Re: [PATCH v3] Simplify memchr with small constant strings

2022-09-09 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! On Wed, 2022-09-07 14:00:25 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 12:58 PM Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.cc:1258:42: error: array subscript 1 is > > outside array bounds of 'tree_node* [1]' [-Werror=array-bounds] > > 1258 | op[i

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: btf: Fix btf-datasec-1.c for RISC-V

2022-09-09 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
On May 10, 2022, at 6:31 PM, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote: > > LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all > other targets, so I assume I can approve that. Yes. Usual and customary for ports.

Re: [PATCH Rust front-end v2 02/37] gccrs: Add nessecary hooks for a Rust front-end testsuite

2022-09-09 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
Ok. > On Aug 24, 2022, at 4:59 AM, herron.phi...@googlemail.com wrote: > > From: Philip Herron > > This copy's over code from other front-end testsuites to enable testing > for the rust front-end specifically. > > Co-authored-by: Marc Poulhiès > Co-authored-by: Thomas Schwinge > --- >

Re: [PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches
On 9/9/22 8:47 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 07:56:42PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 9/9/22 8:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >>> btw, it needs some hacking in rs6000_function_arg to make this >>> opaque type valid for function arg. >> >> We don't allow (at this time)

Re: [PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 07:56:42PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 9/9/22 8:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: > > btw, it needs some hacking in rs6000_function_arg to make this > > opaque type valid for function arg. > > We don't allow (at this time) __vector_pair or __vector_quad to be > used as actual

Re: [PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches
On 9/9/22 8:27 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: > __attribute__((noipa)) > int foo(c){ > return 0; > } > > int main () > { > const __vector_quad c; > int r = foo(c); > return r; > } > > Checking during LTO WPA, verify_type only gets type "const > __vector_quad", no type "__vector_quad". > > btw, it

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xtensa: Make complex hard register clobber elimination more robust and accurate

2022-09-09 Thread Max Filippov via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:50 PM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa wrote: > > This patch eliminates all clobbers for complex hard registers that will > be overwritten entirely afterwards (supersedence of > 3867d414bd7d9e5b6fb2a51b1fb3d9e9e1eae9). > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > *

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] xtensa: Eliminate unused stack frame allocation/freeing

2022-09-09 Thread Max Filippov via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:38 PM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa wrote: > > Changes from v3: > (xtensa_expand_prologue): Changed to exclude debug insns from DF use chain > analysis. > > --- > > In the example below, 'x' is once placed on the stack frame and then read > into registers as the

Re: [PATCH] OpenMP, libgomp: Environment variable syntax extension.

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 11:13:52PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: > We already have such a header … > include/environ.h Ah, ok, then please just use it. Seems libgomp Makefile.am already includes -I$(top_srcdir)/../include So just include that and remove the extern char **environ; from the

Re: [PATCH] OpenMP, libgomp: Environment variable syntax extension.

2022-09-09 Thread Iain Sandoe
> On 9 Sep 2022, at 23:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:50:19PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Hi Jakub, >> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: libgomp/ChangeLog: >> [...] (initialize_env): Extended to parse the new syntax

Re: [PATCH] OpenMP, libgomp: Environment variable syntax extension.

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:50:19PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: > >> libgomp/ChangeLog: > [...] > >>(initialize_env): Extended to parse the new syntax of environment > >>variables. > > this patch broke

[committed] analyzer: implement trust boundaries via a plugin for Linux kernel

2022-09-09 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
This is a less ambitious version of: [PATCH 0/6] RFC: adding support to GCC for detecting trust boundaries https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584372.html Earlier versions of this patch attempted: (a) various ways of identifying "untrusted" memory regions (b) providing a

[committed] analyzer: add support for plugin-supplied known function behaviors

2022-09-09 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
This patch adds the ability for plugins to register "known functions" with the analyzer, identified by name. If -fanalyzer sees a call to such a function (with no body), it will use a plugin-provided subclass of the new known_function abstract base class to model the possible outcomes of the

[committed] analyzer: add test coverage for flexible array members [PR98247]

2022-09-09 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Pushed to trunk as r13-2571-g084dc9a0c6cec1. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/98247 * gcc.dg/analyzer/flexible-array-member-1.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm ---

Re: [PATCH] OpenMP, libgomp: Environment variable syntax extension.

