On 24-11-14 13:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 24-11-14 12:28, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 17-11-14 11:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm submitting a patch series with initial
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 24-11-14 12:28, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 17-11-14 11:13, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > >
> > > > >On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I'm submitting a patch se
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 17-11-14 11:13, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > >On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I'm submitting a patch series with initial support for the oacc
> > > > kernels
On 24-11-14 12:28, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 17-11-14 11:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
>On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm submitting a patch series with initial support for the oacc kernels
> >directive.
> >
> >The patch series uses pas
On 17-11-14 11:13, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
>On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm submitting a patch series with initial support for the oacc kernels
> >directive.
> >
> >The patch series uses pass_parallelize_loops to implement paralle
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > > Now - I can see how that is easily confused by the static chain
> > > being address-taken. But I also remember that Eric did some
> > > preparatory work to fix that, for nested functions, that is,
> >
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Now - I can see how that is easily confused by the static chain
> > being address-taken. But I also remember that Eric did some
> > preparatory work to fix that, for nested functions, that is,
> > possibly setting DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P? Don't remembe
> Now - I can see how that is easily confused by the static chain
> being address-taken. But I also remember that Eric did some
> preparatory work to fix that, for nested functions, that is,
> possibly setting DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P? Don't remember exactly.
The preparatory work is DECL_NONLOCAL_F
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm submitting a patch series with initial support for the oacc kernels
> > directive.
> >
> > The patch series uses pass_parallelize_loops to implement parallelization of
> > loops in the oacc kern
On 15-11-14 13:14, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm submitting a patch series with initial support for the oacc kernels
directive.
The patch series uses pass_parallelize_loops to implement parallelization of
loops in the oacc kernels region.
The patch series consists of these 8 patches:
...
1
10 matches
Mail list logo