
+}
+
I think this won't
Hi.
If no --with-cpu is specified at configure time gcc/config.gcc sets the
cpu option in configure_default_options to `v9' in sparc64 targets.
This leads to the usage of the following spec by the driver:
%{!m32:%{!mcpu=*:-mcpu=v9}}
Which in turn triggers the usage of -Av9 by default when
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
This patch refactors the VRP edge-assertion code to make it
Now that CLooG is no longer used by GCC, it makes sense to also remove it from
the main configure file. Especially as the in-tree build currently only works
if also CLooG is available.
Build on x86-64-gnu-linux - and tested that Graphite still works.*
OK for the trunk?
[* I did see a failure
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Siva Chandra sivachan...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/11/14 21:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/11/14 16:00 -0800, Siva Chandra wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which adds xmethods
On 11.11.2014 14:01, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Now that CLooG is no longer used by GCC, it makes sense to also remove it from
the main configure file. Especially as the in-tree build currently only works
if also CLooG is available.
Build on x86-64-gnu-linux - and tested that Graphite still works.*
Hi,
On 11/10/2014 06:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I don't think we want to suppress this warning in general. The
problem in this PR is that the warning code is failing to recognize
that the first operand is constant false.
Thanks. Then, shall we do something like the below? Passes testing.
Hi,
On 11 Nov 08:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For the middle-end and libgomp changes, can you talk to the Intel folks to
update their git branch to latest trunk (so that you have the nvptx bits in
there) and send middle-end and libgomp diffs against that?
As far as I remember, most of the changes
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
last patch, extending == and to size 256. Regtested as usual.
Is the branch ready to be merged into trunk?
2014-11-10 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
* config/i386/emmintrin.h (_mm_cmpeq_epi8,
On 11/11/2014 08:04 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- tree cond = RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
+ tree cond
+ = maybe_constant_value (fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae
+ (RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)), tf_none));
I like this approach, but if the result of
This merges patterns from associate_plusminus and adjusts them with
details from their fold-const.c pendants. It also fixes missing
flag_sanitize checks on negate contraction on the way.
This shows places where folds STRIP_NOPs was important (but also
shows where it may create wrong code - sth
On 11/11/2014 12:52 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I'll might put this to the SD-6 list because it would be nice to have
clarity - even if it's implementation defined.
Sounds good. I was thinking that defining to 0 tells the user this
isn't supported which seems more useful than this may or may
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Tobias Burnus
tobias.bur...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Now that CLooG is no longer used by GCC, it makes sense to also remove it from
the main configure file. Especially as the in-tree build currently only works
if also CLooG is available.
Build on
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
This patch refactors the VRP edge-assertion code to make it always
traverse SSA-name definitions in order to find suitable edge assertions
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
This patch is a replacement for the 2nd VRP refactoring patch. It
simply teaches VRP to look through widening type conversions when
finding suitable edge assertions, e.g.
bool p = x != y;
int q = (int) p;
if (q ==
Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 11 Nov 08:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For the middle-end and libgomp changes, can you talk to the Intel folks to
update their git branch to latest trunk (so that you have the nvptx bits in
there) and send middle-end and libgomp diffs against that?
As far as I
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:19:55 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
The patches implementing __builtin_acc_on_device are still in
processing. For the time being this patch removes the dependency on
that builtin in the OpenACC runtime.
Julian
-xx-xx Julian Brown
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:20:14 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This patch provides some documentation for the new OpenACC bits in
libgomp.
Julian
-xx-xx Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
James Norris jnor...@codesourcery.com
libgomp/
Hi,
As mentioned in the previous mail in this series, testing the OpenACC
runtime support in libgomp is going to be awkward until the associated
middle-end pieces are ready. This stop-gap patch helps to allow tests
(that don't use any of the pragmas, only calling the run-time library
directly) to
Hi,
The patch extends shift permutations technique on power of 2 cases
(previously even/odd transformations was used unconditionally).
Basically the patch just add loop for load group of length 2, like it
is done in vect_permute_load_chain function.
For Silvermont it reduces insn sequence for
Hello.
Following patch adds checking for aliasing support. Patch can bootstrap on
x86_64-apple-darwin1 and is part of patches needed for bootstrap restory on the
target. I plan to introduce additional patch that will cover testsuite failures
for the target.
Ready for trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko evstu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The patch extends shift permutations technique on power of 2 cases
(previously even/odd transformations was used unconditionally).
Basically the patch just add loop for load group of length 2, like it
is done
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Hello.
Following patch adds checking for aliasing support. Patch can bootstrap on
x86_64-apple-darwin1 and is part of patches needed for bootstrap restory on
the target. I plan to introduce additional patch that will cover
FX,
It looks like you missed patching a few configure files...
libjava/classpath/configure
libjava/configure
are definitely needed while
libgo/configure
zlib/configure
should be added for completeness.
Jack
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:15 AM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com
On 11/11/2014 12:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:08:54PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
@@ -662,9 +662,49 @@ func_checker::compare_gimple_call (gimpl
t1 = gimple_call_fndecl (s1);
t2 = gimple_call_fndecl (s2);
Just drop these and compare gimple_call_fn only.
+
It looks like you missed patching a few configure files...
libjava/classpath/configure
libjava/configure
Aren’t those under external control? i.e. maintained out of GCC tree?
libgo/configure
zlib/configure
Those are maintained upstream, and we import them directly. I’ve filed a bug
Hi all!
I found another issue of mklog.
