Hi Richard,
On 07/12/2018 05:35 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 11/07/18 17:48, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi Sudi,
On 07/10/2018 02:29 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote:
Hi Jackson
On Tuesday 10 July 2018 09:37 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch resolves PR86014. It does so
Hi Sudi,
On 07/10/2018 02:29 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote:
Hi Jackson
On Tuesday 10 July 2018 09:37 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch resolves PR86014. It does so by noticing that the last
load may clobber the address register without issue (regardless of
where it exists
Hi Sudi,
Thanks for the review.
On 07/10/2018 10:56 AM, Sudakshina wrote:
Hi Jackson
- if (!MEM_P (mem_1) || aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem_1, mode))
+ if (!MEM_P (mem[1]) || aarch64_mem_pair_operand (mem[1], mode))
mem_1 == mem[1]?
Oops, yes... That should be mem[0].
return
Hi Kyrill,
On 07/10/2018 10:55 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Jackson,
On 10/07/18 09:37, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch removes some duplicated code. Since this method deals with
four loads or stores, there is a lot of duplicated code that can easily
be replaced with smaller
/aarch64/ldp_stp_10.c) now passes.
Bootstrap and regtest OK.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
Changelog:
gcc/
2018-06-25 Jackson Woodruff
PR target/86014
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_operands_adjust_ok_for_ldpstp):
Remove address clobber check on last register.
diff
Hi all,
This patch removes some duplicated code. Since this method deals with
four loads or stores, there is a lot of duplicated code that can easily
be replaced with smaller loops.
Regtest and bootstrap OK.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Jackson
Changelog:
gcc/
2018-06-28 Jackson Woodruff
Add myself to write after approval in MAINTAINERS.
Committed as r262216.
Jackson
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 262215)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2018-06-28 Jackson Woodruff
of
loads/stores that are valid, and extending the range that the LDP/STP
addresses can reach.
This patch is based on
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00741.html
OK for trunk?
Jackson
ChangeLog:
gcc/
2017-08-09 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* aar
Hi,
I have addressed the issues you raised below.
Is the amended patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Jackson.
On 09/12/2017 05:28 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:02:52AM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
I've attached a new patch that addresses some of the issues
On 09/13/2017 04:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
been moved out of fold-const.c
It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
(A / C1) +- (A / C2
ChangeLog:
gcc/testsuite
2017-09-13 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62178.c: Updated testcase
to scan for two ldrs and an mla.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr62178.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr62178.c
Hi,
Since I rebased the patch that this is based on, I have also rebased
this patch.
Jackson.
On 09/12/2017 07:15 PM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch removes a lot of duplicated code in aarch64-ldpstp.md.
The patterns that did not previously generate a base register now
do
On 09/12/2017 07:32 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for doing this, looks good to me FWIW. I was just wondering:
Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@foss.arm.com> writes:
@@ -14712,6 +14712,11 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx *operands, bool
load,
if (!rtx_equal_p (
On 09/12/2017 11:43 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have
been moved out of fold-const.c
It also removes an (almost entirely) redundant pattern:
(A / C1) +- (A / C2) -> A *
it.
Bootstrap and regtest OK on AArch64.
OK for trunk?
Jackson.
gcc/
2017-09-07 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64-ldpstp.md: Replace uses of
aarch64_mem_pair_operand with memory_operand and delete
operand swappin
single store pair instruction rather than two `str`
instructions.
Bootstrap and testsuite run OK. OK for trunk?
Jackson
gcc/
2017-07-21 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md: New patterns to generate stp
and ldp.
* config/aarch64
Hi all,
A minor improvement came to mind while updating other parts of this patch.
I've updated a testcase to make it more clear and a condition now uses a
call to is_division_by rather than manually checking those conditions.
Jackson
On 08/30/2017 05:32 PM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all
On 08/30/2017 01:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Jackson Woodruff
<jackson.woodr...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
On 08/29/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jackson Woodruff
<jackson.woodr...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all
required funsafe-math-optimizations.
To adjust for this case, the testcase has been updated to require O1 so
that the optimization is still performed.
This pattern is moved verbatim into match.pd:
(A / C) +- (B / C) -> (A +- B) / C.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
gcc/
2017-08-30 Jack
te_address_p with strict_p set to
false and uses DImode for the mode to pass.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
Wilco
ChangeLog:
gcc/
2017-08-29 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/constraints.md (Umq): New constraint.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.m
, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Jackson Woodruff
<jackson.woodr...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all,
The patch implements the some of the division optimizations discussed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 .
We now reassociate (as discussed in the bug report):
x / (y * y) -> x
On 08/29/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jackson Woodruff
<jackson.woodr...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies again to those CC'ed, who (again) received this twice.
Joseph: Yes you are correct. I misread the original thread, now fixed.
Richard
Hi all,
Apologies again to those CC'ed, who (again) received this twice.
Joseph: Yes you are correct. I misread the original thread, now fixed.
Richard: I've moved the optimizations out of fold-const.c. One has been
replicated in match.pd, and the other (x / C +- y / C -> (x +- y) / C)
I've
Hi Richard,
I have changed the condition as you suggest below. OK for trunk?
Jackson.
On 08/11/2017 02:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 10/08/17 14:12, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch changes patterns in aarch64-simd.md to replace
moviv0.4s, 0
strq0
ath-optimizations.
Bootstrapped and regtested with part (1/2). OK for trunk?
Jackson
gcc/
2017-08-03 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
PR 71026/tree-optimization
* tree-ssa-math-opts (is_division_by_square,
is_square_of, insert_sqaure_reciproc
And have now attached that patch.
Jackson
On 08/10/2017 03:09 PM, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
The patch implements the division opitmizations discussed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 .
The implemented change differs slightly from the
proposed one in that we re
his twice,
I accidentally sent this from an email gcc-patches doesn't accept)
Jackson
gcc/
2017-08-03 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
PR 71026/tree-optimization
* match.pd: New patterns.
gcc/testsuite
2017-08-03 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
and regtested on aarch64 with no regressions.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
gcc/
2017-08-09 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* aarch64-simd.md (mov): No longer force zero
immediate into register.
(*aarch64_simd_mov): Add new case for stp
using zero imm
for a multiply followed by a
subtract of vectors with an integer operand on the multiply. Also add
testcases for this.
Bootstrap and testsuite run on aarch64. OK for trunk?
Jackson
Changelog entry:
gcc/
2017-06-06 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodr...@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/a
Hi James,
I have addressed the issues below.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
On 07/13/2017 05:14 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:35:55PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi James,
I've addressed the issues discussed below.
OK for trunk?
I one last comment, otherwise, this looks
Hi James,
I've addressed the issues discussed below.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
On 07/13/2017 10:03 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch refactors comments in config/aarch64/aarch64.c
aarch64_print_operand
to provide
Hi all,
This patch refactors comments in config/aarch64/aarch64.c
aarch64_print_operand
to provide a table of aarch64 specific formating options.
I've tested the patch with a bootstrap and testsuite run on aarch64.
OK for trunk?
Changelog:
gcc/
2017-07-04 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.wo
32 matches
Mail list logo
