).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Remove
pointer propagation special-case.
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimplify.c (gimplify_call_expr): Use saved fnptrtype for
looking at TYPE_ARG_TYPES.
Index: gcc/gimplify.c
===
--- gcc/gimplify.c (revision 210207)
+++ gcc/gimplify.c (working
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (vn_get_expr_for): Valueize operands before
folding the expression.
(valueize_expr): Remove.
(visit_reference_op_load): Do not valueize the result of
vn_get_expr_for.
(simplify_binary_expression
obvious candidate is the alias walker
which doesn't have to consider unreachable paths when
walking into virtual PHIs.
The patch will likely get some more cleanups (due to the hack
in set_ssa_val_to).
Comments still welcome.
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-05-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Boostrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* Makefile.in (GTFILES): Remove tree-ssa-propagate.c.
* tree-ssa-propagate.c: Do not include gt-tree-ssa-propagate.h.
(interesting_ssa_edges
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:45 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in
any of the bits.
I thought it would be
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/02/14 15:56, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/
* coretypes.h (gimple): Drop typedef.
(const_gimple): Likewise.
(gimple_seq): Convert from being a gimple to a gimple_stmt *.
So instead, we just want to
On May 9, 2014 5:53:06 PM CEST, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Fixed a place where the wrong dump file was being used, leading to
an inconsistency and seg fault when dump_file was non-NULL but
cgraph_dump_file was NULL.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
The wide-int version of int_const_binop_1 has:
static tree
int_const_binop_1 (enum tree_code code, const_tree arg1, const_tree parg2,
int overflowable)
{
[...]
tree type = TREE_TYPE
On May 11, 2014 3:54:30 PM CEST, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch plugs a GGC leak in gcse.c, which will hold on to test insn
to save memory. But this results in holding on to entire RTL function
bodies, the function's CFG, and a lot more.
Fix is simple: Clear the
/vect/pr52252-ld.c:7:1:
note: vectorized 0 loops in function.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
--
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
I discovered that the support for the documented -fdump-* options
optimized, missed, note and optall was missing. Added that and
fixed a minor typo in the documentation.
Bootstrapped and tested on
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/25/14 05:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com
wrote:
Please remember to send patches to gcc-patches.
I'm wondering if you couldn't just use std::string here.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1 and get_ref_base_and_extent have similar
code to handle array indices. The code in tree-dfa.c extends from the
precision of the index, as before wide-int, but the tree-dfa.h
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
While testing another patch, I hit cases where Ada was building or
folding additions involving integer_one_node without converting
it to the type of the other operand. This looked unintentional,
since all
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes a bogus warning generated by -Wmaybe-uninitialized.
The problem is that we sometimes fail to acknowledge a defining edge
belonging to a control-dependence chain because we assume that each
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:41 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
basically this patch is unchanged from the last time I sent this series,
except
I reordered the includes in rtl.c to have ggc.h come before vec.h because
vec.h
declares some
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:41 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
This implements finalizers by keeping a list of registered finalizers
and after every mark but before sweeping check to see if any of them are
for unmarked blocks.
This uses the two
As discussed in the PR, tailcall settings have to be cleared by
the inliner.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk
and 4.9 branch.
Richard.
2014-05-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR ipa/60973
* tree-inline.c (remap_gimple_stmt): Clear
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
The gfoo type names are pleasantly terse, though I'm a little unhappy
about how they no longer match the prefix of the accessor functions e.g.
gimple_switch_num_labels (const
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:27 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 15:10 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 12 May 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
The gfoo type names are pleasantly terse
-gnu, ok
if that succeeds (I expect to have to adjust some testcases)?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-05-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
c-family/
* c-gimplify.c (c_gimplify_expr): Gimplify self-modify expressions
using unsigned arithmetic if overflow does not wrap instead
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
As reported in the PR, the lto-plugin may fail to link if the host
compiler defines __GNUC__, but doesn't accept -static-libgcc (like
recent versions of clang do).
The following patch fixes this by explicitly
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Patterns that trigger the optimization and warning can form after inlining,
and it can be rather difficult to figure out what exactly is causing the
warning. The inlining context at least provides additional hints,
This fixes call handling.
Committed to the branch.
Richard.
2014-05-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimple-match-head.c (maybe_push_res_to_seq): Fix res
!= NULL case and add a comment.
