BUMP: AW: [PATCH] Microblaze: Type confusion in fprintf

2019-10-04 Thread Jonas Pfeil
. September 2019 02:52 An: Jeff Law Cc: Jonas Pfeil ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Microblaze: Type confusion in fprintf On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:50:12PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 9/12/19 7:33 AM, Jonas Pfeil wrote: > > A type confusion leads to illegal (and nonsensical) as

[PATCH] Microblaze: Type confusion in fprintf

2019-09-12 Thread Jonas Pfeil
A type confusion leads to illegal (and nonsensical) assembly on certain host architectures (e.g. ARM), where HOST_WIDE_INT (64 bit) and unsigned long (32 bit) have different alignments. So this has printed an uninitialized register instead of the intended value. This fixes float constant initializa

AW: Fix for type confusion bug on microblaze

2019-09-12 Thread Jonas Pfeil
"\t.ascii\t" #define STRING_ASM_OP "\t.asciz\t" -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Law Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. September 2019 19:33 An: Jonas Pfeil ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Betreff: Re: Fix for type confusion bug on microblaze On 9/11/19 5:28 AM, Jonas Pfei

Fix for type confusion bug on microblaze

2019-09-11 Thread Jonas Pfeil
The Microblaze target confuses unsigned long with HOST_WIDE_INT. This works fine for many architectures, but fails on ARM (HOST_WIDE_INT is 8 bytes, unsigned long is 4 bytes). Leading to print a uninitialized register instead of the desired number, fix by using the correct printf-specifier. Teste