On 24 November 2014 at 17:49, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I had some local patches in my tree which adds a bswap tree code.
> This breaks the aarch64 back-end vectorizing of byteswaps as we use
> the standard mechanism to see if a tree code vectorizes (optabs).
> Since it make sense to have consistent
I had some local patches in my tree which adds a bswap tree code.
This breaks the aarch64 back-end vectorizing of byteswaps as we use
the standard mechanism to see if a tree code vectorizes (optabs).
Since it make sense to have consistent of the pattern names between
the vector version and the scal
