On Sat, 18 Aug 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:41:37AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I am however concerned with:
static void
store_bindings (tree names, VEC(cxx_saved_binding,gc) **old_bindings)
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:41:37AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I am however concerned with:
static void
store_bindings (tree names, VEC(cxx_saved_binding,gc) **old_bindings)
{
! static VEC(tree,heap) *bindings_need_stored = NULL;
I
This reduces the number of re-allocations and the amount of memory
wasted by store_binding. Previously, on a cut-down testcase from
PR54146 we can see (--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats -fmem-report
output):
cp/name-lookup.c:5874 (store_binding) 12033504: 1.6%
8564032: 2.4%
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This reduces the number of re-allocations and the amount of memory
wasted by store_binding. Previously, on a cut-down testcase from
PR54146 we can see (--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats -fmem-report
output):
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
which means only 19516 reallocations and 350kb wasted memory. The
compile-time effects are neutral (name-lookup is 1.0+-0.05s on
the reduced testcase) - a slightly different version which omitted
the temporary vector
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This reduces the number of re-allocations and the amount of memory
wasted by store_binding. Previously, on a cut-down testcase from
PR54146 we can see
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:41:37AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I am however concerned with:
static void
store_bindings (tree names, VEC(cxx_saved_binding,gc) **old_bindings)
{
! static VEC(tree,heap) *bindings_need_stored = NULL;
I would be more comfortable to see the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 06:41:37AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I am however concerned with:
static void
store_bindings (tree names, VEC(cxx_saved_binding,gc) **old_bindings)
{
! static VEC(tree,heap)
