On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 03:38 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of "(signed T)((unsigned
>> T)base + step))". This complicates other optimizations/analysis depending
>> on SCEV because it's hard to dive into ty
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 03:36 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Loop niter computes inaccurate bound information for different loops.
>> This
>> patch is to improve it by using loop initial condition in
>> determine_value_range. Generally, loop niter is co
Reported as fixing the library on OS X Yosemite:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2015-q3/msg00147.html
Committed to trunk as r226882.
Committed to gcc-5-branch as r226883.
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
* jit-playback.c (invoke_driver): On OS X, add
"-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" to the driver
Hi all.
These two patches are refactoring of dominator-related code.
The comment in dominance.c says: "We work in a poor-mans object oriented
fashion, and carry an instance of this structure through all our 'methods'". So,
the first patch converts the mentioned structure (dom_info) into a class w
Ughh... what was supposed to be a short hack turned out to be 2 days of
pure torture.
So...I'm implementing task priorities as per the 4.1 standard, and
decided to use a priority queue. Since we already have splay trees in
libgomp, I figured these priority queues could be built on top of them
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:50 AM, FX wrote:
>> And yet, that patch has absolutely nothing to do with libbacktrace.
>> Hmmm. Let's try this one.
>
> Works perfectly with the patch:
Patch tested and committed with this ChangeLog entry.
2015-08-13 Ian Lance Taylor
* dwarf.c (read_function_entry
On 08/05/2015 01:44 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr66314.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr66314.c:1:0: warning:
-fsanitize=address and -fsanitize=kernel-address are not supported for this
target
Fixing this is ever-so-slight
On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
>> It was discovered that with the attached test case compiled with -O2
>> -funroll-loops, the regrename pass renamed one of the registers ($2)
>> to $8 that was not saved by the prologue.
>>
>> The attached patch fixes it by defining mac
On 07/28/2015 03:38 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of "(signed T)((unsigned
T)base + step))". This complicates other optimizations/analysis depending
on SCEV because it's hard to dive into type conversions. For many cases,
such type conversions can be sim
On 07/28/2015 03:36 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
Loop niter computes inaccurate bound information for different loops. This
patch is to improve it by using loop initial condition in
determine_value_range. Generally, loop niter is computed by subtracting
start var from end var in loop exit condition
On 08/13/2015 04:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/12/2015 10:24 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will
asynch-exceptions
Jeff> be tested and
On 08/13/2015 04:12 AM, David Sherwood wrote:
Hi,
This patch follows on from
[PATCH][1/N] Change GET_MODE_INNER to always return a non-void mode
It is another tidy up, replacing the pattern
GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (m)) with GET_MODE_UNIT_BITSIZE (m). Also
replaces any calls to GET_MOD
On 08/13/2015 12:09 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
There was a recent change which causes ira-int.h to depend on recog.h..
but doesnt include it. Every file which needs it included it before I
think, it just required some shuffling of order.
By including recog.h in ira-int.h ordering issues are fixe
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
+/* Fold A - (A & B) into ~B & A. */
+(simplify
+ (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (bit_and:c @0 @1)))
I think you want :s on the bit_and and its convert?
Ok, I keep forgetting about thi
On 08/13/2015 02:29 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 08/05/2015 08:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Building some targets results in a warning about orig_dup[i] potentially
being used uninitialised. I think the warning is fair, since it isn't
obvious that the reog_data-based lo
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > Yes. And there are much worse problems, like many things not working
> > right if your HOST_WIDE_INT would happen to be more than 64 bits; we
> > cannot really shake those out because there is
Jeff Law writes:
> On 08/05/2015 08:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Building some targets results in a warning about orig_dup[i] potentially
>> being used uninitialised. I think the warning is fair, since it isn't
>> obvious that the reog_data-based loop bound remains unchanged between:
>>
>>
Trevor Saunders writes:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:03:36PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 08/12/2015 12:57 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >Jeff Law writes:
>> >>On 08/10/2015 06:05 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
>> >>>From: Trevor Saunders
>> >>>
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>In many places gcc
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is patch for adding march/mtune options for Skylake.
>
> Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
>
> Is it OK for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
> ChangeLog:
> 2015-08-13 Yuri Rumyantsev
>
> * confi
Robert Suchanek writes:
> Hi,
>
> It was discovered that with the attached test case compiled with -O2
> -funroll-loops, the regrename pass renamed one of the registers ($2)
> to $8 that was not saved by the prologue.
