[Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

Hi again! Proposed patch to Bug 90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Best regards, José Rui 2020-4-19 José Rui Faustino de Sousa PR fortran/90350 * simplify.c (simplify_bound): In the case of

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

Hi Thomas! > ? In other words, maybe a check on the upper bound > of the last dimension would be better? > You mean enforcing: C928 (R921) The second subscript shall not be omitted from a subscript-triplet in the last dimension of an assumed-size array. right? If I have correctly

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

Hi all! Proposed patch to Bug 90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Bumped into the same problem. Probably a better fix would be to add an extra step to the reference chain reflecting that array-section

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/94327 and PR fortran/94331 Bind(C) problems

Hi all! Proposed patch to: Bug 94327 - Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set and to: Bug 94331 - Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Sorry for the double patch but applying them separately would break things. Fixing 94327 is simple, just

Re: [Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

Hi Thomas, On 21/04/20 16:38, Thomas Koenig wrote: Do you have commit privileges? It not, I can commit it for you. No i do not. I would be grateful if you could. Best regards, José Rui

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/66833,67938,95214 ICE on using assumed rank character array

Hi all! Proposed patch to PRs 66833, 67938 and 95214 ICE(s) on using assumed rank character array in different situations. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Simple patch only add assumed-rank to the list of possible attributes. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96870 - Class name on error message

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96870 - Class name on error message. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Make the error message more intelligible for the average user. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui 2020-8-21 José Rui Faustino de Sousa gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/95352 - ICE on select rank with assumed-size selector and lbound intrinsic

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR95352 - ICE on select rank with assumed-size selector and lbound intrinsic. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add check for NULL pointer before trying to access structure member, patch by Steve Kargl. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96724 - Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag -Wconversion-extra

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96724 - Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag -Wconversion-extra. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add code to force conversion to the default wider integer type before multiplication. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96727 - ICE with character length specified using specification function on assumed-rank array

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96727 - ICE with character length specified using specification function on assumed-rank array. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add missing default error message for the assumed-rank array case. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui 2020-8-20

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96728 - Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96728 - Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. The rank of the argument to specification functions gets written when writing the module file, but, since the value will be negative for assumed-rank

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96726 - ICE with user defined specification function on assumed-rank array

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96726 - ICE with user defined specification function on assumed-rank array. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Obvious fix, replace different operator with less than to avoid infinite loop. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui 2020-8-20 José

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/94110 - Passing an assumed-size to an assumed-shape argument should be rejected

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR94110 - Passing an assumed-size to an assumed-shape argument should be rejected. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add code to also check for deferred-shape and assumed-rank pointer (allocatable arguments are checked elsewhere) dummy arguments being

Re: [Patch, fortran, v2] PR fortran/96728 - Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank

Hi all! Exactly the same thing, only actually including the patch this time. Sorry for the mishap. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui On 20/08/20 19:33, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96728 - Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/95331 - Unlimited polymorphic arrays have wrong bounds

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR95331 - Unlimited polymorphic arrays have wrong bounds. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. When iterating over a class array use the bounds provided by the transformed descriptor (in sym->backend_decl) instead of the original bounds of the array (in the

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/52351, 85868 Wrong array section bounds when passing to an intent-in pointer dummy

Hi all! Proposed patch to PRs 52351, 85868 Wrong array section bounds when passing to an intent-in pointer dummy. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add code to allow for the creation a new descriptor for array sections with the correct one based indexing. Rework the generated

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/94022 - Array slices of assumed-size arrays

Hi All! Proposed patch to Bug 94022 - Array slices of assumed-size arrays. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Make sure that when passing array sections of assumed-size arrays to procedures expecting an assumed-rank array the upper bound of the last dimension of the array section does

[Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi all! Update to a proposed patch to: PR100683 - Array initialization refuses valid due to errors found by Dominique d'Humieres. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add call to simplify expression before parsing *and* check if the expression is still an array after simplification.

PING: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/92621 Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

*PING* Forwarded Message Subject: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/92621 Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:21:25 + From: José Rui Faustino de Sousa To: fort...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi

[Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

Hi all! Update to a proposed patch to: Bug 93308 - bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller Bug 93963 - Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c) Bug 94327 - Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set Bug 94331 - Bind(C) corrupts

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/94104 - Request for diagnostic improvement

Hi all! Proposed patch to: Bug 94104 - Request for diagnostic improvement Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Error message improvement. In Fortran 2008 actual arguments to procedures having a pointer, with intent attribute in, formal argument can also have the target attribute not

PING: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96870 - Class name on error message

*PING* Forwarded Message Subject: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96870 - Class name on error message Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:09:32 + From: José Rui Faustino de Sousa To: fort...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi all! Proposed patch to PR96870 - Class name on error

[Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/100097 PR fortran/100098 - [Unlimited] polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100097 - Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank PR100098 - Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Version 2 no longer re-initializes explicit initialized variables, which

PING: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96724 - Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag -Wconversion-extra

*PING* Forwarded Message Subject: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/96724 - Bogus warnings with the repeat intrinsic and the flag -Wconversion-extra Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:52:10 + From: José Rui Faustino de Sousa To: fort...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi all!