(gimple_match_and_simplify): Properly handle virtual
operands when
to the branch.
Richard.
2014-05-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimple-match-head.c (REAL_CST_P): New predicate.
(gimple_match_and_simplify): Support re-simplification of
two-argument builtin functions.
* match.pd: Add pattern simplifying pow (x, 0.5) to sqrt
and uglinesses in the patch,
but this is a state that passes bootstrap and regtest otherwise
and thus ready.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-05-14 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children):
Rewrite to propagate the VN result
+foo (unsigned int x)
+{
+ return ((unsigned long long) x 0x00ffULL) 40;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump return 0; original { target { ilp32 ||
lp64 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump original } } */
Jakub
--
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
SUSE
Status
==
The 4.8 branch is now frozen as I am preparing a first release
candidate for 4.8.3. All patches to the branch now require
explicit approval from release managers.
Previous Report
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-05/msg00026.html
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-14 19:09 GMT+04:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-05-13 23:21 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 05/13/14 02:38, Ilya
This adds a dispatch from fold_stmt (!inplace for now) to
match-and-simplify. Mainly to get more testing coverage.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* gimple-fold.c (fold_stmt_1): Dispatch
For some odd reason I didn't implement this earlier. This is one
major source of 2nd-stage opportunities that come up when running
two adjacent FRE passes.
Bootstrap and regtest ongoing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2014-05-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:42:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
It's not, I'm seeing many
/home/marek/src/gcc/gcc/wide-int.h:1734:7: runtime error: shift
exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
plus I think I remember
)
{
--
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendorffer
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
PR 61085 revealed that I forgot to put a type_preserved check to an
important spot, namely to update_indirect_edges_after_inlining, which
leads to wrong devirtualization because the function does not ignore
jump
On May 16, 2014 4:47:11 AM CEST, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
This reorders the avx checks and gates on a target triplet check before
compiling any code.
Can you explain why?
Ok?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
For some odd reason I didn't implement this earlier. This is one
major source of 2nd-stage opportunities that come up when running
two adjacent FRE passes.
Bootstrap and regtest ongoing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
The following is what I have
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
Ok, not really predicate aware, but this makes value-numbering
pessimistically handle non-executable edges. In the following
patch groundwork is laid and PHI value-numbering is adjusted
to take advantage of edges known to be not executable
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@arm.com wrote:
Ping?
Sorry ...
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
Sent: Friday, May
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi,
On 15 May 2014, at 09:26, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
Targets like ARM and AARCH64 support double-word load store instructions,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Hi, debugging runtime bugs due to devirtualization can be hard for
very large C++ programs with complicated class hierarchy. This patch
adds the support to report this high level transformation via
-fopt-info (not
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 16, 2014, at 3:48 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@arm.com wrote:
Ping?
Sorry ...
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 16, 2014, at 3:48 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho
This fixes the non-regression testcase from PR61194 by also
recognizing COND_EXPRs as sink for bool expressions in vectorizer
pattern detection.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-16 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 11:16 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:58 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:46 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/10/14 13:22, David Malcolm
On May 16, 2014 7:07:11 PM CEST, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/16/14 02:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Quiet as usual.
Which strongly suggests folks trust you to do the right thing here :-)
I think the FRE/PRE reference in $SUBJECT made me ignore the patch
entirely -- my brain hurts when
On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com
PR libgcc/60166
* sysdeps/arm/soft-fp/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_S, _FP_NANFRAC_D)
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On May 15, 2014, at 11:52 PM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 16, 2014 4:47:11 AM CEST, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
This reorders the avx checks and gates on a target triplet check
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch makes also the rtti type info for A in the testcase:
struct A
{
virtual void foo(void) {};
virtual void foo2(void) {};
virtual void foo3(void) {};
virtual void foo4(void) {};
virtual void
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 14:59 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 11:16 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:58
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
The main thing keeping zero-precision wide-ints alive was void_zero_node,
a tree used in the C and C++ frontends that has type VOID_TYPE but code
INTEGER_CST.
Richard B. asked me to replace the INTEGER_CST
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this patch enables -fdeclone-ctor-dtor by default: I believe it is up to the
optimizers to decide when the actual worker body should be inlined into the
thunks.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
Please make sure
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Modified the patch according to yours and Richard's feedback. PTAL.
ENOPATCH.
