On 06/16/2015 02:52 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Most of ggc_cache_hasher is duplicated from ggc_hasher. This patch
gets the same functionality via inheritance. It also brings the
ggc_hasher functions in line with ggc_cache_hasher by making remove()
and ggc_mx() take references rather than
Most of ggc_cache_hasher is duplicated from ggc_hasher. This patch
gets the same functionality via inheritance. It also brings the
ggc_hasher functions in line with ggc_cache_hasher by making remove()
and ggc_mx() take references rather than pointers. This seems more
consistent with the idea
