On 17/10/16 14:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We are incorrectly requiring unique_ptr deleters to be copyable here:
explicit
unique_ptr(pointer __p) noexcept
: _M_t(__p, deleter_type())
{ }
We could just do:
explicit
unique_ptr(pointer __p) noexcept
: _M_t()
On 10/18/2016 12:54 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'll wait a bit longer for any objections, as the refactoring could be
> seen as unnecessary churn, but I think it's valuable housekeeping.
Having stared at std::unique_ptr a lot recently, I like this, FWIW.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 17/10/16 14:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We are incorrectly requiring unique_ptr deleters to be copyable here:
explicit
unique_ptr(pointer __p) noexcept
: _M_t(__p, deleter_type())
{ }
We could just do:
explicit
unique_ptr(pointer __p) noexcept
: _M_t()
