On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:58:40AM +, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> This patch has to be backported to gcc-7 branch as the build error for
> 521.wrf with LTO is there too (for the same reason). This patch has
> been on trunk for some time now. So, is this OK to backport this
Hi James,
This patch has to be backported to gcc-7 branch as the build error for
521.wrf with LTO is there too (for the same reason). This patch has
been on trunk for some time now. So, is this OK to backport this
patch gcc-7 branch?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 30 August 2017 at 15:19, Kugan
Hi James,
On 29 August 2017 at 21:31, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:20:02AM +1000, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
>> workaround to get kernel building with when
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:20:02AM +1000, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
> workaround to get kernel building with when TARGET_FIX_ERR_A53_843419
> is enabled.
>
> This was added to support building kernel loadable modules. In
ping^3
Thanks,
Kugan
On 11 August 2017 at 16:09, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
> Ping^2?
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> On 21 July 2017 at 20:12, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
>> Ping ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kugan
>>
>> On 27 June
On 11 August 2017 at 13:50, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Kugan wrote:
>> Ping^2?
>
> Could you make sure to either include the patch or provide a link to it?
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01967.html)
>
> I think the patch is fine since avoiding adrp/ldr on
Kugan wrote:
> Ping^2?
Could you make sure to either include the patch or provide a link to it?
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01967.html)
I think the patch is fine since avoiding adrp/ldr on literals doesn't really
help when global variables still use adrp. If you really want to
Ping^2?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 21 July 2017 at 20:12, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
> Ping ?
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> On 27 June 2017 at 11:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> wrote:
>>
Ping ?
Thanks,
Kugan
On 27 June 2017 at 11:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
> workaround to get kernel building with when TARGET_FIX_ERR_A53_843419
> is enabled.
>
> This was added to
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
> Hi Ramana,
>
> On 27 June 2017 at 18:01, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On 27/06/17 02:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi Ramana,
On 27 June 2017 at 18:01, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> On 27/06/17 02:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
>> workaround to get kernel building with when
On 27/06/17 02:20, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
workaround to get kernel building with when TARGET_FIX_ERR_A53_843419
is enabled.
This was added to support building kernel loadable modules. In kernel,
when
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00614.html added this
workaround to get kernel building with when TARGET_FIX_ERR_A53_843419
is enabled.
This was added to support building kernel loadable modules. In kernel,
when CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 is selected, the relocation needed
for
13 matches
Mail list logo