On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This fixes PR52549 - we are running into an overzealous assert
> that wants to make sure we don't have PLUS_EXPR on pointers.
> But that code does not really check this and falls foul of
> the conversion removal code right before it that transforms
This fixes PR52549 - we are running into an overzealous assert
that wants to make sure we don't have PLUS_EXPR on pointers.
But that code does not really check this and falls foul of
the conversion removal code right before it that transforms
(void *)(a + b) to a + b.
Fixed as follows.
Bootstrap
