Hi
just rediffed and retested on x86_64-linux the new version of the patch.
Is it Ok for mainline?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
2012-03-06 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/52422
* cp-tree.h (build_addr_func, decay_conversion,
Hi,
On 02/29/2012 06:53 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the
usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux.
When fixing these things, please add checking for error_mark_node
return as well. For instance, in this patch the calls to
Hi,
Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the
usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
PS: while working on the patch, I noticed that a few functions, which in
the meanwhile acquired a tsubst_flags_t parameter, aren't fully
propagating it,
On 02/29/2012 06:53 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the
usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux.
When fixing these things, please add checking for error_mark_node return
as well. For instance, in this patch the calls to