Hi Mike,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 07:26:44PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test to make sure
> -fstack-protect-strong works with prefixed addressing.
The option is -fstack-protector-strong. But what is tested is equally
true for any
This patch checks whether the -fstack-protect-strong option works with a large
stack frame on -mcpu=future systems where prefixed instructions are generated.
Can I check this into the FSF trunk?
2019-11-14 Michael Meissner
* gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-stack-protect.c: New test to make