Btw, I don't see any issue with leaking node order to opt-report.
Richard.
thanks,
David
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Jan
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Sandra,
This patch seems quite similar in purpose to the
remove_local_statics optimization that Mentor has proposed, although
the implementation is quite different. Here is the last version of
our patch, prepared by Bernd
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
this fixes an over-optimization of the GIMPLE optimizer, whereby two otherwise
identical calls to a pure function present in different EH regions are CSEd,
which changes the semantics of the program because the
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
The main thing keeping zero-precision wide-ints alive was void_zero_node
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@arm.com wrote:
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Oh, and what happens for
unsigned foo (unsigned char *x)
{
return x[0] 24 | x[2] 8 | x[3];
}
? We could do an unsigned int load from x
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/14/14 03:06, Richard Biener wrote:
The following fixes pre/post-inc/dec gimplification of promoted
integer types. There is the issue with the way TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED
is related to TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS and the (non-)semantics of
-fno
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2014
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Please keep the redundant test, it speeds up comparison on hash
collisions. As you are on it I'd use size_int (lr).
The redundant test is very redundant, see the line just below it.
Oh... ok ;)
I think it's ok to
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
I thought we had decided a long time ago that pure and const functions could
not throw and that was the documented behavior.
No, it's precisely the opposite.
Btw, I agree. For this and other attributes the behavior
The following is my current idea on progressing on the HOST_WIDE_INT
removal
1) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00381.html (ping)
2) make sure [u]int64_t is available and use that to define HOST_WIDE_INT
3) s/HOST_WIDE_INT/int64_t/ (same for unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)
Leaves us
This fixes PR61209, we were leaking VN_TOP into the cached
expr used for folding. That's of course a no-no.
Bootstrap and regtest ongoing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2014-05-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/61209
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/61221
* tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children):
Do nothing for unreachable blocks.
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (cond_dom_walker::before_dom_children):
Improve unreachability detection
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
This removes the need_64bit_hwi logic, nothing else (well, brings
libcpp in line with gcc).
Bootstrap / regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
Just as I
On May 19, 2014 6:57:52 PM CEST, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/19/14 06:54, Richard Biener wrote:
In this PR we run into the issue that releasing SSA names from
FRE/PRE elimination corrupts the VN lattice and thus the VN lookup
we perform for removing redudnant stores ICEs. The patch
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
Ian,
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, Maciej W. Rozycki
ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On May 19, 2014 6:57:52 PM CEST, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/19/14 06:54, Richard Biener wrote:
In this PR we run into the issue that releasing SSA names from
FRE/PRE elimination corrupts the VN lattice and thus the VN lookup
we
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@arm.com wrote:
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Agreed, but I am happy with doing that as a followup. Btw,
a very simple one would be to reject unaligned
SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (TYPE_MODE (load_type
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 05/18/2014 08:45 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 05/18/2014 02:59 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
For cases like local-statics-7 your approach can be saved by adding
simple IPA analysis
to look for static vars that are used only by
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The following is my current idea on progressing on the HOST_WIDE_INT
removal
1) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00381.html (ping)
2) make sure [u]int64_t is available and use that to define HOST_WIDE_INT
3)
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Same as for going C++.
Not to the same extent, this will be worse because done en masse throughout
the code instead of gradually.
Like the gimple - gimple * change pending or the various
gimple - gswitch,glabel,etc. stuff? It's on a similar scale
with an else if, so if you do -fdump-ipa-cgraph
then suddenly -fopt-info will stop reporting? At least in the cgraphunit.c
part of the patch.
I'm ok with the rest of the patch.
Thanks,
Richard.
David
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 16
We can't really code-generate those (and thus such patterns are
simply skipped during code-gen ...). Reject them early.
Committed to the branch.
Richard.
2014-05-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* genmatch.c (parse_match_and_simplify): Reject outermost
expressions
This adds $subject.
Committed to branch.
Richard.
2014-05-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* genmatch.c (error_cb, fatal_at): New functions.
(expect, parse_expr, parse_op, parse_match_and_simplify,
main): Provide error locations.