2022-09-09 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Jakub, > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: >> libgomp/ChangeLog: [...] >> (initialize_env): Extended to parse the new syntax of environment >> variables. this patch broke Darwin bootstrap: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_environ",

stdatomic.h: Do not define ATOMIC_VAR_INIT for C2x

2022-09-09 Thread Joseph Myers
The macro ATOMIC_VAR_INIT, previously declared obsolete, is removed completely in C2x; disable it for C2x in GCC's implementation. (Although ATOMIC_* are reserved names for this header, disabling the macro for C2x still seems appropriate.) Bootstrapped with no regressions for

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Refactor implementation of operator+ for std::string

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 18:51, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote: > > On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote: > > Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of > > operator+ > > on std::string that makes sure we always use the best allocation strategy. > > > > I have

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 20:01, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > s/__weak/__is_weak/g perhaps? Yes, that'll do. Fixed by the attached, with a test to avoid it happening again. Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 11:46 AM Iain Sandoe via Libstdc++ > wrote: >> >> >> >> >

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

2022-09-09 Thread Thomas Rodgers via Gcc-patches
s/__weak/__is_weak/g perhaps? On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 11:46 AM Iain Sandoe via Libstdc++ < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > On 9 Sep 2022, at 19:36, Rainer Orth > wrote: > > > > >> Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches > >> that have been going around. I'm

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

2022-09-09 Thread Iain Sandoe via Gcc-patches
> On 9 Sep 2022, at 19:36, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches >> that have been going around. I'm testing this now. >> >> Please take a look. > > unfortunately, this patch broke macOS bootstrap (seen on >

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

2022-09-09 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Jonathan, > Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches > that have been going around. I'm testing this now. > > Please take a look. unfortunately, this patch broke macOS bootstrap (seen on x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2): In file included from

Re: [PATCH 3/3] libstdc++: Fix return type of empty zip/adjacent_transform [PR106803]

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, 18:27 Patrick Palka via Libstdc++, < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this series look OK for trunk? > All three are OK, thanks. > PR libstdc++/106803 > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * include/std/ranges

Re: [PATCH 2/3] libstdc++: Fix typo in adjacent_view::_Iterator [PR106798]

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, 18:25 Patrick Palka via Libstdc++, < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > PR libstdc++/106798 > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * include/std/ranges (adjacent_view::_Iterator::_Iterator): Fix > typo. > * testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/adjacent/1.cc

Re: [PATCH 1/3] libstdc++: Fix zip_view's operator- for integer-class difference type [PR106766]

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, 18:25 Patrick Palka via Libstdc++, < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > make_unsigned_t can't give us the unsigned version of an integer-class > difference type, so use __make_unsigned_like_t / __to_unsigned_like > instead. > OK, thanks > PR libstdc++/106766 > >

Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations

2022-09-09 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: > The sin and cos instructions for some reason are scaled by 2*PI radians (i.e. > 1.0 == 2*PI radians/360 degrees), so their inputs need to be scaled by > 1/(2*PI) first. I've implemented this as an expander to two instructions - one C2x has sinpi and

Re: [PATCH] Add __builtin_iseqsig()

2022-09-09 Thread FX via Gcc-patches
ping > Le 1 sept. 2022 à 23:02, FX a écrit : > > Attached patch adds __builtin_iseqsig() to the middle-end and C family > front-ends. > Testing does not currently check whether the signaling part works, because > with optimisation is actually does not (preexisting compiler bug: >

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Add IEEE_SIGNBIT and IEEE_FMA functions

2022-09-09 Thread FX via Gcc-patches
Hi Thomas, >> Both of these functions are new with Fortran 2018, could you add >> a standards version check? > > Thanks Thomas, I will do that and post here the commit diff. The check will > not be perfect, though, because the warning/error cannot be emitted when > loading the module (because

[PATCH 2/3] libstdc++: Fix typo in adjacent_view::_Iterator [PR106798]

2022-09-09 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
PR libstdc++/106798 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/ranges (adjacent_view::_Iterator::_Iterator): Fix typo. * testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/adjacent/1.cc (test04): New test. --- libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 2 +-

[PATCH 3/3] libstdc++: Fix return type of empty zip/adjacent_transform [PR106803]

2022-09-09 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this series look OK for trunk? PR libstdc++/106803 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/ranges (views::_ZipTransform::operator()): Fix return type in the empty case. (views::_AdjacentTransform::operator()): Likewise. ---

