Now backport to gcc-11/12/13 branches.
On 29/09/2023 11:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 18:25, François Dumont wrote:
On 28/09/2023 18:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 05:44, François Dumont wrote:
Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 18:25, François Dumont wrote:
>
>
> On 28/09/2023 18:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 05:44, François Dumont wrote:
> >> Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can commit the below
> >> then ?
> > I've heard back from Tim now. Please use
On 28/09/2023 18:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 05:44, François Dumont wrote:
Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can commit the below
then ?
I've heard back from Tim now. Please use "Tim Song
" as the author.
You can change the commit again using git
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 05:44, François Dumont wrote:
>
> Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can commit the below
> then ?
I've heard back from Tim now. Please use "Tim Song
" as the author.
You can change the commit again using git commit --amend --author "Tim
Song "
OK for
Still no chance to get feedback from TC ? Maybe I can commit the below
then ?
AFAICS on gcc mailing list several gcc releases were done recently, too
late.
On 14/09/2023 06:46, François Dumont wrote:
Author: TC
Date: Wed Sep 6 19:31:55 2023 +0200
libstdc++: Force
Author: TC
Date: Wed Sep 6 19:31:55 2023 +0200
libstdc++: Force _Hash_node_value_base methods inline to fix abi
(PR111050)
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=1b6f0476837205932613ddb2b3429a55c26c409d
changed _Hash_node_value_base to no longer derive from
_Hash_node_base,
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 18:19, François Dumont wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/2023 13:51, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 14:57, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> >> Following confirmation of the fix by TC here is the patch where I'm
> >> simply adding a 'constexpr' on
On 11/09/2023 13:51, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 14:57, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
Following confirmation of the fix by TC here is the patch where I'm
simply adding a 'constexpr' on _M_next().
Please let me know this ChangeLog entry is correct. I would prefer
On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 14:57, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Following confirmation of the fix by TC here is the patch where I'm
> simply adding a 'constexpr' on _M_next().
>
> Please let me know this ChangeLog entry is correct. I would prefer this
> patch to be assigned to 'TC' with
François Dumont via Gcc-patches writes:
> Following confirmation of the fix by TC here is the patch where I'm
> simply adding a 'constexpr' on _M_next().
>
> Please let me know this ChangeLog entry is correct. I would prefer
> this patch to be assigned to 'TC' with me as co-author but I don't
Following confirmation of the fix by TC here is the patch where I'm
simply adding a 'constexpr' on _M_next().
Please let me know this ChangeLog entry is correct. I would prefer this
patch to be assigned to 'TC' with me as co-author but I don't know how
to do such a thing. Unless I need to
11 matches
Mail list logo
