2015-02-15 20:25 GMT+03:00 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* gcc.dg/pr65002.C: New.
This test should have gone into g++.dg.
Into
On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* gcc.dg/pr65002.C: New.
This test should have gone into g++.dg.
Into g++.dg/opt or g++.dg/ipa in particular.
Pre-approved if
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
PR65002 is the second issue caused by SRA for functions wrongly marked as
read-only. Previous fix for PR64353 doesn't work for this case because SSA
update happens too late. Here is a patch to disable SRA for
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* tree-cfg.c (pass_data_fixup_cfg): Don't update
SSA on start.
* tree-sra.c (some_callers_have_no_vuse_p): New.
2015-02-13 11:54 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* tree-cfg.c (pass_data_fixup_cfg): Don't update
SSA on start.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
2015-02-12 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR tree-optimization/65002
* tree-cfg.c (pass_data_fixup_cfg): Don't update
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:21:42AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
I wonder if this won't pessimize const functions that just get called with
aggregate arguments passed by value, do those count as memory read or
just as parameters?
They count as memory reads and thus cause a VUSE (similar to
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:14:19PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
PR65002 is the second issue caused by SRA for functions wrongly marked as
read-only. Previous fix for PR64353 doesn't work for this case because SSA
update happens too late. Here is a patch to disable SRA for such
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:19:52PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:14:19PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
PR65002 is the second issue caused by SRA for functions wrongly marked as
read-only. Previous fix for PR64353 doesn't work for this case because SSA
Hi,
PR65002 is the second issue caused by SRA for functions wrongly marked as
read-only. Previous fix for PR64353 doesn't work for this case because SSA
update happens too late. Here is a patch to disable SRA for such functions to
avoid inconsistent SSA issues.
Bootstrapped and tested on
10 matches
Mail list logo
