On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:50:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I've bootstrapped/regtested the following patch last night and committed
> > after preapproval from Nathan, though of course a question is if
> >
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've bootstrapped/regtested the following patch last night and committed
> after preapproval from Nathan, though of course a question is if
> lookup_fnfields_slot/lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy shouldn't have
> if
Hi!
The r250440 change removed two spots that ensured that for
!CLASS_TYPE_P (type) it returned -1 (from the idx routines that
are gone now) and eventually NULL from the non-idx ones.
I've bootstrapped/regtested a change with various assertions that
showed that except for this testcase and spot