On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 07:50:48PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> > I've been putting off reviewing this patch for a while now, because I don't
> > understand enough about the current eh_return code to understand why what
> > you're proposing is correct.
> >
> > The
James Greenhalgh wrote:
> I've been putting off reviewing this patch for a while now, because I don't
> understand enough about the current eh_return code to understand why what
> you're proposing is correct.
>
> The best way to progress this patch would be to go in to more detail as to
> what
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:31:04AM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> > Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds
> > like a serious enough problem that needs to be looked at probably going
> > back since the dawn of time.
>
> I've created
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a s
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds l
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 November 2016 16:49
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds l
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a s
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a s
ping
From: Wilco Dijkstra
Sent: 02 September 2016 12:31
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan; GCC Patches
Cc: nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64 - v3] Simplify eh_return implementation
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a s
ping
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a serious enough problem that needs to be looked at probably going back since
> the dawn of time.
I've created PR77455. Updated patch below:
This patch simplifies the
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Can you please file a PR for this and add some testcases ? This sounds like
> a serious enough problem that needs to be looked at probably going back since
> the dawn of time.
I've created PR77455. Updated patch below:
This patch simplifies the handling of the EH
12 matches
Mail list logo
