Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Certainly no objections to it - in fact I'd suggest it for 4.6 as well.
The backport is fine, if someone wants to do the work. Just let it bake a =
little in the top of the tree as usual first.
I've already checked
On 29 February 2012 13:06, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Certainly no objections to it - in fact I'd suggest it for 4.6 as well.
The backport is fine, if someone wants to do the work. Just let it bake a =
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:37:07AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
I just noticed that check_effective_target_vect_condition returns false
for ARM/NEON, even though the platforms in fact supports vectorized
conditional expressions. This causes a
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Certainly no objections to it - in fact I'd suggest it for 4.6 as well.
The backport is fine, if someone wants to do the work. Just let it bake a
little in the top of the tree as usual first.