>
> The attached patch fixes it by defining macro HARD_REGNO_RENAME_OK
> that re
Looks good to me...
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX stdio.h header includes code specific for C++ that looks like:
>
> extern "C" {
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> #ifdef ferror
> #undef ferror
> inline int ferror(FILE * _p)
> {
> return ((_p)->_flag & _IOERR);
> }
>
> I'm currently working on migrating debugging information for Ada from GNAT
> encodings to standard DWARF. At the moment, I have worked on two topics that
> I believe are not (completely) supported in standard DWARF:
>
> - fixed point types with arbitrary scale factors;
> - scalar types with b
On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Yes. And there are much worse problems, like many things not working
> right if your HOST_WIDE_INT would happen to be more than 64 bits; we
> cannot really shake those out because there is no actual system to
> test that on -- but it also
There was a recent change which causes ira-int.h to depend on recog.h..
but doesnt include it. Every file which needs it included it before I
think, it just required some shuffling of order.
By including recog.h in ira-int.h ordering issues are fixed, and we can
simply remove recog.h form eve
> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:02:43 +0200
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [graphite] Constrain only on INTEGER_TYPE
> From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
> To: tob...@grosser.es
> CC: hiradi...@msn.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; s@samsung.com;
> seb...@gmail.com
>
> O
On Aug 13, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ok, then guard the << >> with __GCC__ and do the expensive bit stuff
> otherwise. Just to cater for other host compilers doing sth unsensibly
> implementation defined.
Ick. The guard should be specific to the implementation defined semantic o
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 7:20 AM
> To: Robert Suchanek; Moore, Catherine
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH][MIPS] Fix register renaming in the interrupt handlers
>
> I'd like to gi
AIX stdio.h header includes code specific for C++ that looks like:
extern "C" {
#ifdef __cplusplus
#ifdef ferror
#undef ferror
inline int ferror(FILE * _p)
{
return ((_p)->_flag & _IOERR);
}
#endif /*ferror*/
which generates code that makes the AIX linker and loader rather upset
because t
On 08/12/2015 11:36 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> In many places gcc puts classes in the anon namespace so the compiler can tell
> they do not get inheritted from to enable better devirtualization.
C++ does not allow class members to have static linkage, so there is no way to
tell the compiler that
On 13/08/15 10:37 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
Now that most systems have uchar.h for conversion between char16_t*
and char32_t* to multibyte (analogue of wchar.h and cwchar) i think we
should check off this last little crumb of C++11.
Ooh, I forgot about this, thanks!
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:31:35PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> This patch has caused a bootstrap failure on AIX.
>
> reverted, though my bet is this is some sort of generic devirt bug on
> aix.
bootstrap with GCC 5 does not help.
- Da
On 12/08/15 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Matthew Wahab wrote:
PR target/67143
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr67143.c: New
What's architecture-specific about this test? That is, why doesn't it
just go in gcc.c-torture/compile (no dg- directives needed, automatically
Greetings,
Now that most systems have uchar.h for conversion between char16_t* and
char32_t* to multibyte (analogue of wchar.h and cwchar) i think we
should check off this last little crumb of C++11.
I submitted this a while back but Jonathan suggested improvements and it
took me a hot minut
And a small correction.
On 13 August 2015 at 10:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Here's the patch for the rest of the C++17 support.
>
> On 13 August 2015 at 09:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 12 August 2015 at 23:54, Dijk, J. van wrote:
>>> Thanks for the clarification. I hope the attached patch
This commits the patch from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00663.html and adds
tests for all the mutex types.
Eelis, thanks for the patch. Please CC the libstdc++ list for all
libstdc++ patches, I don't subscribe to gcc-patches and only saw your
mail because Ville brought it to my
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:52:00PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2015.08.13 at 15:40 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:11:53PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Rather ubsan should not complain about implementation defined behavior (or
> > > should separate those
On 2015.08.13 at 15:40 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:11:53PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Rather ubsan should not complain about implementation defined behavior (or
> > should separate those cases out with a different switch compared to
> > undefined
> > behavior).
>
Subject says it all.
Tested ppc64le-linux, committing to trunk.
commit d7f997a59a1383b7f08618fbf1d7855edb5fa012
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Thu Aug 13 10:27:59 2015 +0100
* include/bits/alloc_traits.h: Add feature-test macro.
* include/bits/allocator.h: Likewise.
* include/
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:11:53PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Rather ubsan should not complain about implementation defined behavior (or
> should separate those cases out with a different switch compared to undefined
> behavior).