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/101047/101048 Pointer explicit initialization

On 13/06/21 15:46, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: Hi All! Proposed patch to: And again I forgot to add the patch... Sorry for the inconvenience. Best regards, José Rui diff --git a/gcc/fortran/class.c b/gcc/fortran/class.c index 93118ad..5670d18 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/class.c +++

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/101047/101048 Pointer explicit initialization

Hi All! Proposed patch to: Bug 101047 - Pointer explicit initialization fails Bug 101048 - Class pointer explicit initialization refuses valid Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. This patch deals with implementation of explicit initialization for pointer variables. It basically

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100948 - [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

Hi all! Proposed partial patch to: Bug 100948 - [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069 Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Reuse previously calculated full string length to set string section default upper bound. This patch only fixes the ICE the

[Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi all! Update to a proposed patch to: PR100683 - Array initialization refuses valid due to more errors being found... Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add call to simplify expression before parsing *and* check *appropriately* if the expression is still an array after

Re: [Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

Hi Tobias, On 21/06/21 16:46, Tobias Burnus wrote: Well, as said: directly into the compiler where currently the call to libgomp is. > I don't think I understand were you mean. You don't mean the includes in "f95-lang.c" do you? Best regards, José Rui

Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi Tobias, On 21/06/21 12:37, Tobias Burnus wrote: Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review? > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056168.html

Re: [Patch, fortran V2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

On 21/06/21 13:46, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi José, (in principle, I'd like to have the libgfortran function moved to the compiler proper to avoid some issues, but that's admittedly a task independent of your work.) cfi_desc_to_gfc_desc and gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc from ISO_c_binding.c, right?

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types

Hi all! Proposed patch to: Bug 100120 - associated intrinsic failure Bug 100816 - Wrong span on widechar Bug 100818 - A temporary is passed to associated Bug 100819 - Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type Bug 100821 - Deferred character with wrong length

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi all! Proposed patch to: PR100683 - Array initialization refuses valid Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add call to simplify expression before parsing. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix bogus error gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100683

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

Hi all! Proposed patch to: Bug 93308 - bind(c) subroutine changes lower bound of array argument in caller Bug 93963 - Select rank mishandling allocatable and pointer arguments with bind(c) Bug 94327 - Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set Bug 94331 - Bind(C) corrupts array

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi All! And yes I forgot the patch... Sorry... Best regards, José Rui On 19/05/21 17:09, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: Hi all! Proposed patch to: PR100683 - Array initialization refuses valid Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add call to simplify expression before parsing.

[Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/92621 Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

Hi all! Proposed patch to: PR92621 - Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c) Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. The code currently generated tries to deallocate the undefined artificial cfi.n pointer before it is associated with the allocatable

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100245 - ICE on automatic reallocation

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100245 - ICE on automatic reallocation. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add an if clause for handling derived types in the left hand side. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix ICE with automatic reallocation [PR100136]

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/82376 - Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR82376 - Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Evaluate function result and then pass a pointer, instead of a reference to the function itself, thus avoiding multiple evaluations of the function. Thank you very

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100029 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument, PR fortran/100040 - Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100040 - Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable PR100029 - ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Made sure the code also recognized assumed-rank arrays as full arrays.

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100094 - Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100094 - Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Pointers, and allocatables, must carry TKR information even when undefined. The patch adds code to initialize both pointers and allocatables element

Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100097 PR fortran/100098 - [Unlimited] polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100097 - Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank PR100098 - Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Pointers, and allocatables, must carry TKR information even when

Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100103 - Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100103 - Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add select rank temporary associated names as possible targets of automatic reallocation. The patch depends on PR100097 and PR100098. Thank you very much. Best

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100024 PR fortran/100025 ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR100024 & PR100025 - ICE on missing polymorphic argument. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Remove assertion checking for possible assumed rank arrays and added an explicit error message. Change if clause to allow the handling of assumed-rank arrays as

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100018 - ICE on missing polymorphic argument

On 10/04/21 17:37, Tobias Burnus wrote: And you need an additional single-line summary for git – which should be part of the patch submission. Fortran: Fix ICE due to referencing a NULL pointer [PR100018] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/100018 * resolve.c: Add association check

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/84006, PR fortran/100027 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR84006 - [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity PR100027 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add branch to if clause to handle polymorphic objects, not sure if I got all possible

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100018 - ICE on missing polymorphic argument

Hi all! Proposed patch to PR100018 - ICE on missing polymorphic argument. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add association check before de-referencing pointer in order to avoid ICE. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui 2021-4-10 José Rui Faustino de Sousa

Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120 - associated intrinsic failure

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100120 - associated intrinsic failure Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add code to ensure that pointers have the correct dynamic type. The patch depends on PR100097 and PR100098. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix associated

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100132 - Optimization breaks pointer association

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100132 - Optimization breaks pointer association. Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Correct pointer attributes when passing polymorphic pointers. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix function attributes [PR100132]

[Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/84006, PR fortran/100027 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR84006 - [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity PR100027 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add branch to if clause to handle polymorphic objects, not sure if I got all possible

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100136 - ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100136 - ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Add handling for pointer expressions. Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui Fortran: Fix ICE with -fcheck=pointer [PR100136] gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR