Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix insertion of nop[s] to force dependent load into new dispatch group.

2012-07-05 Thread Pat Haugen
On 05/23/2012 10:48 AM, Pat Haugen wrote: The following patch fixes existing code that tried to prevent load-hit-store (LHS) from being in the same dispatch group. The main problem was use of the wrong dependency list in is_costly_group(), but I also added code to verify the memory refs

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix insertion of nop[s] to force dependent load into new dispatch group.

2012-07-05 Thread David Edelsohn
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Pat Haugen pthau...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Ok for backport to 4.7 branch now that that is open again? Yes. Thanks, David

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix insertion of nop[s] to force dependent load into new dispatch group.

2012-05-24 Thread David Edelsohn
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Pat Haugen pthau...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: The following patch fixes existing code that tried to prevent load-hit-store (LHS) from being in the same dispatch group. The main problem was use of the wrong dependency list in is_costly_group(), but I also added

[PATCH, rs6000] Fix insertion of nop[s] to force dependent load into new dispatch group.

2012-05-23 Thread Pat Haugen
The following patch fixes existing code that tried to prevent load-hit-store (LHS) from being in the same dispatch group. The main problem was use of the wrong dependency list in is_costly_group(), but I also added code to verify the memory refs overlap and to emit group ending nops for those