Re: Display priority in "Serious" bugs for gcc 8 from web page

[Richard Sandiford]

Thomas Koenig  writes:
> Hello world,
>
> whenever I look at the list of serious bugs, I find myself chaning the
> columns to add the priority field.
>
> What do you think about adding the priority field when clicking on that
> link?  A patch is attached.

I don't think anyone replied to this so far, but +1 FWIW.  It seemed
strange that the priority was one of the main search criteria but wasn't
included in the results.

The "Resolution" field seems a bit redundant when the search is only
for open bugs, so if people are worried about having too many columns,
maybe it would be OK to do a swap?

Thanks,
Richard

Display priority in "Serious" bugs for gcc 8 from web page

[Thomas Koenig]

Hello world,

whenever I look at the list of serious bugs, I find myself chaning the
columns to add the priority field.

What do you think about adding the priority field when clicking on that
link?  A patch is attached.

Regards

Thomas
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1080
diff -u -r1.1080 index.html
--- index.html	2 Apr 2018 15:22:36 -	1.1080
+++ index.html	14 Apr 2018 14:00:29 -
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
   href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=regexpshort_desc=%5C[([ 0-9.%2F]*[ %2F])*8[ %2F][ 0-9.%2F]*[Rr]egression *%5C]target_milestone=6.5target_milestone=7.4target_milestone=8.0known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstrknown_to_work_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc=bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstrbug_file_loc=gcchost_type=allwordssubstrgcchost=gcctarget_type=allwordssubstrgcctarget=gccbuild_type=allwordssubstrgccbuild=keywords_type=allwordskeywords=bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=SUSPENDEDbug_status=WAITINGbug_status=REOPENEDpriority=P1priority=P2priority=P3emailtype1=substringemail1=emailtype2=substringemail2=bugidtype=includebug_id=votes=chfieldfrom=chfieldto=Nowchfieldvalue=cmdtype=doitorder=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+timefield0-0-0=nooptype0-0-0=noopvalue0-0-0=">Serious
   regressions.
   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=regexpshort_desc=%5C[([ 0-9.%2F]*[ %2F])*8[ %2F][ 0-9.%2F]*[Rr]egression *%5C]target_milestone=6.5target_milestone=7.4target_milestone=8.0known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstrknown_to_work_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc=bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstrbug_file_loc=gcchost_type=allwordssubstrgcchost=gcctarget_type=allwordssubstrgcctarget=gccbuild_type=allwordssubstrgccbuild=keywords_type=allwordskeywords=bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=SUSPENDEDbug_status=WAITINGbug_status=REOPENEDemailtype1=substringemail1=emailtype2=substringemail2=bugidtype=includebug_id=votes=chfieldfrom=chfieldto=Nowchfieldvalue=cmdtype=doitorder=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+timefield0-0-0=nooptype0-0-0=noopvalue0-0-0=">All
+  href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=regexpshort_desc=%5C[([ 0-9.%2F]*[ %2F])*8[ %2F][ 0-9.%2F]*[Rr]egression *%5C]target_milestone=6.5target_milestone=7.4target_milestone=8.0known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstrknown_to_work_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc=bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstrbug_file_loc=gcchost_type=allwordssubstrgcchost=gcctarget_type=allwordssubstrgcctarget=gccbuild_type=allwordssubstrgccbuild=keywords_type=allwordskeywords=bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=SUSPENDEDbug_status=WAITINGbug_status=REOPENEDemailtype1=substringemail1=emailtype2=substringemail2=bugidtype=includebug_id=votes=chfieldfrom=chfieldto=Nowchfieldvalue=cmdtype=doitorder=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+timefield0-0-0=nooptype0-0-0=noopvalue0-0-0=columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cpriority%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate">All
   regressions.