On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:31:38AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
OK, though I'm not sure if the lp64 conditions are right in the testcase
It should be !ia32 instead of lp64.
Ok, I changed lp64 to ! { ia32 } and committed the
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:29 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:31:38AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
OK, though I'm not sure if the lp64 conditions are right in the testcase
It should be !ia32
On 06/02/14 00:52, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we
Ping.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U declspecs-align_log;
if (alignas_align TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type))
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:31:38AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
OK, though I'm not sure if the lp64 conditions are right in the testcase
It should be !ia32 instead of lp64.
Ok, I changed lp64 to ! { ia32 } and committed the patch now.
Marek
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U declspecs-align_log;
if (alignas_align TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type))
{
if
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U declspecs-align_log;
if (alignas_align
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:33AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:14:42AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hmm, but isn't TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT wrong then?
No, after all, you don't want to change __alignof__ (long long), that is
pretty essential part of ABI.
Yeah, as I understand things, for x86_64 __alignof__ (T) returns
*preferred*
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U declspecs-align_log;
if (alignas_align TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type))
{
if (name)
error_at (loc, %_Alignas%
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
In this PR the issue is that we reject (valid) code such as
_Alignas (long long) long long foo;
with -m32, because we trip this condition:
alignas_align = 1U declspecs-align_log;
if (alignas_align TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type))
13 matches
Mail list logo