Index: gcc/genmatch.c
This makes the dumps easier to follow.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (process_scc): Dump SCC here, when
iterating,
(extract_and_process_scc_for_name): not here
On May 20, 2014 6:47:44 PM CEST, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/20/14 02:06, Richard Biener wrote:
We're still going to have problems if SSA names are re-used
(as even released SSA names have to remain valid lattice
entries after this). But currently nothing will create new
SSA names
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
PR 61208 is a wrong code bug in Thumb2 where we can generate out of
range branches due to incorrect instruction size calculations. It's
mostly gone latent on 4.9 and trunk (though could still happen at -O0
where splitting is done during final
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 21 May 2014 09:28, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2014 18:37, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi James
Thank you for pointing this out. In the new patch I removed the
modification of vqdmulh_n_s32 and
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Sandra Loosemore
san...@codesourcery.com wrote:
One of the consequences of the (now-fixed) bug in PR60179 is that Nios II
code using target pragmas to specify custom instructions failed to generate
those instructions with -flto. We came up with this test case
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
Bug # 61144 is a regression in 4.9.0 that breaks building of musl libc
due to aggressive and semantically-incorrect constant folding of weak
aliases. The attached patch seems to fix the issue. A weak alias
should never be a
that specifies that the
object can no longer accessed via the pointer argument q
(at least if p didn't return NULL and size was not NULL).
The C99 standard explicitely mentions that p may have
the same pointer value as q though.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-05-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
PR56955 prompted me to handle BUILT_IN_REALLOC just the same
way we already handle BUILT_IN_STR[N]DUP.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Now this will disambiguate *p and *q for p = realloc (q, n)
for any value of n
on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to branch.
Note this makes a few cases of the match-1.c and match-2.c
testcases fail because operands are swapped and we only have
one variant of commutative patterns (yeah, points to we need
a solution for that).
Richard.
2014-05-21 Richard Biener rguent
Committed.
Richard.
2014-05-21 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* doc/invoke.texi (-flto-partition=): Document one and
none algorithms.
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 210694
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
this demonstrates how results of ipa-prop escape analysis from
previous patches can be used at a later stage of compilation by
directly returning them from gimple_call_arg_flags which currently
relies on fnspec
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
This is only one of several cases in the PR, but one that's simple
enough for me to write a test for and fix.
Tested x86_64-linux, OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu wrote:
Attached is a proposed documentation patch for __attribute__ ((malloc)),
taken from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955#c9
Richard Biener suggested that I forward it to this list.
Thanks Paul. Re-reading
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
one of the transformations performed by associate_plusminus is:
/* Second match patterns that allow contracting a plus-minus pair
irrespective of overflow issues.
[...]
(T)(P + A) - (T)P -
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
PR56955 prompted me to handle BUILT_IN_REALLOC just the same
way we already handle BUILT_IN_STR[N]DUP.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Now this will disambiguate *p
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Thomas Preud'homme
thomas.preudho...@arm.com wrote:
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
I'll send the new patch as soon as all the tests are done.
Here you are. I also simplified the tests a bit having the reference as a
function
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This is a change from the gomp4 branch which I think could go on trunk now.
It removes some duplicated definitions and puts them in a header file. More
definitions will be added to that header once offloading is
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:27:32PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
this demonstrates how results of ipa-prop escape analysis from
previous
On May 22, 2014 5:24:33 PM CEST, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Can we? If the body is not readily available we only have decl and
cgraph-node, not struct function.
I suppose we could exchange the struct function pointer in
tree_function_decl for a cgraph_node pointer and put
the
The following reverts the un-XFAILing and adjusts the testcase
according to reality (as already noted in testcase comments).
Committed.
Richard.
2014-05-23 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR testsuite/61266
* gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c: Revert un-XFAILing
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
If a loop's header count is less than iteration count, the iteration
estimation is apparently incorrect for this loop. Thus disable
unrolling of such loops.
Testing on going. OK for trunk if test pass?
No. Why don't you
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The patch fixes PR rtl-optimization/61278. Root cause for issue is
that df_live does not exist at -O1.
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
OK for trunk?
Why do you need to give up? It seems
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
It won't be so easy, because struct function is really built at
relatively convoluted
places within frontend before cgraph node is assigned to them (I tried
that few years
back).
Well, just call cgraph create node from
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Paul Eggert egg...@cs.ucla.edu wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
Can you try to clarify the wording (I'm not a native speaker).
Sure. I've filed a clarified version on PR 56955 and am attaching it here
for convenience.
Thanks, installed.
Richard.
901 - 1000 of 25072 matches
Mail list logo
