Re: [wwwdocs, patch, committed] Updated Fortran part of http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html

2013-04-11 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/4/11 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html was so empty :-) I have committed the attached patch - comments and suggestions are welcome. Tobias Hi, Tobias, On behalf of Andes Technology Co., I am going to propose a new target contribution, nds32 port,

Re: [wwwdocs, patch, committed] Updated Fortran part of http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html

2013-04-11 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/4/11 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de: Hi Chung-Wu, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: On behalf of Andes Technology Co., I am going to propose a new target contribution, nds32 port, to GCC on June or July. If the contribution is adopted by the GCC Steering Committee and community, is following

Add myself to MAINTAINERS as Write After Approval

2013-04-10 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
Adding myself to the list of members in Write After Approval section. Index: ChangeLog === --- ChangeLog (revision 197662) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2013-04-10 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH, combine] Fix host-specific behavior in simplify_compare_const()

2013-04-10 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/4/9 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com: On behalf of Andes Technology Co., we have signed FSF agreement. However, so far I don't have svn write access yet. Would you please help to commit this patch? Jeff has kindly offered to sponsor you for write access, so you should be able to

Re: [PATCH, combine] Fix host-specific behavior in simplify_compare_const()

2013-04-07 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/4/7 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com: On 04/06/2013 01:42 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: On behalf of Andes Technology Co., we have signed FSF agreement. However, so far I don't have svn write access yet. Would you please help to commit this patch? Thanks again for the approval and I really appreciate

Re: [PATCH, combine] Fix host-specific behavior in simplify_compare_const()

2013-04-06 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/3/7 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com: 2013/3/5 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com: In other words, any 32-bit target with 'need_64bit_hwint=yes' in config.gcc is not able to have benefit from this optimization because it never passes the condition test. My solution is to use

Re: [PATCH, combine] Fix host-specific behavior in simplify_compare_const()

2013-03-06 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2013/3/5 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com: In other words, any 32-bit target with 'need_64bit_hwint=yes' in config.gcc is not able to have benefit from this optimization because it never passes the condition test. My solution is to use GET_MODE_MASK(mode) to filter out all bits not in

[PATCH, combine] Fix host-specific behavior in simplify_compare_const()

2013-02-27 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
Hi all, I notice the function simplify_compare_const() in gcc/combine.c presents different behavior between 32-bit host machine and 64-bit host machine, causing it to perform different RTL transformation for a 32-bit target. In the function: simplify_compare_const (enum rtx_code code, rtx op0,

<    1   2   3