On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:18:31PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, what approach do you prefer? I've so far bootstrapped/regtested the
> second patch, which showed those
> +FAIL: g++.dg/cilk-plus/AN/builtin_fn_custom_tplt.cc
> +UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cilk-plus/AN/builtin_fn_custom_tplt.cc
> +FAIL:
Hi!
The following testcase results in ICE in C++, while is properly rejected in
C. The problem is that the C++ FE treats some varargs builtins as magic and
doesn't perform any conversion on their args.
The first patch is just minimal, just ensures that we reject the builtins
without library
