Hi! I'd like to ping this patch.
Thanks!
Bill
On 11/18/21 10:18 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new
> builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error
> message wording.
>
> Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64)
> with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk?
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
>
>
> 2021-11-17 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c: Adjust error message.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
> index e03099bd084..c1667d9f7db 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ vector bool int
> test2 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
> {
> return vec_cmpnez (a, b);
> - /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9'
> option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
> + /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9'
> and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
> }
>
> #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power7")
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ vector signed int
> test3 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
> {
> return vec_mergee (a, b);
> - /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the
> '-mpower8-vector' option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
> + /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the '-mcpu=power8'
> and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
> }
>
> #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power6")
