Re: No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'. [PR106472]

2024-03-28 Thread Дилян Палаузов
? Kind regards Дилян Am 26. März 2024 16:37:40 UTC schrieb Ian Lance Taylor : >On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:33 AM Дилян Палаузов > wrote: >> >> Makefile.def contains already: >> >> host_modules= { module= libbacktrace; bootstrap=true; }; // since eff02e4f84 >> - &quo

Re: No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'. [PR106472]

2024-03-26 Thread Дилян Палаузов
ян Am 25. März 2024 23:59:52 UTC schrieb Ian Lance Taylor : >On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 4:32 AM Дилян Палаузов > wrote: >> >> Can the build experts say what needs to be changed? The dependencies I >> added are missing in the build configuration (@if gcc-bootstrap). >>

Re: No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'. [PR106472]

2024-03-23 Thread Дилян Палаузов
with a comment, indicating the quality of the patch. The change proposed by me does fix PR106472. Kind regards Дилян -Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek To: Дилян Палаузов , Paolo Bonzini , Nathanael Nerode , Alexandre Oliva , Ralf Wildenhues , Ian Lance

No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'. [PR106472]

2024-03-13 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Non-parallel build can fail, depending on the ./configure parameters - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 . The change below does fix the problem. I do not understand the build system to say, that this is the best approach, so if there are questions I might or might not be

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-17 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Hello Segher, On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 13:09 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 04:59:40PM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > My point is to reorgnize the approach in such a way, that sending reminders > > gets irrelevant (has no impact) and > > th

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-17 Thread Дилян Палаузов
is given to submitters who send reminders, irrespective of the properties a patch has. Regards Дилян On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 10:22 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:16:27PM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > Hello Segher, > > > > my question w

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-11 Thread Дилян Палаузов
for sending reminders, is a good idea. This saves time of people to write reminders. Greetings Дилян On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 07:57 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:44:31PM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > -- at https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/contribute.html i

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-11 Thread Дилян Палаузов
ted over website over a mailing list. Regards Дилян On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 14:56 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi Dilyan, > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 02:45:02PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > Do you share the opinion, that whatever can be done after receiving a > > remin

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-10 Thread Дилян Палаузов
:55:11AM +0000, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogrammed to send automatically weekly > > reminders on all patches, that are not integrated yet? > > No, that will not help. > > If an interested party sends a friendly ping, that is of course wel

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2019-02-05 Thread Дилян Палаузов
. Regards Дилян On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 10:55 +, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > Hello, > > will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogrammed to send automatically weekly > reminders on all patches, that are not integrated yet? > > Will lt help, if I hire myself to integrate the patch, or sha

Substitute all "the the" with "the"

2019-01-09 Thread Дилян Палаузов
… by applying sed -i "s/the the/the/" `git grep -l "the the"`

+reminder+ Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2018-12-21 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Hello, what shall happen, so that no reminders are necessary to move things forward? Why does sending a reminder make a difference and are only penetrant persons blessed? Regards Дилян On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 10:55 +, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > Hello, > > will it help, if

Re: Make clear, when contributions will be ignored

2018-12-07 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Hello, will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogrammed to send automatically weekly reminders on all patches, that are not integrated yet? Will lt help, if I hire myself to integrate the patch, or shall I rather hire somebody to send reminders? If something can be done after sending a reminder, then

Make claer, when contributions will be ignored

2018-12-04 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Hello, on 27th October I sent to gcc-patches a mail with the subject “Don’t build gdb/readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system-readline is supplied” and on 14th November I sent a reminder. I got no answer. Before sending the emails I filled a bugzilla ticket. Can you please make it clear,

+reminder+ Don’t build gdb/readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system-readline is supplied

2018-11-14 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Forwarded Message From: Дилян Палаузов To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Don’t build gdb/readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system- readline is supplied Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:53:44 + Building GDB always builds the bundled libreadline.a, even if use

Don’t build gdb/readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system-readline is supplied

2018-10-27 Thread Дилян Палаузов
Building GDB always builds the bundles libreadline.a, even if use of the libreadline installed on the system was requested with --with- system-readline. The change below is for binutils-gdb’s/configure.ac, which is maintained by gcc. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87741 [GCC]