Re: [PATCH, GCC, stage4] Fix type for .init_array.* and .fini_array.* sections

Hi Kyrill, On 19/04/17 10:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Thomas, On 11/04/17 18:35, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi, Several tests started failing for ARM targets (eg. gcc.dg/initpri1.c) after change 6f9dbcd42f2cf034a9a21f46842c08d2e88449db in binutils. This is because the non-default priority init

Re: [PATCH, GCC, stage4] Fix type for .init_array.* and .fini_array.* sections

Hi Thomas, On 11/04/17 18:35, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi, Several tests started failing for ARM targets (eg. gcc.dg/initpri1.c) after change 6f9dbcd42f2cf034a9a21f46842c08d2e88449db in binutils. This is because the non-default priority init_array and fini_array sections are not created with NO

Re: [PATCH, GCC, stage4] Fix type for .init_array.* and .fini_array.* sections

Stage 4 ping? Best regards, Thomas On 11/04/17 18:35, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi, Several tests started failing for ARM targets (eg. gcc.dg/initpri1.c) after change 6f9dbcd42f2cf034a9a21f46842c08d2e88449db in binutils. This is because the non-default priority init_array and fini_array sectio

[PATCH, GCC, stage4] Fix type for .init_array.* and .fini_array.* sections

Hi, Several tests started failing for ARM targets (eg. gcc.dg/initpri1.c) after change 6f9dbcd42f2cf034a9a21f46842c08d2e88449db in binutils. This is because the non-default priority init_array and fini_array sections are not created with NOTYPE flag as is the case for default priority init_array