Example:
--- a/gcc/asan.h
+++ b/gcc/asan.h
@@ -103,4 +103,14 @@ asan_intercepted_p (enum built_in_function fcode)
|| fcode == BUILT_IN_STRNCMP
|| fcode == BUILT_IN_STRNCPY;
}
+
+/* Convert LEN to HOST_WIDE_INT if possible.
+ Returns
On 30 October 2014 08:54, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com wrote:
2014-10-30 Ganesh Gopalasubramanian ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com
Check the whitespace in your ChangeLog line.
* config/arm/types.md (define_attr type): Add prefetch.
The existing
On 30 September 2014 16:00, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (CALL_USED_REGISTERS): Mark LR as caller-save.
(EPILOGUE_USES): Guard the check by epilogue_completed.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_layout_frame): Explictly check for LR.
On 31 October 2014 11:21, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Following up from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg03153.html
this fixes up the aarch64 port
accordingly to guard CUMULATIVE_ARGS properly so that we can remove the enum
keyword from machine_mode.
OK
On 11/11/14 09:46, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Attached patch make mklog to stop search for changes inside function
once '}' occur.
Ok, to commit?
OK. Thanks.
Diego.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:10:29 +0100
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:43:38PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
I'll post a separate patch with the fortran tests later. If
anyone wants to test this patch, please use gomp-4_0-branch
instead. You don't need a
Hi!
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:11:08 +0200, I wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:42:32 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
ce...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 07/11/2014 03:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
To avoid duplication of work: with Jakub's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:45 AM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like you missed patching a few configure files...
libjava/classpath/configure
libjava/configure
Aren’t those under external control? i.e. maintained out of GCC tree?
However these are maintained, the libjava
Hello!
This patch implements what I understood from Joseph's
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-10/msg00280.html
and also adds clang compatible builtins (which implement
small subset of the typegeneric ones).
Besides the clang compatibility builtins, there are 3 new
type-generic builtins,
Hi,
On 11/11/2014 02:19 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/11/2014 08:04 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
-tree cond = RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0));
+tree cond
+ = maybe_constant_value (fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae
+ (RECUR (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0)), tf_none));
I like this
Since you are simply patching all the configure files, the question
seems academic unless you switch to properly regenerating all of the
configure files using a fixed libtool.m4.
I am actually proposing to fix libtool.m4 and regenerate the configure scripts
(which gives the same result as
Hi!
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:00:46 -0700, Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 07/25/2014 09:01 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
[...] you may directly fold in the following patch to nuke the
unused OMP_LIST_COPY (or do that later).
--- gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
+++
Michael,
Why does the configure change match with p*-*-aix... instead of power*
or powerpc*? Yes, it's unique and will match, but why make it as
short as possible, which doesn't match other uses?
In your documentation, how are you distinguishing between Dynamic
Linking and Runtime Linking?
Hi!
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
This patch is the first step to enabling parallel
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:59:03PM +0100, FX wrote:
Since you are simply patching all the configure files, the question
seems academic unless you switch to properly regenerating all of the
configure files using a fixed libtool.m4.
I am actually proposing to fix libtool.m4 and regenerate
Tobias,
The only new regression seen in gcc trunk when using isl 0.14
with my mockup isl_0.14.diff patch is the failure...
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/graphite/isl-codegen-loop-dumping.c
scan-tree-dump-times graphite ISL AST generated by ISL: \\nfor
(int c1 = 0; c1 n - 1; c1 += 1)\\n
OK.
Jason
Many thanks. Here is the new patch that fixes the main problem of the previous
one
(i.e separation of the loop after unroll and jam) as well as the problems raised
by you (see comments below).
Now the code with the separation class option looks:
ISL AST generated by ISL:
{
for (int c0 = 0;
Changed the option to -floop-unroll-and jam as you suggested.
The patch takes advantage of the new isl based code generator introduced
recently
in GCC (in fact of the possible options for building the AST).
The code generated for this optimization in the case of non-constant loop
Hello,
here is the combined patch+ChangeLog. I'll run a last regtest just before
committing. Ok for trunk?
2014-11-12 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
gcc/
* config/i386/xmmintrin.h (_mm_add_ps, _mm_sub_ps, _mm_mul_ps,
_mm_div_ps, _mm_store_ss, _mm_cvtss_f32): Use vector
On 11/08/2014 06:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/explicit73.C
@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
// the template
namespace N {
- template class T class foo; // { dg-error } referenced below
+ template class T class foo; // { dg-error { target { ! c++11 } } }
Hi!
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:03:05 +0100, I wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
This
Resending as text/plain
On 11 November 2014 15:14, Charles Baylis charles.bay...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 November 2014 10:19, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This generates out-of-range errors at compile- (rather than assemble-)time
for the vqdm*_lane intrinsics, and also provides
As pre-approved by Joseph the following removes pedantic_lvalues
which the C FE now handles itself without help from fold-const.c.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
The C++ FE is still not happy without NON_LVALUE_EXPRs though.
Richard.
2014-11-11 Richard
On 27/10/14 09:21, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
+/* Handle pragmas for compatibility with Intel's compilers. */
+#define REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS() do {
\
+ c_register_pragma (0, long_calls, aarch64_pr_long_calls);
\
+ c_register_pragma (0,
[Resending in gcc-patches-accepted form]
I'm working on a patch for vget_lane (that removes the be_checked_get_lane thing
which isn't an intrinsic). Other than that, no not yet - loads and stores I was
thinking to wait until David Sherwood + Alan Hayward's patches have been
settled, but
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
