On December 18, 2017 5:06:25 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 12/18/2017 03:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On December 15, 2017 5:19:14 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
>wrote:
On 12/18/2017 03:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On December 15, 2017 5:19:14 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> I hate this patch.
>>>
>>> The fundamental problem we have is that there are
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On December 15, 2017 5:19:14 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>>I hate this patch.
>>
>>The fundamental problem we have is that there are times when we very
>>much want to thread jumps and yet
On 12/15/2017 09:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:19:14AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> + /* Loop parallelization can be confused by the result of
>> + threading through the loop exit test back into the loop.
>> + However, theading those jumps seems to help
On December 15, 2017 5:19:14 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>I hate this patch.
>
>The fundamental problem we have is that there are times when we very
>much want to thread jumps and yet there are other times when we do not.
>
>To date we have been able to largely select between
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:19:14AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> + /* Loop parallelization can be confused by the result of
> + threading through the loop exit test back into the loop.
> + However, theading those jumps seems to help other codes.
> +
> + I have been