On 10/24/2017 07:26 PM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:13:52AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> So we can't depend on patches that OpenBSD applies. What's important is
>> what is in the official GCC sources.
>>
>> I'd like to see some discussion about what these macros should look
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:13:52AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> So we can't depend on patches that OpenBSD applies. What's important is
> what is in the official GCC sources.
>
> I'd like to see some discussion about what these macros should look like
> for the *bsd ports. Merely removing them from
On 09/03/2017 09:47 AM, Maya Rashish wrote:
> Hi, in my first attempt to fix a build issue I found that the order of
> tm files matters, would prefer to move linux-looking parts of elf.h to
> linux.h.
>
> other targets that include alpha/elf.h besides linux:
> openbsd: provides their own
Hi, in my first attempt to fix a build issue I found that the order of
tm files matters, would prefer to move linux-looking parts of elf.h to
linux.h.
other targets that include alpha/elf.h besides linux:
openbsd: provides their own STARTFILE_SPEC and ENDFILE_SPEC in later file:
