Re: [RFA] PowerPC e5500 and e6500 cores support

Michael, Thanks for reviewing the patch and all the suggestions. I have some questions / comments bellow. Regards, Edmar On 05/17/2012 06:16 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: In the patch I minimized the number of changes, while not adding any new mask to target_flags. While we may get some bits

Re: [RFA] PowerPC e5500 and e6500 cores support

will hold until we have a formal ISA-2.07 document, and we are sure there is no conflict with the patch. - The rest that will be kept by Freescale. Thanks, Edmar On 05/21/2012 02:51 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: Regarding the implementation of popcntb, popcntd, and cmpb. Gcc has dedicated masks

Add myself to write-after-approval section of MAINTAINERS file

I have just committed the patch below to add myself to the write-after-approval section of the MAINTAINERS file. Thanks, Edmar ChangeLog: 2012-05-29 Edmar Wienskoskied...@freescale.com * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself. Index: MAINTAINERS

Re: [RFA] PowerPC e5500 and e6500 cores support

was regression tested for ppc64 target under these conditions: --enable-checking --disable-decimal-float --enable-languages=all svn revision number: 187734 We thank in advance for your time to review this patch. Regards, Edmar 2012-06-01 Edmar Wienskoskied...@freescale.com * config/rs6000

[PATCH] [PowerPC] [RFA] Fix PR target/53559 ICE on altivec builtins stv[l|r]x[l]

for powerpc64 target. Thanks Edmar

Re: [RFA] PowerPC e5500 and e6500 cores support

The patch I submitted had an omission. I failed to regenerate rs6000-tables.opt (Sorry, I misunderstood gcc_update --touch instructions) OK to commit the update ? 2012-06-05 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com * config/rs6000/rs6000-tables.opt: Regenerated. On 06/04/2012 08:45 PM

[RFC] [PowerPC] Patch to create new attribute type: popcnt

. - power6.md has different style. Created a separate reservation. I used instruction latency of 1. Please confirm. I did not added a store bypass either. Let me know if I should. Thanks, Edmar 2012-06-05 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (define_attr type

Re: [RFC] [PowerPC] Patch to create new attribute type: popcnt

parts exclusively. I am posting it as Michael manifested interest to have popcnt scheduling control for those IBM parts, and this happened while he was reviewing my E5500/E6500 patch. I understand if this patch still not right. I just don't want to leave a wrong impression. Thanks, Edmar

Re: [RFA] [PowerPC]

simplification possible, and the compiler always produces a nand instruction. The formula is equal to y (y-1) , maybe the testcase is testing that? Segher Ah, yes A neg/nand/and should be optimized into a sub -1/and. I will check why this is not happening. Thanks Edmar

[RFA] [PR44618] [PowerPC] Wrong code for -frename-registers

of the solution is acceptable, I would like to have it re-tested with the latest in 4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 and get it committed in all branches. Thanks Edmar 2010-06-21 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com * rs6000.md (save_gpregs_mode): Replaced pattern with a set of similar patterns

Re: [RFA] [PR44618] [PowerPC] Wrong code for -frename-registers

This time I put them in a tar file, to make sure the mail client don't mess with them. (ChangeLog is already inside the patch as well) After I complete the regression tests, I will post a new version against latest subversion revision. Will post it here and on bugzilla. Thanks, Edmar On 05

Re: [RFA] [PR44618] [PowerPC] Wrong code for -frename-registers

The patch gcc.fix_rnreg4 applies directly to 4.6, 4.7 (1 line offset), and 4.5 (-632 lines offset) Thanks, Edmar 2011-05-23 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com * gcc.target/powerpc/outofline_rnreg.c: New testcase. 2011-05-23 Edmar Wienskoski ed...@freescale.com * rs6000.md

PING [RFA] PowerPC e5500 and e6500 cores support

I am pinging this post: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00430.html Thanks Edmar

Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices@dwf_regno

Committed on trunk, revision 213596 Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597 I made an omission on the first commit. I did not add the test case and corresponding ChangeLog entry. Committed as obvious on trunk, revision 213598 Thanks Edmar On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: David

Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices@dwf_regno

Jackub, Thanks for point this up. I apologize for the sloppiness. I fixed and committed the ChangeLogs on the branch, revision 213639 Also fixed the libgcc ChangeLog on trunk. Revision 213640 Edmar On 08/05/2014 03:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Edmar

Re: powerpc64le configure fix

Alan, The first hunk will match powerpc64 as well. Edmar On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote: Another tweak for little-endian powerpc. Committed revision 198734. * configure.ac (HAVE_AS_TLS): Enable tests for powerpcle and powerpc64le

Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)

The e500v2 (SPE) hardware is such that if the address of vector (double world load / stores) are not double world aligned the instruction will trap. So this alignment is not optional. Edmar On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/07/2013 12:25 PM, Jakub