On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I'll still need to do proper testing and benchmarking, but I thought
I'd post the patch anyway just as a heads-up ...
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
I'll still need to do proper testing and benchmarking, but I thought
I'd post the patch anyway just as a heads-up ...
Does this look reasonable to you?
Yes, that looks reasonable. Though
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
we've noticed that the loop optimizer sometimes inserts weirdly
inefficient code to compute the value of an induction
