Re: [C++ Patch] Remove is_auto_or_concept, etc

Sorry for not getting back to your original post Paolo. I haven't been picking up mails for a while. On 2017-05-01 16:56, Jason Merrill wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 26/04/2017 12:32, Paolo Carlini wrote: in 2013 (2013-09-16)

Re: [C++ Patch] Remove is_auto_or_concept, etc (Was: Re: [C++, concepts] Two slightly obscure pt.c functions?)

OK. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi again, > > On 26/04/2017 12:32, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> in 2013 (2013-09-16) Adam added two slightly obscure functions and I can't >> find much around in terms of rationale, etc: >> >> /*

Re: [C++ Patch] Remove is_auto_or_concept, etc (Was: Re: [C++, concepts] Two slightly obscure pt.c functions?)

On 04/27/2017 02:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: ... replying to myself, in practice we could do the below, which certainly passes testing, and in fact now seems to me even more obvious than I thought a couple of days ago... I'm insufficiently conceptified to know whether this is safe (but lack

[C++ Patch] Remove is_auto_or_concept, etc (Was: Re: [C++, concepts] Two slightly obscure pt.c functions?)

Hi again, On 26/04/2017 12:32, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, in 2013 (2013-09-16) Adam added two slightly obscure functions and I can't find much around in terms of rationale, etc: /* Returns true iff TYPE is a TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM representing 'auto', 'decltype(auto)' or a concept. */ bool