The command line option to enable Armv8.1-M Mainline Security Extensions
has a typo and this patch corrects it.

Committed it under the obvious rule.
###############     Attachment also inlined for ease of reply    ###############


diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
index 
5bcffdd7e7b6014cbf577b7e738c199a6a63ec0b..2bc25d923b334678f418f443ec6ba9c763fd0e97
 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ typedef svbool_t pred512 
__attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(512)));
   <a 
href="https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/0010/custom-datapath-extension";>
   intrinsics</a> has been added.</li>
   <li>Support for Armv8.1-M Mainline Security Extensions architecture has been 
added. The <code>-mcmse</code> option,
-  when used in combination with an Armv8.1-M Mainline architecture (for 
example: <code>-march=armv8.1.m.main -mcmse</code>),
+  when used in combination with an Armv8.1-M Mainline architecture (for 
example: <code>-march=armv8.1-m.main -mcmse</code>),
   now leads to the generation of improved code sequences when changing 
security states.</li>
 </ul>
 

diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
index 
5bcffdd7e7b6014cbf577b7e738c199a6a63ec0b..2bc25d923b334678f418f443ec6ba9c763fd0e97
 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ typedef svbool_t pred512 
__attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(512)));
   <a 
href="https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/0010/custom-datapath-extension";>
   intrinsics</a> has been added.</li>
   <li>Support for Armv8.1-M Mainline Security Extensions architecture has been 
added. The <code>-mcmse</code> option,
-  when used in combination with an Armv8.1-M Mainline architecture (for 
example: <code>-march=armv8.1.m.main -mcmse</code>),
+  when used in combination with an Armv8.1-M Mainline architecture (for 
example: <code>-march=armv8.1-m.main -mcmse</code>),
   now leads to the generation of improved code sequences when changing 
security states.</li>
 </ul>
 

Reply via email to