[PATCH 1/3] libstdc++: Fix zip_view's operator- for integer-class difference type [PR106766]

2022-09-09 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
make_unsigned_t can't give us the unsigned version of an integer-class difference type, so use __make_unsigned_like_t / __to_unsigned_like instead. PR libstdc++/106766 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/ranges (zip_view::_Iterator::operator-): Use __to_unsigned_like

Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Change insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to TARGET_POWERPC64 for VSX scalar extract/insert instructions

2022-09-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 01:59:02PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > In rs6000-overload.def, the vsx_ version built-ins are overridden to vec_ > version. How? Where? Instead, afaics they are defined in rs6000-builtins.def: const vd __builtin_vsx_extract_exp_dp (vd); VEEDP xvxexpdp {} const

Re: [Patch] libgomp: Add reverse-offload splay tree

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 01:15:24PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > For reverse-offload data handling, we need to support: > (a) device fn addr -> host fn address > (b) finding already mapped host -> device vars via their device address > > For (a), the functions addrs, we need some extra code (cf.

Re: [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:07:28AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > @Tom and Alexander: Better suggestions are welcome for the busy loop in > libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c regarding the variable placement and checking > its value. I'm afraid you need Alexander or Tom here, I don't feel I can review

Re: [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 05:56:09PM +0300, Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > > @Tom and Alexander: Better suggestions are welcome for the busy loop in > > libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c regarding the variable placement and checking > > its

Re: Modula-2: merge followup (brief update on the progress of the new linking implementation)

2022-09-09 Thread Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches
Martin Liška writes: >> gm2.texi. I see a few missing options (missing from gm2.texi) and also > > Do you have an example, please? -fscaffold-main was missing from gcc/doc/gm2.texi. I've git pushed a correction (and alphabetically sorted all options). >> I see problems with the libraries -

Re: [Patch][2/3][v2] nvptx: libgomp+mkoffload.cc: Prepare for reverse offload fn lookup

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 08:43:26PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Slightly revised version, fixing some issues in mkoffload.cc. Otherwise, the > same applies: > > On 25.08.22 19:30, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 25.08.22 16:54, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > The attached patch prepare for reverse-offload

Re: [Patch][2/3] GCN: libgomp+mkoffload.cc: Prepare for reverse offload fn lookup

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 25.08.22 16:54, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > The attached patch prepare for reverse-offload device->host > function-address lookup by requesting (if needed) the on-device address. > > > This patch adds the actual implementation for

Re: [Patch][1/3] libgomp: Prepare for reverse offload fn lookup

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Technically, this patch is stand alone, but conceptually it based on the > submitted but not reviewed patch: > "[Patch] OpenMP: Support reverse offload (middle end part)" >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] vect: inbranch SIMD clones

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:23:50PM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > > There has been support for generating "inbranch" SIMD clones for a long time, > but nothing actually uses them (as far as I can see). Thanks for working on this. Note, there is another case where the inbranch SIMD clones could

Re: Extend fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR in VLA manner

2022-09-09 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 15:51, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Sorry for the slow reply. I wrote a response a couple of weeks ago > but I think it get lost in a machine outage. > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > Hi, > > The attached prototype patch extends fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR > >

Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Refactor implementation of operator+ for std::string

2022-09-09 Thread Will Hawkins
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:05 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, 18:51 François Dumont via Libstdc++, > wrote: >> >> On 05/09/22 20:30, Will Hawkins wrote: >> > Based on Jonathan's work, here is a patch for the implementation of >> > operator+ >> > on std::string that makes

Re: [PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
on 2022/9/9 15:25, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:51 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: >> >> Hi Richi, >> >> Thanks for the review comments! >> >> on 2022/9/8 15:36, Richard Biener wrote: >>> >>> Am 08.09.2022 um 07:53 schrieb Kewen.Lin : Hi, As PR106833 shows,

[PATCH] testsuite: gluefile file need to be prefixed

2022-09-09 Thread Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches
PR/95720 When the status wrapper is used, the gluefile need to be prefixed with -Wl, in order for the test cases to have the dump files with the expected names. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc/testsuite/lib/g++.exp: Moved gluefile block to after flags have been prefixed for the

