On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:51 +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> On 25 January 2016 at 18:33, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> I'll leave it to you or someone else to fix the -m32 bug, since
>> I'm not seeing it on my system.
>
> Neither am I :-(
I have a powerpc64-linux (ie, BE)
When the test case derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 was backported to
the FSF 5 branch, a '}' on the dg-additional-options was dropped
causing the test case to fail. I have added it back and committed
it as obvious.
Peter
PR fortran/61831
*
Dear Peter,
Many thanks! I have been away, got back last night and had intended to
deal with it tonight. You should note that Dominique has flagged up
that it fails with -m32.
Tshuess
Paul
On 25 January 2016 at 18:09, Peter Bergner wrote:
> When the test case
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:17 +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Many thanks! I have been away, got back last night and had intended
> to deal with it tonight.
No problem.
> You should note that Dominique has flagged up that it fails with
> -m32.
I was building on powerpc64le-linux (which
Neither am I :-(
Paul
On 25 January 2016 at 18:33, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:17 +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> Many thanks! I have been away, got back last night and had intended
>> to deal with it tonight.
>
> No problem.
>
>
>> You should note