I think ubsan doesn't complain about implementation-defined beha
On 7/31/2015 6:06 PM, John Marino wrote:
> So far, DragonFly only handles the C/POSIX locale through the "generic"
> locale support files, similar to FreeBSD and Darwin. The following
> patchset enables nearly complete support for named locales. The except
> is for std:messages which requires get
Hi,
in this ICE on invalid, during error recovery resolve_typename_type gets
a TYPE which has a DECLTYPE_TYPE as TYPE_CONTEXT and
CLASSTYPE_PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_TYPE ICEs on the latter. Checking
CLASS_TYPE_P and thus returning the TYPE as is avoids the ICE and passes
testing on x86_64-linux.
Th
Due to PR67205, the deeply nested instantiations require trampolines,
which in turn requires an executable stack for the GNAT tools on
architectures such as x86_64.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, and make check-ada
reports no unexpected failures.
Okay for trunk?
--
Florian Weimer / Re
On 03/08/15 14:01, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:55:33AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch implements an aarch64-specific expansion of the signed modulo by a
power of 2.
The proposed sequence makes use of the conditional negate instruction CSNEG.
For a power
Simply register an != 0 expression for them. This should solve Honzas
request to optimize away != 0 checks for this pointers during early opts.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-08-13 Richard Biener
* tree.c (nonnull_arg_p): Move from ...
Hi,
> > > gcc/
> > > * config/mips/mips.h (ENABLE_LD_ST_PAIRS): Enable load/store pairs for
> > > I6400.
>
> Sorry, I missed this one. OK to commit.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
Committed as r226860.
Regards,
Robert
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Did you have a chance to look at updated patch?
Having a quick look now. Btw, you didn't try the simpler alternative of
tree type = type_for_mode (int_mode_for_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype)));
build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_
Hi Richard,
Did you have a chance to look at updated patch?
Thanks.
Yuri.
2015-08-06 14:07 GMT+03:00 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> HI All,
>
> Here is updated patch which implements Richard proposal to use vector
> comparison with boolean result instead of target hook. Support for it
> was added to ix86_e
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:31:48AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> > * This is the only platform for which I bothered collecting any sort
>> > of performance data:
>> >
>> > As best I can tell, there is a 9% improvement in
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:31:35PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> This patch has caused a bootstrap failure on AIX.
>
> reverted, though my bet is this is some sort of generic devirt bug on
> aix.
There have been a lot of issues with GCC'
I'd like to give Catherine chance to review this, I notice a couple
of formatting nits in the test case:
Robert Suchanek writes:
> a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/interrupt_handler-bug-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/interrupt_handler-bug-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..877d00c
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2015.08.13 at 12:56 +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
>> Le 12/08/2015 22:07, Richard Sandiford a écrit :
>> > Jeff Law writes:
>> >> On 08/12/2015 12:32 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>> On August 12, 2015 8:07:13 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:11 PM, David Sherwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to bother people again. Is this OK to go now?
Hmm, why don't you go the vectorized function call path for this,
implementing the builtin_vectorized_function target hook?
Richard.
> Thanks!
> David.
>
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 29
On 2015.08.13 at 12:56 +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 12/08/2015 22:07, Richard Sandiford a écrit :
> > Jeff Law writes:
> >> On 08/12/2015 12:32 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On August 12, 2015 8:07:13 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 11:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
Hi,
It was discovered that with the attached test case compiled with -O2
-funroll-loops,
the regrename pass renamed one of the registers ($2) to $8 that was not
saved by the prologue.
The attached patch fixes it by defining macro HARD_REGNO_RENAME_OK that returns
zero iff the current function is
Le 13/08/2015 12:56, Mikael Morin a écrit :
Still, implementation-defined behavior is a progress over undefined
behaviour.
Even if it's not set in stone, the good thing about
implementation-defined behaviour is that it's known to be non-random.
So it can be checked, either with autoconf, or with
Le 12/08/2015 22:07, Richard Sandiford a écrit :
Jeff Law writes:
On 08/12/2015 12:32 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On August 12, 2015 8:07:13 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/12/2015 11:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Prec is almost never a constant and is heavily used from wide-int.
We are
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> On m68k:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c scan-tree-dump vrp1 "Folding predicate.*== 1
>> to 0"
>>
>> $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c -O2
>> -fdump-tree-vrp1 -S
>> $ grep -c Folding *.vrp1
> > gcc/
> > * config/mips/mips.h (ENABLE_LD_ST_PAIRS): Enable load/store pairs for
> > I6400.