[PATCH v2] gcov: Respect triplet when looking for gcov

2022-09-09 Thread Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches
When testing a cross toolchain outside the build tree, the binary name for gcov is prefixed with the triplet. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp: Respect triplet when looking for gcov. * gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp: Likewise. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON ---

[PATCH] c++: remove '_sfinae' suffix from functions

2022-09-09 Thread Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
Each of the following functions instantiate_non_dependent_expr get_target_expr require_complete_type abstract_virtuals_error cxx_constant_value is (presumably for historical reasons) just a non-SFINAE-enabled wrapper for the corresponding SFINAE-enabled version that's suffixed by

Re: GCN: Add -mlow-precision-sqrt for double-precision sqrt [PR105246] (was: Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations)

2022-09-09 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 09/09/2022 13:20, Tobias Burnus wrote: However, the pre-existing 'sqrt' problem still is real. It also applies to reverse sqrt ("v_rsq"), but that's for whatever reason not used for GCN. This patch now adds a commandline flag - off by default - to choose whether this behavior is wanted. I

RE: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations

2022-09-09 Thread Stubbs, Andrew
> -Original Message- > I agree - for example powerpc has -mrecip= to control which instructions > to use (float/double rsqrt or inverse) and -mrecip-precision to > specify whether further iteration is done or not. > > x86 has similar but does always perform newton raphson iteration, >

[PATCH] tree-optimization/106722 - avoid invalid pointer association in predcom

2022-09-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
When predictive commoning builds a reference for iteration N it prematurely associates a constant offset into the MEM_REF offset operand which can be invalid if the base pointer then points outside of an object which alias-analysis does not consider valid. Bootstrapped and tested on

GCN: Add -mlow-precision-sqrt for double-precision sqrt [PR105246] (was: Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations)

2022-09-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 09.09.22 12:16, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote: -funsafe-math-optimizations implies -fno-signed-zeros, -fno-trapping-math, -fassociative-math, and -freciprocal-math. All of them reduce precision and my violate IEEE or ISO/language standards. However, I think

Re: Modula-2: merge followup (brief update on the progress of the new linking implementation)

2022-09-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 9/8/22 17:52, Gaius Mulley wrote: > Martin Liška writes: > >> Note I've just converted the current Modula-2 manual to RST (Sphinx): >> https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/ >> >> It contains some minor issues, but in general it should be pretty fine. Note >> pygments >> contains a

Re: [PATCH] gcov: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov

2022-09-09 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Torbjörn, > When testing a cross toolchain outside the build tree, the binary name > for gcov is prefixed with the tripplet. here and below: the beast is called triplet. > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov > *

[committed] libgomp: Fix up OMP_PROC_BIND handling [PR106894]

2022-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote: > + case PARSE_BIND: > + *(char *) (host_envvars[omp_var].dest[0]) > + = *(char *) params[0]; > + *(char *) (host_envvars[omp_var].dest[1]) > + = *(char *) params[1]; > +

Re: [PATCH] gcov: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov

2022-09-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 9/9/22 12:27, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > When testing a cross toolchain outside the build tree, the binary name > for gcov is prefixed with the tripplet. Ok, thanks! Martin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov > *

[PATCH] gcov: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov

2022-09-09 Thread Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches
When testing a cross toolchain outside the build tree, the binary name for gcov is prefixed with the tripplet. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/gcov/gcov.exp: Respect tripplet when looking for gcov * gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp: Likewise Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON ---

Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations

2022-09-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 09.09.22 10:10, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 08.09.22 22:38, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: > The instructions for the transcendental functions are documented to have > limited numerical precision, so they are only used if > unsafe_math_optimizations are

[PATCH] Makefile.tpl: pass CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD where appropriate

2022-09-09 Thread Ross Burton via Gcc-patches
If CXXFLAGS contains something unsupported by the build CXX, we see build failures (e.g. using -fmacro-prefix-map for the target). Ensure that CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD is passed where appropriate so that the correct flags are used. ChangeLog: * Makefile.in: Regenerate. * Makefile.tpl: Add

[PING x2] Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

2022-09-09 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2022/8/26 4:15 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2022/8/4 9:31 PM, Koning, Paul wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 4, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> >>> On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > with the way that

[committed] RISC-V: Suppress build warnings

2022-09-09 Thread Kito Cheng
../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: In function 'const char* riscv_multi_lib_check(int, const char**)': ../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:1451:11: error: bare apostrophe ''' in format [-Werror=format-diag] 1451 | "Can't find suitable multilib set for

