On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:06:38PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/25/2014 07:43 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
* semantics.c (finish_static_assert): Strip no-op conversions.
I think I'd rather strip these in cxx_eval_builtin_function_call so that we
don't have to deal with them in various
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 05:59:17PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
PR62024 reports that we can't use __atomic_always_lock_free in
a static assert, as the FEs say it's not a constant expression. Yet the
docs say that the result of
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
PR62024 reports that we can't use __atomic_always_lock_free in
a static assert, as the FEs say it's not a constant expression. Yet the
docs say that the result of __atomic_always_lock_free is a compile time
constant.
We can fix this pretty easily.
On 08/25/2014 07:43 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
* semantics.c (finish_static_assert): Strip no-op conversions.
I think I'd rather strip these in cxx_eval_builtin_function_call so that
we don't have to deal with them in various consumers.
Jason
PR62024 reports that we can't use __atomic_always_lock_free in
a static assert, as the FEs say it's not a constant expression. Yet the
docs say that the result of __atomic_always_lock_free is a compile time
constant.
We can fix this pretty easily. While fold folds __atomic_always_lock_free
to a
