Ayal Zaks ayal.z...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Ayal Zaks ayal.z...@gmail.com writes:
Only request is to document that the register moves are
placed/assigned-id's in a specific order.
I suppose this is the downside
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Ayal Zaks ayal.z...@gmail.com writes:
Only request is to document that the register moves are
placed/assigned-id's in a specific order.
I suppose this is the downside of splitting the patches up, sorry,
but
Ayal Zaks ayal.z...@gmail.com writes:
Only request is to document that the register moves are
placed/assigned-id's in a specific order.
I suppose this is the downside of splitting the patches up, sorry,
but the ids are only ordered for the throw-away loop:
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE
Ayal Zaks ayal.z...@gmail.com writes:
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote on 30/08/2011
03:10:50 PM:
From: Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Ayal Zaks/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date: 30/08/2011 03:10 PM
Subject: [3/4] SMS: Record moves
/4] SMS: Record moves in the partial schedule
This patch adds infrastructure that will be used by the final patch.
Specifically:
- it splits the generation of register moves into two:
schedule_reg_moves
records moves in the partial schedule, while apply_reg_moves makes
Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote on 30/08/2011
03:10:50 PM:
From: Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@linaro.org
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Ayal Zaks/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date: 30/08/2011 03:10 PM
Subject: [3/4] SMS: Record moves in the partial schedule
This patch adds
This patch adds infrastructure that will be used by the final patch.
Specifically:
- it splits the generation of register moves into two: schedule_reg_moves
records moves in the partial schedule, while apply_reg_moves makes the
register substitutions.
This patch doesn't actually
