Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-17 Thread Mike Stump
On May 17, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > I thought I remembered mail going by that changes to a release branch require > RM approval too. For time to time, the RM can close any release branch at any time for any reason. :-) For example, a gcc 3.2.x

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-17 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 05/17/2016 03:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 05/16/2016 04:35 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: This is my fifth ping. I just need someone to rubber stamp it so I can check it in. The documentation change

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-17 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 05/16/2016 04:35 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: >> >> This is my fifth ping. I just need someone to rubber stamp it so I >> can check it in. > > > The documentation change looks fine, but as a documentation maintainer

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-17 Thread Mike Stump
On May 16, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > On 05/16/2016 04:35 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: >> This is my fifth ping. I just need someone to rubber stamp it so I >> can check it in. > > The documentation change looks fine, but as a documentation maintainer only

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-17 Thread Mike Stump
Or, you can cc Jason directly, and ping it. His mailbox filtering has him reading a subset of the patches emails, (those with C++ as I recall), so this is likely the first time he has seen it. > On May 16, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: > > This is my fifth ping.

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-16 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 05/16/2016 04:35 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: This is my fifth ping. I just need someone to rubber stamp it so I can check it in. The documentation change looks fine, but as a documentation maintainer only I don't think I can approve changes to a release branch. -Sandra

Re: PING^5 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-16 Thread Jim Wilson
This is my fifth ping. I just need someone to rubber stamp it so I can check it in. Maybe it would be easier if I volunteered to be a doc maintainer so I can self approve it? Jim On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Jim

PING^4 [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-09 Thread Jim Wilson
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: > Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html Maybe I didn't put enough info in the email the first 3 times? You can see the default

Re: [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-05-02 Thread Jim Wilson
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html ping^3 I put an explanation of the patch history for gcc-5 in the PR

Re: [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-04-25 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 04/25/2016 08:44 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: On 04/18/2016 01:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: On 04/11/2016 01:41 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html ping^2 Cc'ing Jason as the most

Re: [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-04-25 Thread Jim Wilson
On 04/18/2016 01:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: On 04/11/2016 01:41 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html ping^2 Jim

Re: [PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-04-18 Thread Jim Wilson
On 04/11/2016 01:41 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html Jim

[PATCH, GCC 5] PR 70613, -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

2016-04-11 Thread Jim Wilson
Here is a patch to correct the -fabi-version docs on the GCC 5 branch. This was tested with an x86_64-linux bootstrap, make doc, make dvi, and checking the output info and dvi files to make sure the changes look right. Ok to check in? Jim Index: ChangeLog