Re: [PATCH, RFC] Re-work find_reloads_subreg_address (Re: [PATCH][RFC, Reload]. Reload bug?)

2012-08-20 Thread Tejas Belagod
Tejas Belagod wrote: Ulrich Weigand wrote: The following patch implements this idea; it passes a basic regression test on arm-linux-gnueabi. (Obviously this would need a lot more testing on various platforms before getting into mainline ...) Can you have a look whether this fixes the problem

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Re-work find_reloads_subreg_address (Re: [PATCH][RFC, Reload]. Reload bug?)

2012-08-02 Thread Tejas Belagod
Ulrich Weigand wrote: The following patch implements this idea; it passes a basic regression test on arm-linux-gnueabi. (Obviously this would need a lot more testing on various platforms before getting into mainline ...) Can you have a look whether this fixes the problem you're seeing?

[PATCH, RFC] Re-work find_reloads_subreg_address (Re: [PATCH][RFC, Reload]. Reload bug?)

2012-07-27 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Tejas Belagod wrote: Tejas Belagod wrote: This is because offsettable_address_addr_space_p () gets as far as calling strict_memory_address_addr_space_p () with a QImode and (mode_sz - 1) which returns true. The only way I see offsettable_address_addr_space_p () returning false would be