Re: [PATCH][Testsuite] Add --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed to sra-12.c

On 18/03/16 10:34, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > On 21/10/15 16:59, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 10/21/2015 09:52 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote: >>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-12.c is skipped on a bunch of targets, including >>> AArch64, >>> because the default max-scalarization-size depends on MOVE_RATIO, and >>> on

Re: Re: [PATCH][Testsuite] Add --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed to sra-12.c

On 21/10/15 16:59, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/21/2015 09:52 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote: >> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-12.c is skipped on a bunch of targets, including >> AArch64, >> because the default max-scalarization-size depends on MOVE_RATIO, and >> on those >> targets thus ends up being too small for SRA

[PATCH][Testsuite] Add --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed to sra-12.c

gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-12.c is skipped on a bunch of targets, including AArch64, because the default max-scalarization-size depends on MOVE_RATIO, and on those targets thus ends up being too small for SRA to optimize the testcase. Recently I noticed that the test has been failing for some time on ARM

Re: [PATCH][Testsuite] Add --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed to sra-12.c

On 10/21/2015 09:52 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-12.c is skipped on a bunch of targets, including AArch64, because the default max-scalarization-size depends on MOVE_RATIO, and on those targets thus ends up being too small for SRA to optimize the testcase. Recently I noticed that