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Implement TARGET_COMPUTE_MULTILIB

2022-09-09 Thread Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
Hi Andreas: Hm, I should change my default gcc on Ubuntu, I didn't got this when build with GCC 7, and can be reproduced by GCC 11, Will summit patch once I test done. On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 3:21 PM Andreas Schwab wrote: > > How did you test that? > >

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Support -fexcess-precision=16

2022-09-09 Thread Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
LGTM, seems like you have landed now, see you soon :) On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 5:44 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > This fixes f19a327077e ("Support -fexcess-precision=16 which will enable > FLT_EVAL_METHOD_PROMOTE_TO_FLOAT16 when backend supports _Float16.") on > RISC-V targets. > > gcc/ChangeLog >

[PATCH] tree-optimization/106881 - fix simple_control_dep_chain part

2022-09-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
This adjusts simple_control_dep_chain in the same way I adjusted compute_control_dep_chain_pdom to avoid adding fallthru edges to the predicate chain. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed. PR tree-optimization/106881 * gimple-predicate-analysis.cc

[PATCH] Document -fexcess-precision=16 in tm.texi

2022-09-09 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
I just happened to stuble on this one while trying to sort out the RISC-V bits. gcc/ChangeLog * doc/tm.texi (TARGET_C_EXCESS_PRECISION): Add 16. --- gcc/doc/tm.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi index

[PATCH] RISC-V: Support -fexcess-precision=16

2022-09-09 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
This fixes f19a327077e ("Support -fexcess-precision=16 which will enable FLT_EVAL_METHOD_PROMOTE_TO_FLOAT16 when backend supports _Float16.") on RISC-V targets. gcc/ChangeLog PR target/106815 * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_excess_precision): Add support for

[PATCH][GCC 12] arm: Fix constant immediates predicates and constraints for some MVE builtins

2022-09-09 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
This is a backport from trunk to gcc-12. Several MVE builtins incorrectly use the same predicate/constraint pair for several modes, which does not match the specification. This patch uses the appropriate iterator instead. 2022-09-06 Christophe Lyon gcc/ * config/arm/mve.md

Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations

2022-09-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 09.09.22 10:10, Andrew Stubbs wrote: On 08.09.22 22:38, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: The instructions for the transcendental functions are documented to have limited numerical precision, so they are only used if unsafe_math_optimizations are enabled for now. -funsafe-math-optimizations implies

[wwwdocs] Fix typo in description of tainted_args attribute

2022-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
Pushed to wwwdocs. --- htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html index c6dae27a..2cb5a654 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@

Re: [PATCH] amdgcn: Add support for additional natively supported floating-point operations

2022-09-09 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 08/09/2022 21:38, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: Hello This patch adds support for some additional floating-point operations, in scalar and vector modes, which are natively supported by the AMD GCN instruction set, but haven't been implemented in GCC yet. With the exception of frexp, these

Re: [PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:51 AM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi Richi, > > Thanks for the review comments! > > on 2022/9/8 15:36, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > >> Am 08.09.2022 um 07:53 schrieb Kewen.Lin : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> As PR106833 shows, cv-qualified opaque type can cause ICE > >> during

Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Implement TARGET_COMPUTE_MULTILIB

2022-09-09 Thread Andreas Schwab
How did you test that? ../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: In function 'const char* riscv_multi_lib_check(int, const char**)': ../../gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc:1451:11: error: bare apostrophe ''' in format [-Werror=format-diag] 1451 | "Can't find suitable multilib

Re: stddef.h: Add C2x unreachable macro

2022-09-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:32 PM Joseph Myers wrote: > > C2x adds a macro unreachable to stddef.h, with the same semantics as > __builtin_unreachable. Define this macro accordingly. > > Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to commit? OK. > gcc/ > *

[PATCH v2] Handle OPAQUE_TYPE specially in verify_type [PR106833]

2022-09-09 Thread Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
Hi Richi, Thanks for the review comments! on 2022/9/8 15:36, Richard Biener wrote: > > >> Am 08.09.2022 um 07:53 schrieb Kewen.Lin : >> >> Hi, >> >> As PR106833 shows, cv-qualified opaque type can cause ICE >> during LTO. It exposes that we missd to handle OPAQUE_TYPE >> well in type