[Patch PING] Re: [4.8, C++ Patch] PR 52422

2012-03-06 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi just rediffed and retested on x86_64-linux the new version of the patch. Is it Ok for mainline? Thanks, Paolo. /// /cp 2012-03-06 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com PR c++/52422 * cp-tree.h (build_addr_func, decay_conversion,

Re: [4.8, C++ Patch] PR 52422

2012-03-01 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 02/29/2012 06:53 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux. When fixing these things, please add checking for error_mark_node return as well. For instance, in this patch the calls to

[4.8, C++ Patch] PR 52422

2012-02-29 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux. Thanks, Paolo. PS: while working on the patch, I noticed that a few functions, which in the meanwhile acquired a tsubst_flags_t parameter, aren't fully propagating it,

Re: [4.8, C++ Patch] PR 52422

2012-02-29 Thread Jason Merrill
On 02/29/2012 06:53 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: Daniel noticed a couple other SFINAE issues, which I'm fixing in the usual straightforward way. Tested x86_64-linux. When fixing these things, please add checking for error_mark_node return as well. For instance, in this patch the calls to