Sorry, I missed this one. OK to commit.
Thanks,
Matthew
Hi,
This patch follows on from
[PATCH][1/N] Change GET_MODE_INNER to always return a non-void mode
It is another tidy up, replacing the pattern
GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (m)) with GET_MODE_UNIT_BITSIZE (m). Also
replaces any calls to GET_MODE_PRECISION (GET_MODE_INNER (m)) with
GET_MODE_U
Hi,
Sorry to bother people again. Is this OK to go now?
Thanks!
David.
> >
> > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, David Sherwood wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have added new STRICT_MAX_EXPR and STRICT_MIN_EXPR expressions to
> > > > support the
> > > > IEEE versions of fmin and fmax. This is d
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>> I don't think the right shifts are an issue at all.
>>
>> Well, they're implementation-defined, at least in C.
>
>> The C11 wording for E1 >> E2 is "If E1 has a signed type and a neg
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 10:33 PM, Aditya Kumar wrote:
>>
>> Passes bootstrap, no regressions.
>>
>> With this patch gcc bootstraps with graphite.
>> make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fgraphite-identity -floop-interchange
>> -floop-block"
>
>
> LGTM, but plea
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/12/2015 10:24 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will
>>> asynch-exceptions
>>> Jeff> be tested and the like.
>>>
>>> It seems t
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On ia64 and arm64:
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times fre2
> "free" 10
>
> $ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -nostdinc++
> -Iia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/ia64-suse-linux
> -Iia
On ia64 and arm64:
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times fre2 "free"
10
$ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -nostdinc++
-Iia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/ia64-suse-linux
-Iia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I../libstdc++-v3/libsupc
Just remove the assert which I now know how it can trigger without
causing harm.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-08-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/67191
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (sccvn_dom_walker::before_dom_children): Remove
Hi All,
Here is patch for adding march/mtune options for Skylake.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
Is it OK for trunk?
ChangeLog:
2015-08-13 Yuri Rumyantsev
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host_detect_local_cpu): Add support
for skylake.
* config/i386/i386.c (PTA
Here's the patch for the rest of the C++17 support.
On 13 August 2015 at 09:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 23:54, Dijk, J. van wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification. I hope the attached patch against current
>> wwwdocs will be of use (only the name of the feature test macro is
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On m68k:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c scan-tree-dump vrp1 "Folding predicate.*== 1 to
> 0"
>
> $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c -O2
> -fdump-tree-vrp1 -S
> $ grep -c Folding *.vrp1
> 0
I suppose for logical-op-non-sh
Hi Steve,
Overall, I don't think these optimizations are ready to include. In principle
the idea looks good but it is done at the wrong point in the compiler in my
opinion.
The biggest concern I have is that the analysis should be possible at (or
prior to) the point where the prologue/epilogue ar
On m68k:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c scan-tree-dump vrp1 "Folding predicate.*== 1 to 0"
$ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c -O2
-fdump-tree-vrp1 -S
$ grep -c Folding *.vrp1
0
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1
On 12 August 2015 at 23:54, Dijk, J. van wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. I hope the attached patch against current
> wwwdocs will be of use (only the name of the feature test macro is missing
> in the new file cxx1z.html; did not manage to find that.)
Thanks, I've committed the attached ch
Ping.
Thanks,
bin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of "(signed T)((unsigned
> T)base + step))". This complicates other optimizations/analysis depending
> on SCEV because it's hard to dive into type conversions. For many cas
Ping.
Thanks,
bin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Loop niter computes inaccurate bound information for different loops. This
> patch is to improve it by using loop initial condition in
> determine_value_range. Generally, loop niter is computed by subtracting
> start v
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Robert Suchanek
> Sent: 05 August 2015 09:31
> To: catherine_mo...@mentor.com; Matthew Fortune; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH, MIPS] Enable load/store bonding
Hi,
> > gcc/
> > * config/mips/mips.c (mips_rtx_cost_data): Remove costs for W32 and
> W64
> > pseudo-processors.
> > * config/mips/mips.md (processor): Remove w32 and w64.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Matthew
Committed as r226851.
Regards,
Robert
Given there is now PR67167 I am going forward with the earlier posted
patch to switch SCCVN to PHI elimination in favor of another PHI
(to remove IVs) rather than in favor of its only executable edge value.
I still see no way to capture both cases without detecting the choice
and re-numbering the
77 matches
Mail list logo
