New optimization flags and new params need documentation in
gcc/doc/invoke.texi.
Thanks. Added description in invoke.texi. The patch is in trunk.
The description of the --params suggest they provide fixed values - is
there no way to autodetect sensible values with a cost-model? I
hardly
, black_box);
PBB_TRANSFORMED (pbb) = NULL;
2014-11-12 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
* common.opt (flag_loop_unroll_and_jam): New flag for unroll and jam.
* params.def (PARAM_LOOP_UNROLL_JAM_SIZE)
(PARAM_LOOP_UNROLL_JAM_DEPTH): Parameters for unroll and jam flag
...@kotnet.org
To: Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es, Richard
Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com,
Albert Cohen albert.co...@inria.fr
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:24:40 AM
Subject: Re: [GRAPHITE, PATCH] Loop unroll
options.
Mircea
2014-11-12 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
* common.opt (flag_loop_unroll_and_jam): New flag for unroll and jam.
* params.def (PARAM_LOOP_UNROLL_JAM_SIZE)
(PARAM_LOOP_UNROLL_JAM_DEPTH): Parameters for unroll and jam flag.
* graphite
of unrolled loop for unroll-and-jam,
+ 2, 0, 0)
+
+
/* Maximal number of parameters that we allow in a SCoP. */
DEFPARAM (PARAM_GRAPHITE_MAX_NB_SCOP_PARAMS,
2014-11-11 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
* common.opt (flag_loop_unroll_and_jam): New flag for unroll and jam
)
don't succeed to remove the ifs from the loops and generate two loop
structures (this would
have been highly desirable).
As the stage 1 is going to close soon, quick feedback to this patch is
greatly appreciated.
Many thanks, Mircea Namolaru
int
f1(int v[1024][1024], int HEIGHT, int LENGTH
loop structures
(this would
have been highly desirable).
As the stage 1 is going to close soon, quick feedback to this patch is greatly
appreciated.
Many thanks, Mircea Namolaru
2014-11-7 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
* common.opt (flag_loop_unroll_jam): New flag
On 08/03/14 17:44, Mircea Namolaru wrote:
2014-08-03 Mircea Namolarumircea.namol...@inria.fr
Replacement of isl-int by isl_val
* graphite-clast-to-gimple.c: include isl/val.h, isl/val_gmp.h
(compute_bounds_for_param): use isl_val instead of isl_int
= isl_set_add_constraint (scop-context, c);
2014-08-03 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
Replacement of isl-int by isl_val
* graphite-clast-to-gimple.c: include isl/val.h, isl/val_gmp.h
(compute_bounds_for_param): use isl_val instead of isl_int
);
+ isl_val_get_num_gmp (isl_value, up);
+ isl_val_free (isl_value);
isl_set_free (domain);
isl_aff_free (dimension);
}
2014-07-06 Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
Replacement of isl-int by isl_val
* graphite-clast-to-gimple.c: include isl/val.h, isl/val_gmp.h
in the future so you don't want to base the correctness of
the code on this assumption.
Mircea
- Original Message -
From: Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es, mircea namolaru
mircea.namol...@inria.fr
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 5
Hi,
Your patch is fine - even without this bug, introducing NULL pointer checks
before dereferencing a pointer is a good thing.
Mircea
Hi,
Thanks. Here is the updated patch.
2014-02-26 Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es
Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/58028
* graphite-clast-to-gimple.c (set_cloog_options): Don't remove scalar
dimensions.
Index: gcc/graphite
Thanks for comments - updated the patch (fixed my e-mail address too :-)).
2014-02-26 Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es
Mircea Namolaru mircea.namol...@inria.fr
Fix for bug 58028
* graphite-clast-to-gimple.c (set_cloog_options):
Don't remove scalar dimensions
14 matches
Mail list logo
